Driving Pressure Limited Ventilation During Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Feasiblity of a Driving Pressure Limited Ventilation vs.Standard Strategy During Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Liu gongjian, M.D/Ph.D
- Phone Number: +86-13952203528
- Email: liugongjian61@hotmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China, 221000
- Recruiting
- The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
-
Contact:
- Liu gongjian, M.D/Ph.D
- Phone Number: +86-13952203528
- Email: liugongjian61@hotmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults greater than or equal to 18 years
- ARISCAT(Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia)≥26 points
- Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification greater than or equal to 4
- Emergency surgery
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Forced vital capacity or forced expiratory volume in 1 sec < 70% of the predicted values
- Coagulation disorder
- Pulmonary or extrapulmonary infections
- History of treatment with steroid in 3 months before surgery
- History of recurrent pneumothorax
- History of lung resection surgery
- History of mechanical ventilation in 2 weeks
- Body Mass Index[≥35 kg/m2 ]
- Patient who is contraindicated with application of positive end expiratory pressure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Protective Ventilation 1
Intraoperatively ventilated patients with a tidal volume (VT) of 10 ml/kg of ideal body weight, the level of PEEP at 0 cmH2O and a FiO2 of100%.
|
Low tidal volume, high inspired oygen fraction (FiO2) and recruitment maneuver.
|
|
Active Comparator: Protective Ventilation 2
Intraoperatively ventilated patients with a tidal volume (VT) of 6 ml/kg of ideal body weight, the level of PEEP at 5cmH2O and a FiO2 of 60% with lung recruitment maneuvers.
|
Low tidal volume, PEEP, moderate inspired oygen fraction (FiO2) and recruitment maneuver.
|
|
Experimental: Driving Pressure Limited Ventilation
The intervention arm receives driving pressure limited ventilation during one-lung ventilation
|
Positive end expiratory pressure is adjusted to minimize driving pressure, plateau pressure minus end expiratory pressure from 3 to 10 cmH2O during one-lung ventilation and a FiO2 of 60%
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications
Time Frame: within the first 3 days after surgery
|
Patient is regarded to have postoperative pulmonary complication when 4 or more positive variables exists according to Melbourne Group Scale.
|
within the first 3 days after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood
Time Frame: 15 min after induction, 20 and 60 min after start of one-lung ventilation, 15 min after restart of two-lung ventilation, 1 hour after the end of surgery
|
15 min after induction, 20 and 60 min after start of one-lung ventilation, 15 min after restart of two-lung ventilation, 1 hour after the end of surgery
|
|
|
respiratory compliance
Time Frame: during surgery
|
Dynamic compliance, Static compliance
|
during surgery
|
|
TNF-α
Time Frame: the start of one-lung ventilation, 1 hour of one-lung ventilation and the end of one-lung ventilation
|
the start of one-lung ventilation, 1 hour of one-lung ventilation and the end of one-lung ventilation
|
|
|
IL-8
Time Frame: the start of one-lung ventilation, 1 hour of one-lung ventilation and the end of one-lung ventilation
|
the start of one-lung ventilation, 1 hour of one-lung ventilation and the end of one-lung ventilation
|
|
|
ICU mortality
Time Frame: Patients will be followed during the period of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days
|
Patients will be followed during the period of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days
|
|
|
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: Patients will be followed during the period of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days
|
Patients will be followed during the period of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days
|
|
|
28-day survival
Time Frame: From day 0 to day 28
|
From day 0 to day 28
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Mazo V, Sabate S, Canet J, Gallart L, de Abreu MG, Belda J, Langeron O, Hoeft A, Pelosi P. Prospective external validation of a predictive score for postoperative pulmonary complications. Anesthesiology. 2014 Aug;121(2):219-31. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000334.
- Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic O, El-Tahan MR, Ghamdi AA, Gunay E, Jaber S, Kokulu S, Kozian A, Licker M, Lin WQ, Maslow AD, Memtsoudis SG, Reis Miranda D, Moine P, Ng T, Paparella D, Ranieri VM, Scavonetto F, Schilling T, Selmo G, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Sundar S, Talmor D, Treschan T, Unzueta C, Weingarten TN, Wolthuis EK, Wrigge H, Amato MB, Costa EL, de Abreu MG, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROVE Network Investigators. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Apr;4(4):272-80. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00057-6. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Erratum In: Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jun;4(6):e34.
- Agostini P, Cieslik H, Rathinam S, Bishay E, Kalkat MS, Rajesh PB, Steyn RS, Singh S, Naidu B. Postoperative pulmonary complications following thoracic surgery: are there any modifiable risk factors? Thorax. 2010 Sep;65(9):815-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.123083.
- Hager DN. Recent Advances in the Management of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Clin Chest Med. 2015 Sep;36(3):481-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
- Guerin C, Papazian L, Reignier J, Ayzac L, Loundou A, Forel JM; investigators of the Acurasys and Proseva trials. Effect of driving pressure on mortality in ARDS patients during lung protective mechanical ventilation in two randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2016 Nov 29;20(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1556-2.
- Loring SH, Malhotra A. Driving pressure and respiratory mechanics in ARDS. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):776-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1414218. No abstract available.
- Xie J, Jin F, Pan C, Liu S, Liu L, Xu J, Yang Y, Qiu H. The effects of low tidal ventilation on lung strain correlate with respiratory system compliance. Crit Care. 2017 Feb 3;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1600-x.
- Grieco DL, Chen L, Dres M, Brochard L. Should we use driving pressure to set tidal volume? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Feb;23(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000377.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- XYFY-2017-033
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Thoracic Surgery
-
NCT06159517TerminatedCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Thoracic Surgery | Vascular Surgery
-
NCT02964026CompletedCardiac Surgery | Thoracic Surgery | Heart Surgery | Heart Transplant
-
NCT07184463RecruitingThoracic Surgery | Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery | Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery
-
NCT00247793CompletedCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Thoracic Surgery
-
NCT02927860TerminatedThoracic Surgery | Surgery, Thoracic
-
NCT07255703Not yet recruitingThoracic Surgery
-
NCT07345013CompletedThoracic Surgery
-
NCT04559347Terminated
-
NCT05695404Completed
Clinical Trials on Protective ventilation 1
-
NCT03174743UnknownInflammation | Thoracic Surgery | Pulmonary Complication
-
NCT04390360RecruitingMechanical Ventilation Complication | ARDS, Human | Humidifier Lung
-
NCT04349618CompletedPneumonia | Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | COVID19 | Sars-CoV2
-
NCT05708365CompletedARDS | Acute Respiratory Failure
-
NCT01630395CompletedInflammation | Mechanical Ventilation Complication | Thoracic Surgery
-
NCT07077174RecruitingMechanical Ventilation | Intensive Care (ICU)
-
NCT02700581UnknownValvular Heart Disease
-
NCT02450019CompletedNervous System Neoplasms
-
NCT05525312Recruiting
-
NCT00750204TerminatedAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Acute Lung Injury | Mechanical Ventilation