- ICH GCP
- Yhdysvaltain kliinisten tutkimusten rekisteri
- Kliininen tutkimus NCT06095102
JNJ-77242113:n tutkimus potilaiden hoitoon, joilla on plakkipsoriaasi, joka koskee erityisalueita (päänahka, sukuelimet ja/tai kämmenet ja jalkapohjat) (ICONIC-TOTAL)
torstai 27. elokuuta 2026 päivittänyt: Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Vaiheen 3 monikeskus, satunnaistettu, kaksoissokkoutettu, lumekontrolloitu tutkimus JNJ-77242113:n tehokkuuden ja turvallisuuden arvioimiseksi potilaiden hoidossa, joilla on plakkipsoriaasi, johon liittyy erityisalueita
Tutkimuksen tarkoituksena on selvittää, kuinka tehokas JNJ-77242113 on potilailla, joilla on plakkipsoriaasi, joka vaikuttaa erityisalueisiin (päänahka, sukuelimet ja/tai kämmenet ja jalkapohjat).
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Tila
Aktiivinen, ei rekrytointi
Ehdot
Interventio / Hoito
Opintotyyppi
Interventio
Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)
311
Vaihe
- Vaihe 3
Yhteystiedot ja paikat
Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.
Opiskelupaikat
-
-
-
Buenos Aires, Argentiina, C1417EYG
- Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar
-
Buenos Aires, Argentiina, C1061AAS
- CIPREC
-
CABA, Argentiina, C1012AAY
- CONEXA Investigacion Clinica S.A.
-
Caba, Argentiina, C1060ABN
- CEDIC Centro de Investigación Clínica
-
-
-
-
-
Badalona, Espanja, 08916
- Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol
-
Barcelona, Espanja, 08003
- Hosp. Del Mar
-
Esplugues de Llobregat, Espanja, 08950
- Hosp. Sant Joan de Deu
-
Granada, Espanja, 18016
- Hosp. Univ. San Cecilio
-
Madrid, Espanja, 28041
- Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre
-
Manises, Espanja, 46940
- Hosp. de Manises
-
Seville, Espanja, 41009
- Hosp. Virgen Macarena
-
Valencia, Espanja, 46026
- Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe
-
-
-
-
-
Busan, Etelä -Korea, 49241
- Pusan National University Hospital
-
Seongnam-si, Etelä -Korea, 13620
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
-
Seoul, Etelä -Korea, 03080
- Seoul National University Hospital
-
Seoul, Etelä -Korea, 08308
- Korea University Guro Hospital
-
Seoul, Etelä -Korea, 05030
- Konkuk University Medical Center
-
-
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Kanada, T6G 1C3
- Alberta Dermasurgery Centre
-
-
Ontario
-
Markham, Ontario, Kanada, L3P 1X3
- Lynderm Research Inc.
-
Peterborough, Ontario, Kanada, K9J 5K2
- SKiN Centre for Dermatology
-
Richmond Hill, Ontario, Kanada, L4B1L1
- York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Kanada, H2X 2V1
- Innovaderm Research Inc.
