Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Clinic-based Physical Activity Coaching Intervention in People With Premanifest and Early Stage HD

May 29, 2019 updated by: Teachers College, Columbia University

Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Clinic-based Physical Activity Coaching Intervention in People With Premanifest and Early Stage Huntington's Disease

This study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a clinic-based physical activity coaching intervention in people with pre-manifest and early stage Huntington's Disease (HD). Fourteen individuals with premanifest and early stage HD will be recruited to participate in a 4 month coaching intervention. Feasibility will be assessed by recruitment and retention rates, and acceptability will be assessed by participant interviews. Participants will also be evaluate at baseline and following the coaching intervention to explore preliminary efficacy in terms of physical activity, self efficacy, disease-specific motor and cognitive function, walking endurance and strength.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators have previously developed and evaluated a physical activity behavioral change intervention in people with early-mid stage HD (Engage-HD). In a study conducted in the United Kingdom, self-reported physical activity, self-efficacy for exercise, and cognition were increased for those in the coaching intervention group compared to a social contact control group. This intervention has not yet been applied to individuals with pre-manifest (prior to onset of clinical symptoms) and early stage HD, where it may be most critical to engage in exercise. To date, no study has prospectively evaluated a physical activity intervention to facilitate exercise uptake in these earliest stages. This study will explore the feasibility and acceptability of the Engage-HD intervention in 14 individuals with pre-manifest and early stage HD. The intervention will entail one face-to-face coaching session (approximately 1 hour), and three remote video sessions (via secure Webex connection via computer or smart phone, or phone call if internet/smart phone is not available to participant) lasting approximately 20 minutes. Participants will also be given FitBit wearable activity monitors to allow for self- monitoring of physical activity for use during the 4-month intervention. Participants will be evaluated at baseline and again 4 months later on a range of exploratory outcomes including physical activity, self efficacy, disease-specific motor and cognitive function, walking endurance and strength. Results from this study will be used to make relevant adaptations to prepare for a multi-site randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
14

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10027
        • Columbia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For premanifest - Confirmatory genetic testing for Huntington disease (HD) and diagnostic confidence score of 0-3 on Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale, indicating pre-manifest disease state. For manifest HD - Confirmatory genetic testing for HD or confirmed clinical diagnosis of HD by neurologist
  • Successful completion of Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q), or medical clearance from General Practioner
  • For potential participants over age 60, a minimum score of 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (completed within 3 months) will be required for capacity to consent.
  • For potential participants age 60-65, successful pass of electrocardiogram screen will be required.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Musculoskeletal injury that would interfere with participation in an exercise program
  • Currently participating in a structured exercise program 3 times per week or more
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric or behavioral problems that would interfere with participation in an exercise program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Physical Activity Coaching Intervention
The intervention will entail one face-to-face coaching session (approximately 1 hour) to be held approximately 1 week following the baseline assessment, and three remote video sessions (via secure Webex connection via computer or smart phone, or phone call if internet/smart phone is not available to participant) lasting approximately 20 minutes.
Other: Physical Activity Coaching
Physical activity coaching over 4 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in physical activity (daily step counts) at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
Physical activity as measured by waist worn device (Actigraph)
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) metabolic equivalent of task at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
Questionnaire evaluating level of physical activity over past 7 days
4 months
Change in Lorig self efficacy scale at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
Self efficacy questionnaire
4 months
Change in 6 minute walk distance at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
Endurance measured by 6 minute walk test - distance completed over 6 minutes of walking
4 months
Change in grip strength at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
Hand strength as measured with hand held dynamometer
4 months
Change in HD-PRO-TRIAD at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
Questionnaire evaluating disease-specific measure of HD symptoms (cognitive, emotional and motor function)
4 months
Change in Unified Huntington Disease rating scale Total Motor Score at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
Disease-specific measure of motor function
4 months
Change in Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ 2) at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
A 19 item questionnaire measuring stages of self determination continuum
4 months
Change in Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale Cognitive battery at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
Disease-specific cognitive function as measured by Unified Huntington Disease Cognitive battery (Stroop, Symbol digit modality and verbal fluency)
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Teachers College, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 546845

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Huntington's Disease

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity Coaching

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings