- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT04017663
Publicly Versus Privately-Funded Cardiac Rehabilitation
Publicly Versus Privately-Funded Cardiac Rehabilitation: Access and Adherence Barriers
This is an observational cross-sectional study designed to investigate the barriers encountered by patients after admission to a public and private PRC and to correlate the barriers with the population profile.
To participate in this study, patients were recruited for convenience of two CRPs offered in the city of Presidente Prudente - SP, one linked to the private service offered by the Heart Institute (INCOR) and another public in the Cardiology Sector of the Center for Studies and Attendance in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation - CEAFiR of the Faculty of Sciences and Technology, State University of São Paulo, Júlio de Mesquita Filho (FCT-UNESP).
As eligibility criteria, patients over 18 years of age, regardless of sex, diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases or referred for risk factor prevention and who had attended CRP for at least 3 months, regardless of the frequency percentage, were considered. Patients who were not found after three visits to the programs for evaluation were excluded from the study.
After the initial invitation and evaluation of the eligibility criteria, the participants were informed about the procedures and objectives of the study, and after agreeing, they signed the informed consent form. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of FCT-UNESP under CAAE number: 88504718.0.0000.5402.
For this, in only one meeting, an initial evaluation was made in order to identify and characterize the patients. Four questionnaires were then applied: the Brazilian Association of Research Companies (ABEP) Questionnaire for the evaluation of socioeconomic level, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Barrier Scale for Cardiac Rehabilitation (EBRC).
Barriers were considered as the primary end point and correlations with the population profile as secondary outcomes.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
This is an observational cross-sectional study designed to investigate the barriers encountered by patients after admission to a public and private PRC and to correlate the barriers with the population profile.
To participate in this study, patients were recruited for convenience of two CRPs offered in the city of Presidente Prudente - SP, one linked to the private service offered by the Heart Institute (INCOR) and another public in the Cardiology Sector of the Center for Studies and Attendance in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation - CEAFiR of the Faculty of Sciences and Technology, State University of São Paulo, Júlio de Mesquita Filho (FCT-UNESP).
As eligibility criteria, patients over 18 years of age, regardless of sex, diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases or referred for risk factor prevention and who had attended CRP for at least 3 months, regardless of the frequency percentage, were considered. Patients who were not found after three visits to the programs for evaluation were excluded from the study.
After the initial invitation and evaluation of the eligibility criteria, the participants were informed about the procedures and objectives of the study, and after agreeing, they signed the informed consent form. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of FCT-UNESP under CAAE number: 88504718.0.0000.5402.
For this, in only one meeting, an initial evaluation was made in order to identify and characterize the patients. Four questionnaires were then applied: the Brazilian Association of Research Companies (ABEP) Questionnaire for the evaluation of socioeconomic level, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Barrier Scale for Cardiac Rehabilitation (EBRC).
Regarding the initial evaluation, the patients were asked about their age, weight and height to obtain the body mass index (BMI) 23, occupation, schooling, city where they currently reside, clinical diagnosis and time of rehabilitation treatment.
In addition, socioeconomic level, cognitive status and level of anxiety and depression were evaluated, which together with the information obtained in the initial evaluation provided the population profile.
In relation to the questionnaires, the questionnaire of the Brazilian Association of Companies and Research (ABEP) was used to analyze the socioeconomic level, which includes the level of schooling, and includes questions about family income, possession of public items and services offered in its residence. The sum of the points can result in a value between zero and one hundred points and the higher the score obtained in the questionnaire the greater the economic power of the patient. From the obtained score, the questionnaire allows the classification of the individual in classes A (average family income of R $ 20,888), B1 (average family income of R $ 9,254), B2 (average family income of R $ 4,852), C1 average family income of R $ 2,705), C2 (average family income of R $ 1,625), D and E (average family income of R $ 3,130), with A for a score higher than 45 and E, a score lower than 16.
The Mental State Mini Exam (MMSE) was used to assess cognitive status. The test is subdivided into two sections, the first one evaluates the orientation, memory and attention and in the second, the ability to appoint, from obedience to a verbal and written command, free writing of a sentence and copy of a complex drawing ( polygons). The higher the score obtained in the test, the better the patient's cognitive status, also considering the level of education (cutoff points: 20 points for illiterates, 25 points for individuals with 1 to 4 years of study, 26.5 points for individuals with 5 to 8 years of study, 28 points for individuals with 9 to 11 years of study, 29 points for individuals with more than 11 years of study).
To quantify the level of anxiety and depression, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was applied. This scale presents seven affirmations for classifying anxiety and seven for depression, which present four options of responses ranging from zero to three points, which generates two scores, one for anxiety and another for depression. The classification is distributed between unlikely anxiety disorder or depression (0 to 7 points), possible disorder (8 to 11 points) and probable disorder (12 to 21 points).
Barriers were evaluated through the Barrier Scale for Cardiac Rehabilitation (EBRC), which is composed of twenty-one items that are scored using a Likert scale, which varies from one to five. This scale can be analyzed by the mean score of all items or divided into five subscales: comorbidities / functional status (B1: items 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 17 and 21), perceived needs (B2: items 3 (B3: items 4, 7 and 18), travel / work conflicts (B4: items 10 and 12) and access (B5: items 1, 2, 19 and 20) 13. The higher the result of the averages, the greater the number of barriers found.