-
Québec, Quebec, Kanada, G1V 4X7
- Centre Dermatologique
-
-
Saskatchewan
-
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Kanada, S7K 2C1
- Skinsense Medical Research
-
-
-
-
-
Bialystok, Puola, 15-351
- Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik
-
Bialystok, Puola, 15-375
- Specderm Poznanska sp j
-
Krakow, Puola, 31-411
- Centrum Medyczne PROMED
-
Krakow, Puola, 30 438
- Centrum Medyczne dr Rajzer Sp z o o
-
Krakow, Puola, 30-002
- Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna
-
Lodz, Puola, 90-265
- Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o
-
Osielsko, Puola, 86031
- Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C
-
Poznan, Puola, 61 731
- Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k
-
Poznan, Puola, 60 529
- SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne
-
Warsaw, Puola, 02 953
- Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia
-
Warsaw, Puola, 01 817
- Dorota Bystrzanowska High-Med. Przychodnia Specjalistyczna
-
Wroclaw, Puola, 52 416
- Centrum Medyczne Oporow
-
Wroclaw, Puola, 51 685
- Wro Medica
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Saksa, 10789
- ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH
-
Berlin, Saksa, 13627
- CRS Clinical Research Services Berlin GMBH
-
Bochum, Saksa, 44793
- Niesmann & Othlinghaus GbR
-
Darmstadt, Saksa, 64283
- Rosenpark Research GmbH
-
Dresden, Saksa, 01307
- Medizinische Fakultaet Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universitaet Dresden
-
Frankfurt am Main, Saksa, 60590
- Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt
-
Hamburg, Saksa, 20354
- Dermatologikum Hamburg Gmbh
-
Schwerin, Saksa, 19055
- Klinische Forschung Schwerin GmbH
-
Witten, Saksa, 58453
- Hautarztpraxis 2
-
-
-
-
-
Hsinchu, Taiwan, 30059
- National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin Chu Branch
-
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 83301
- Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 10048
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
Taoyuan, Taiwan, 33382
- Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Konya, Turkki (Türkiye), 42080
- Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty
-
Samsun, Turkki (Türkiye), 55270
- Ondokuz Mayis University
-
Trabzon, Turkki (Türkiye), 61080
- Karadeniz Teknik University Medical Faculty
-
-
-
-
-
Borgyogyaszati Klinika, Unkari, 7632
- Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem
-
Budapest, Unkari, 1036
- Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft
-
Debrecen, Unkari, 4031
- Derma-B Kft
-
Szeged, Unkari, 6720
- SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika
-
Szolnok, Unkari, 5000
- Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft.
-
Veszprém, Unkari, 8200
- Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt.
-
-
-
-
-
Harrow, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta, HA1 3UJ
- London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust
-
Salford, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta, M6 8HD
- Salford Royal Hospital
-
Southampton, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta, SO16 6YD
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Scottsdale, Arizona, Yhdysvallat, 85260
- Center for Dermatology and Plastic Surgery
-
-
Arkansas
-
Fort Smith, Arkansas, Yhdysvallat, 72916
- Johnson Dermatology
-
-
California
-
Encinitas, California, Yhdysvallat, 92024
- California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, Yhdysvallat, 33613
- Forcare Clinical Research Inc
-
-
Georgia
-
Alpharetta, Georgia, Yhdysvallat, 30022
- Hamilton Research LLC
-
-
Illinois
-
Rolling Meadows, Illinois, Yhdysvallat, 60008
- Arlington Dermatology
-
West Dundee, Illinois, Yhdysvallat, 60118
- Dundee Dermatology
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, Yhdysvallat, 46250
- Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC
-
Plainfield, Indiana, Yhdysvallat, 46168
- Indiana Clinical Trial Center
-
-
Louisiana
-
Lake Charles, Louisiana, Yhdysvallat, 70605
- Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Beverly, Massachusetts, Yhdysvallat, 01915
- Allcutis Research 1
-
-
Michigan
-
Fort Gratiot, Michigan, Yhdysvallat, 48059
- Hamzavi Dermatology
-
-
Minnesota
-
New Brighton, Minnesota, Yhdysvallat, 55112
- Minnesota Clinical Study Center
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Joseph, Missouri, Yhdysvallat, 64506
- MediSearch Clinical Trials
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, Yhdysvallat, 68144
- Skin Specialists
-
-
New Jersey
-
East Windsor, New Jersey, Yhdysvallat, 08520
- Schweiger Dermatology Group
-
-
Ohio
-
Boardman, Ohio, Yhdysvallat, 44512
- Optima Research
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, Yhdysvallat, 97210
- Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Yhdysvallat, 19103
- Paddington Testing Co, Inc.
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Yhdysvallat, 15213
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
-
-
Texas
-
Arlington, Texas, Yhdysvallat, 76011
- Arlington Research Center, inc.
