Do the Health Education Materials Developed in the Gynecology and Diseases Nursing Course Affect Students' Teaching Material Motivation and Material Design Self-Efficacy Beliefs?

April 25, 2024 updated by: Simge Ozturk, Inonu University

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effect of health education material developed by nursing students in gynecological health and disease nursing on students' teaching material motivation and material design self-efficacy belief.

Method: The study was conducted as a prospective randomized controlled study. n=86 (43=control, 43=intervention) students who took the Women's Health and Diseases Nursing course at Bartın University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Department between 30.10.2023-20.01.2024 and volunteered to participate in the study were randomized. It was conducted in two groups: intervention and control.In the research, data will be collected with the Data Collection Form prepared by reviewing the literature, Instructional Material Motivation Scale and Material Design Self-Efficacy Belief Scale. Descriptive statistics, Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U Test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Pearson correlation tests will be used to evaluate the data.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aim: This study aimed to examine the effect of health education material developed by nursing students in women's health and disease nursing on students' teaching material motivation and material design self-efficacy beliefs.

Method: The study was conducted as a prospective randomized controlled study. n=86 (43=control, 43=intervention) students who took the Women's Health and Diseases Nursing course at Bartın University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Department between 30.10.2023-20.01.2024 and volunteered to participate in the study were randomized. It was conducted in two groups: intervention and control. In the research, data will be collected with the Data Collection Form prepared by reviewing the literature, Instructional Material Motivation Scale and Material Design Self-Efficacy Belief Scale. Descriptive statistics, Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U Test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Pearson correlation tests will be used to evaluate the data.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • None Selected
      • Bartin, None Selected, Turkey, 74100
        • Simge OZTURK

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students who were over 18 years old,
  • Students who spoke Turkish,
  • Students who were not diagnosed with hearing impairment,
  • Students who took the Gynecology and Diseases Nursing course,
  • Students who had written consent
  • Students who volunteered to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not studying at Bartın University,
  • students who did not take the Gynecology and Diseases Nursing course

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Skill Group
Students in the skill group will take one of the applications in the Skill Checklists (Breastfeeding Education Skill Check Form, Breast Care and Caregiving to Mothers with Breast Engorgement Skill Check Form, Breast Self-Examination (KKMM) Training Skill Check Form) within the scope of the "Women's Health and Diseases Nursing Course". Health education material was prepared in line with the skills they determined. The duration of training material preparation is determined as 1 week for each student. The health education material developed was prepared and presented by evaluating the reason, importance, awareness aspect and innovative perspective of the determined skill.
In line with the skill they will determine for one of the applications in the Skill Checklists (Breastfeeding Education Skill Control Form, Breast Care and Giving Care to Mothers with Breast Engorgement Skill Control Form, Breast Self-Examination (KKMM) Training Skill Control Form) apply.
No Intervention: Control Group
The post-test will be applied to the control group 1 day after the pre-test, and the questionnaires and scales applied in the pre-test to the skill group were re-evaluated after the presentation of the health education material.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Instructional Material Motivation Scale
Time Frame: two weeks

The original version of the scale was published by Keller (2010). PMSQ, a 36-item measurement tool consisting of five-point Likert type options (not true, somewhat true, true, moderately true, very true), was developed by taking the ARCS Model as a criterion. The measurement tool consists of four sub-dimensions with the same name as the compliance, trust, satisfaction and attention components of the ARCS Model. The 3rd, 7th, 12th, 15th, 19th, 22nd, 29th, 31st and 34th items of the measurement tool have negative expressions and require reverse scoring. The lowest score that can be obtained from the measurement tool, whose midpoint is 108.00, is 36.00, while the highest score is 180.00 (Keller, 2010).

Increasing scores from the scale indicate an increase in motivation. The original version of the scale was applied to university students by Keller (2006), and as a result of the analyzes made for the sub-dimensions of the measurement tool.

two weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Material Design Self-Efficacy Belief Scale
Time Frame: two weeks

In order to determine material design self-efficacy beliefs, the Material Design Self-Efficacy Belief Scale developed by Bakaç and Özen (2015) was used. The validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted on 300 teacher candidates who studied at Abant İzzet Baysal University in the 2013-2014 academic year and had previously taken the ÖTMT course. The construct validity of the scale was tested by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and a scale with three dimensions (Material Preparation on Computer, Three-Dimensional Material Design and Two-Dimensional Material Design) and 25 items was created, explaining 48% of the total variance. The scale items are 5-point Likert type and are as follows: "Strongly Disagree", "Disagree", Undecided", Agree" and "Strongly Agree".

Increasing scores from the scale indicate an increase in motivation.

two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nursing Caries

Clinical Trials on Education

3
Subscribe