Barriers were considered as the primary end point and correlations with the population profile as secondary outcomes.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
São Paulo
-
Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brasil, 19060-900
- Unesp
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- As eligibility criteria, patients over 18 years of age, regardless of sex, diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases or referred for risk factor prevention and who had attended CRP for at least 3 months, regardless of the frequency percentage, were considered.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who were not found after three visits to the programs for evaluation were excluded from the study.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Modelos observacionales: Otro
- Perspectivas temporales: Transversal
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / Cohorte |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
---|---|
Public group
patients who performed cardiovascular rehabilitation in a public center
|
Application of questionnaires to identify characteristics and main barriers of patients
|
Private group
patients who performed cardiovascular rehabilitation in a private center
|
Application of questionnaires to identify characteristics and main barriers of patients
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
---|---|---|
Barriers
Periodo de tiempo: In the first 1 day of avaliation
|
Barriers were evaluated through the Barrier Scale for Cardiac Rehabilitation (EBRC), which is composed of twenty-one items that are scored using a Likert scale, which varies from one to five.
This scale can be analyzed by the mean score of all items or divided into five subscales: comorbidities / functional status (B1: items 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 17 and 21), perceived needs (B2: items 3 (B3: items 4, 7 and 18), travel / work conflicts (B4: items 10 and 12) and access (B5: items 1, 2, 19 and 20) 13.
The higher the result of the averages, the greater the number of barriers found.
|
In the first 1 day of avaliation
|
Socieconomic level
Periodo de tiempo: In the first 1 day of avaliation
|
In relation to the questionnaires, the questionnaire of the Brazilian Association of Companies and Research (ABEP) was used to analyze the socioeconomic level, which includes the level of schooling, and includes questions about family income, possession of public items and services offered in its residence.
The sum of the points can result in a value between zero and one hundred points and the higher the score obtained in the questionnaire the greater the economic power of the patient.
From the obtained score, the questionnaire allows the classification of the individual in classes A (average family income of R $ 20,888), B1 (average family income of R $ 9,254), B2 (average family income of R $ 4,852), C1 average family income of R $ 2,705), C2 (average family income of R $ 1,625), D and E (average family income of R $ 3,130), with A for a score higher than 45 and E, a score lower than 16.
|
In the first 1 day of avaliation
|
Cognitive Status
Periodo de tiempo: In the first 1 day of avaliation
|
The Mental State Mini Exam (MMSE) was used to assess cognitive status.
The test is subdivided into two sections, the first one evaluates the orientation, memory and attention and in the second, the ability to appoint, from obedience to a verbal and written command, free writing of a sentence and copy of a complex drawing ( polygons).
The higher the score obtained in the test, the better the patient's cognitive status, also considering the level of education (cutoff points: 20 points for illiterates, 25 points for individuals with 1 to 4 years of study, 26.5 points for individuals with 5 to 8 years of study, 28 points for individuals with 9 to 11 years of study, 29 points for individuals with more than 11 years of study).
|
In the first 1 day of avaliation
|
Anxiety and depression level
Periodo de tiempo: In the first 1 day of avaliation
|
To quantify the level of anxiety and depression, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was applied.
This scale presents seven affirmations for classifying anxiety and seven for depression, which present four options of responses ranging from zero to three points, which generates two scores, one for anxiety and another for depression.
The classification is distributed between unlikely anxiety disorder or depression (0 to 7 points), possible disorder (8 to 11 points) and probable disorder (12 to 21 points).
|
In the first 1 day of avaliation
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Giovanna LB Borges, São Paulo State University (Unesp)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- CAAE: 88504718.0.0000.5402
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .
Ensayos clínicos sobre Enfermedades cardiovasculares
-
Mayo ClinicInscripción por invitaciónRiesgo cardiovascular | Prevención cardiovascularEstados Unidos
-
University of DelawareReclutamientoFactor de riesgo cardiovascular | Salud cardiovascularEstados Unidos
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityTerminadoEnfermedad cardiovascular | Factores de riesgo cardiovascularEstados Unidos
-
Medical College of WisconsinReclutamientoEnfermedades cardiovasculares | Factor de riesgo cardiovascular | Salud cardiovascularEstados Unidos
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaTerminadoEnfermedad cardiovascular | Factor de riesgo cardiovascularEspaña
-
University of FloridaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham; Brown UniversityTerminadoEnfermedad cardiovascular | Influencia psicosocial en la enfermedad cardiovascularEstados Unidos
-
Medical College of WisconsinTerminadoEnfermedades cardiovasculares | Factores de riesgo cardiovascular | Salud cardiovascular | Impacto del cantoEstados Unidos
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonTerminadoPacientes de Alto Riesgo Cardiovascular | Pacientes de bajo riesgo cardiovascularFrancia
-
Shanghai 10th People's HospitalDesconocidoPresión arterial | Factor de riesgo cardiovascular | Mortalidad global | Mortalidad cardiovascular | Eventos cardiovasculares | Daño al órgano dianaPorcelana
-
Methodist Health SystemTerminado
Ensayos clínicos sobre Application of questionnaires
-
Anjali Raja BeharelleMediService AGInscripción por invitaciónHipertensión | Adherencia a la medicaciónSuiza
-
Collabree AGUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandReclutamientoHipertensión | Adherencia a la medicaciónSuiza
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityAún no reclutandoTrastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT)
-
University of StellenboschTerminado
-
University of StellenboschTerminadoVIH/SIDA | Tuberculosis - Tuberculosis | Terapia Antirretroviral, Altamente ActivaSudáfrica
-
University of Colorado, DenverReclutamientoDepresión post-partoEstados Unidos
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityDesconocidoDelirio | Efectos secundarios y reacciones adversas relacionados con los medicamentos | Ancianos frágiles | Deterioro cognitivo relacionado con la edad | Úlcera por presión adquirida en el hospitalEstados Unidos
-
Akdeniz UniversityAún no reclutandoAccidente cerebrovascular isquémico | EntrenamientoPavo
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteDesconocidoPlanificación anticipada de la atenciónCanadá
-
Ottawa Heart Institute Research CorporationActivo, no reclutando