-
Houston, Texas, Yhdysvallat, 77004
- Center for Clinical Studies 1
-
Pflugerville, Texas, Yhdysvallat, 78660
- Austin Institute for Clinical Research
-
San Antonio, Texas, Yhdysvallat, 78229
- Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio
-
San Antonio, Texas, Yhdysvallat, 78213
- Progressive Clinical Research
-
Webster, Texas, Yhdysvallat, 77598
- Center for Clinical Studies
-
-
Utah
-
Bountiful, Utah, Yhdysvallat, 84010
- Cope Family Medicine - Ogden Clinic
-
-
Washington
-
Mill Creek, Washington, Yhdysvallat, 98012
- Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC
-
-
Osallistumiskriteerit
Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
- Lapsi
- Aikuinen
- Vanhempi Aikuinen
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Ei
Kuvaus
Sisällyttämiskriteerit:
- Plakkipsoriaasin diagnoosi nivelpsoriaasin (PsA) kanssa tai ilman sitä vähintään 26 viikon ajan ennen ensimmäistä tutkimustoimenpidettä
- Ehdokas läiskäpsoriaasin valohoitoon tai systeemiseen hoitoon
- Tarve täyttää kriteerit: Kehon kokonaispinta-ala (BSA) on suurempi tai yhtä suuri kuin (>=) 1 prosentti (%) seulonnassa ja lähtötilanteessa ja tutkijan kokonaisarvio (IGA) (kokonaisuudessaan) >=2 seulonnassa ja lähtötilanteessa ja klo. vähintään yksi seuraavista: päänahan spesifinen tutkijan kokonaisarvio (ss-IGA) -pisteet >=3 seulonnassa ja lähtötilanteessa ja/tai staattinen lääkärin yleinen sukupuolielinten arvio (sPGA-G) >=3 seulonnassa ja lähtötilanteessa ja/ tai lääkärin yleisarvio käsistä ja jaloista (hf-PGA) -pisteet >=3 seulonnassa ja lähtötilanteessa
- Ei vastannut vähintään yhteen paikalliseen hoitoon (esimerkiksi kortikosteroidit, kalsineuriinin estäjät ja/tai D-vitamiinianalogit), jota käytettiin psoriaasin hoitoon
- Plakkipsoriaasin varmistus ei-erityisellä alueella (esimerkiksi alueet paitsi päänahka, sukuelimet, kämmenjalka) seulonnassa ja lähtötilanteessa
Poissulkemiskriteerit:
- Psoriaasin ei-plakkimuoto (esimerkiksi erytroderminen, gutaattinen tai märkärakkulainen)
- Muut dermatoosit kuin plakkipsoriaasi (kuten kosketusihottuma) tai palmoplantaarinen pustuloosi (jos hf-PGA >=3 lähtötilanteessa)
- Nykyinen lääkkeiden aiheuttama psoriaasi (esimerkki, psoriaasin uusi puhkeaminen tai psoriaasin paheneminen beetasalpaajista, kalsiumkanavasalpaajista tai litiumista)
- Nykyinen diagnoosi tai merkit tai oireet vakavista, progressiivisista tai hallitsemattomista munuaisten, maksan, sydämen, verisuonten, keuhkojen, maha-suolikanavan, endokriinisistä, neurologisista, hematologisista, reumatologisista, psykiatrisista tai aineenvaihduntahäiriöistä
- Tunnettu allergia, yliherkkyys tai intoleranssi JNJ-77242113:lle tai sen apuaineille
Opintosuunnitelma
Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
- Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Hoito
- Jako: Satunnaistettu
- Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
- Naamiointi: Kaksinkertainen
Aseet ja interventiot
Osallistujaryhmä / Arm |
Interventio / Hoito |
|---|---|
|
Kokeellinen: JNJ-77242113
Osallistujat saavat JNJ-77242113 viikolta 0 viikolle 156.
|
JNJ-77242113 annetaan suun kautta.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Plasebo
Osallistujat saavat lumelääkettä viikolta 0 viikolle 16 ja sen jälkeen JNJ-77242113 viikosta 16 viikolle 156.
|
Placeboa annetaan suun kautta.
JNJ-77242113 annetaan suun kautta.
|
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis.
Lesions were graded for induration, erythema, scaling, each using 5 point scale.
Induration:0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25 millimeters(mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5
mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75
mm; 4=severe plaque elevation,>1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates.
Final IGA score was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe(4).
Higher score=more severe disease.
Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Muutos PASI-kokonaisarvosta lähtöarvoon verrattuna viikolla 16
Aikaikkuna: Perustaso (Viikko 0), Viikko 16
|
Perusarvosta tapahtunut muutos PASI-kokonaisarvossa viikolla 16 raportoitiin.
PASI oli järjestelmä, jota käytettiin psoriasisoikeuksien vakavuuden arvioimiseen ja luokitteluun sekä niiden vasteeseen hoitoon.
PASI-järjestelmässä keho jaettiin 4 alueeseen: pää, vartalo, yläraajat ja alaraajat.
Jokainen näistä alueista arvioitiin ja pisteytettiin erikseen eryteemalle, induraatiolle ja hilseilylle, jotka kukin arvioitiin asteikolla 0–4 (0=ei ollenkaan, 1=lievä, 2=kohtalainen, 3=vaikea ja 4=erittäin vaikea) sekä osallistumisen laajuudelle asteikolla 0 (ei osallistumista) – 6 (90 % – 100 % osallistuminen).
PASI tuotti numeerisen kokonaisarvon, joka saattoi vaihdella 0:sta (ei psoriasista) 72:een (maksimaalinen psoriasisuus).
Korkeampi arvo osoitti suurempaa psoriasiksen vakavuutta.
Perusarvo määriteltiin lähimmäksi mittaukseksi ennen ensimmäisen tutkimuslääkkeen annostelupäivän aikaa tai sen aikana otetuksi.
|
Perustaso (Viikko 0), Viikko 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease.
It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis).
BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported.
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy.
In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities.
Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement).
The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis).
Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL.
It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment.
Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL).
The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline mNAPSI Score >0
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at week 16 was reported.
The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis.
Each of the participant's ten fingernails were evaluated on 7 features.
The first three features were each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1 = onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2 = pitting, and 3 = nail plate crumbling.
Next four features was each scored 0 absent or 1 present, and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in lunula.
Each fingernail was rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement).
Total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement).
Higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis.
Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
Change from baseline in PSSD sign score at Week 16 was reported.
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit.
24-hour recall version was used.
PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity.
Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score.
Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items).
Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe).
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity.
Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always).
Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain).
Higher score= worst pain.
Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items.
Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score).
Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning.
Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Aikaikkuna: From Week 0 to Week 160
|
From Week 0 to Week 160
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Aikaikkuna: From Week 0 to Week 160
|
From Week 0 to Week 160
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=3
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis.
The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4.
A higher score indicated more severe disease.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) 90 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=3
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
PSSI 90 response is defined as a percentage of participants who achieved at least 90% improvement from baseline in the PSSI score.
PSSI is a physician assessment of erythema, induration and desquamation and percent of scalp that is covered with a scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe).
The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the scalp area involved, 1 (<10%) to 6 (90%-100%) with a total score ranging from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity).
Higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA Score >=3
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point.
The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions.
The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5).
Higher score indicates more severity.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=3
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet.
hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.
Higher score indicates more severity.
Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) among participants.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis.
Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale.
Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates.
Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
A higher score indicated more severe disease.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit.
24-hour recall version was used.
PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity.
Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score.
Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items).
Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe).
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit.
24-hour recall version was used.
PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity.
PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease.
Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3 and a Baseline GenPs-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
The GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days.
Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always).
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=3 and a Baseline Scalp Itch NRS Score >=4
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
The Scalp Itch NRS is a single item instrument that evaluates the severity of scalp itch in adult and adolescent populations over the past 24 hours.
The instrument uses an NRS score ranging from 0 (no scalp itch) to 10 (worst scalp itch imaginable), with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in Genital Psoriasis Symptoms Score (GPSS) Genital Itch NRS Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3 and a Baseline GPSS Genital Itch NRS Score >=4
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
The GPSS is a participant-administered assessment of 8 symptoms: itch, pain, discomfort, stinging, burning, redness, scaling, and cracking.
Each respondent is asked to answer the questions based on the psoriasis symptoms in his or her genital area.
The overall severity for each individual genital psoriasis symptom is indicated by selecting the number from an NRS of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom in the genital area in the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (no severity) to 10 (worst imaginable severity).
Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported.
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy.
In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities.
Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement).
The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis).
Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported.
The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy.
In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities.
Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement).
The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis).
Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (fPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline f-PGA Score >=2
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported.
f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1).
The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease.
A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe.
The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score of 0 at Week 8 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
Aikaikkuna: Week 8
|
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit.
24-hour recall version was used.
PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity.
Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score.
Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items).
Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe).
