Buccal Midazolam Versus Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Plus Oral Chloral Hydrate in Inguinal Hernia Repair

April 24, 2024 updated by: Ramy Mousa, Benha University

Comparison Between Buccal Midazolam Versus Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Plus Oral Chloral Hydrate in Reducing Parental Separation Anxiety in Children Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures in early infancy. Preoperative anxiety remains a vexing issue, and it exists in nearly 50% of pediatric patients

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures in early infancy. Preoperative anxiety remains a vexing issue, and it exists in nearly 50% of pediatric patients.

The administration of sedatives to a child before entering a surgical room is the most common way of reducing the child's distress and allows the child to undergo smooth anesthesia induction.

Chloral hydrate is a widely used sedative for young children undergoing imaging studies, with a high success rate.

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 agonist for paediatric sedation. It produces sedation like natural non-rapid eye movement sleep and has respiratory-sparing effect.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Banha, Egypt, 13511
        • Benha University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 2 to 7
  • American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) І and П scheduled for inguinal hernia repair

Exclusion Criteria:

  • sensitivity to dexmedetomidine or midazolam,
  • infection of the upper respiratory tract,
  • severe liver or kidney disease, organ dysfunction,
  • cardiac arrhythmia or congenital heart disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: buccal midazolam group
Children received oral placebo syrup, intranasal 0.9 % normal saline at 0.03 ml/kg and buccal midazolam at 0.1 mg/ kg mixed with simple syrup
Children received oral chloral hydrate (Chloral Hydrate mixture, concentration at 0.5gm/5ml, 250 ml bottle, prepared at abo Elreesh pharmacy, Elmoneerah , Egypt) at 50 mg /kg, intranasal dexmedetomidine at 2 μg/kg and buccal normal saline. Dexmedetomidine used was preservative-free dexmedetomidine (Precedex, 2ml ampoule,100 ug /ml, Hospira, Inc, Rocky Mount, USA) in a concentration of 100 μg/mL. Undiluted drug was withdrawn into a 1 mL tuberculin syringe.
Other Names:
  • Group A
Experimental: oral chloral hydrate and intranasal dexmedetomidine group
Children received oral chloral hydrate (Chloral Hydrate mixture, concentration at 0.5gm/5ml, 250 ml bottle, at 50 mg /kg, intranasal dexmedetomidine at 2 μg/kg and buccal normal saline.
Children received oral chloral hydrate (Chloral Hydrate mixture, concentration at 0.5gm/5ml, 250 ml bottle, prepared at abo Elreesh pharmacy, Elmoneerah , Egypt) at 50 mg /kg, intranasal dexmedetomidine at 2 μg/kg and buccal normal saline. Dexmedetomidine used was preservative-free dexmedetomidine (Precedex, 2ml ampoule,100 ug /ml, Hospira, Inc, Rocky Mount, USA) in a concentration of 100 μg/mL. Undiluted drug was withdrawn into a 1 mL tuberculin syringe.
Other Names:
  • Group B

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ramsay sedation score
Time Frame: RSSs were recorded just immediately before and at 10 , 20 , 30 min after dosing
The scoring criteria were as follows: (1) patient shows anxiety and restlessness; (2) patient is cooperative, oriented, and quiet; (3) patient is responsive to instructions; (4) patient shows somnolence and responsive to the tapping of the glabella or to loud auditory stimuli; (5) patient shows somnolence and unresponsive to the tapping of the glabella or to loud auditory stimuli; and (6) patient shows somnolence without any response.
RSSs were recorded just immediately before and at 10 , 20 , 30 min after dosing

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parental separation anxiety scale
Time Frame: Preoperatively
Anxiety score was determined when the child was separated from the parents according to four levels: (1) easy to separate; (2) sobbing but easy to cease; (3) crying loudly and difficult to stop but without holding the parents and not letting them go; and (4) crying loudly and holding the parents and not willing to let them go. PSAS scores of 1 and 2 were considered "successful separation from parents
Preoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ramy Saleh, MD, Anesthesia and surgical ICU department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 26, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon reasonable request from the principle investigator

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia Repair

Clinical Trials on buccal midazolam +oral placebo syrup

3
Subscribe