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 8
|
|
Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptoms Score at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported.
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit.
24-hour recall version was used.
PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity.
Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score.
Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items).
Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe).
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 4 Among Participants With a Baseline Itch Score >=4
Aikaikkuna: Week 4
|
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit.
24-hour recall version was used.
PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity.
PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease.
Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
|
Week 4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Sign Score >0
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit.
24-hour recall version was used.
PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity.
Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score.
Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items).
Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe).
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Children's Dermatological Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Adolescent Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score >1
Aikaikkuna: Week 16
|
The CDLQI was an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and was utilized in the adolescent population in this study.
The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week.
Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life.
CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much).
Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children.
The instrument is designed for use in children, is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the PROMIS-25 Pediatric Score at Week 16
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
The PROMIS-25 was utilized in the adolescent population and is a 25-item generic HRQoL survey.
Six PROMIS domains (physical function mobility, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, pain interference) are each assessed with 4 questions.
Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always).
Higher score=worst pain.
Raw scores for each domain were converted to T-scores using standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10 with an observed range 20 to 80.
For anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and pain interference, a negative change indicates an improvement while for physical function mobility and peer relationships, a positive change indicates an improvement.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Quality of Life Instrument (ppQLI) Hands Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=3
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
The ppQLI assesses impact on patient quality of life due to palmoplantar psoriasis over the past month in adult and adolescent populations.
Sixteen items evaluate hand functionality, pain, and social impact due to psoriasis.
Fourteen items evaluate foot functionality, pain, and physical limitations due to psoriasis.
All items use verbal rating scales ranging from 1 to 5. The ppQLI yields a score for hands, ranging from 16 to 80, and a score for feet, ranging from 14 to 70.
Higher score indicating more severe disease.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in ppQLI Feet Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=3
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
The ppQLI assesses impact on patient quality of life due to palmoplantar psoriasis over the past month in adult and adolescent populations.
Sixteen items evaluate hand functionality, pain, and social impact due to psoriasis.
Fourteen items evaluate foot functionality, pain, and physical limitations due to psoriasis.
All items use verbal rating scales ranging from 1 to 5. The ppQLI yields a score for hands, ranging from 16 to 80, and a score for feet, ranging from 14 to 70.
Higher score indicating more severe disease.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Genital Psoriasis Symptoms Score (GPSS) Total Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
The GPSS was a participant-administered assessment of 8 symptoms: itch, pain, discomfort, stinging, burning, redness, scaling, and cracking.
Each respondent was asked to answer the questions based on the psoriasis symptoms in his or her genital area.
The overall severity for each individual genital psoriasis symptom was indicated by selecting the number from an NRS of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom in the genital area in the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (no severity) to 10 (worst imaginable severity).
Results from each symptom assessment were summed to generate a total GPSS score ranging from 0 (no genital psoriasis symptoms) to 80 (worst imaginable genital psoriasis symptoms).
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in genital psoriasis symptoms.
The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.
Sponsori
Tutkijat
- Opintojohtaja: Janssen Research &Development, LLC Clinical trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä
Tutkimusta koskevien tietojen syöttämisestä vastaava henkilö toimittaa nämä julkaisut vapaaehtoisesti. Nämä voivat koskea mitä tahansa tutkimukseen liittyvää.
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan julkisella verkkosivustolla.
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)
Torstai 12. lokakuuta 2023
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)
Keskiviikko 19. kesäkuuta 2024
Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Keskiviikko 17. helmikuuta 2027
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Keskiviikko 18. lokakuuta 2023
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Keskiviikko 18. lokakuuta 2023
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)
Maanantai 23. lokakuuta 2023
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)
Perjantai 28. elokuuta 2026
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Torstai 27. elokuuta 2026
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lauantai 1. elokuuta 2026
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- 77242113PSO3003 (Muu tunniste: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)
Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?
JOO
IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus
Johnson & Johnsonin Janssen Pharmaceutical Companiesin tiedonjakopolitiikka on saatavilla osoitteessa www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency.
Kuten tällä sivustolla mainitaan, tutkimustietoihin pääsyä koskevat pyynnöt voidaan lähettää Yale Open Data Access (YODA) -projektisivuston kautta osoitteessa yoda.yale.edu
Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta
Joo
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta
Ei
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .