Chiropractic Dosage for Lumbar Stenosis

October 7, 2011 updated by: Jerrilyn Cambron, DC, PhD, National University of Health Sciences
This randomized clinical trial pilot study will investigate the efficacy of different amounts of total treatment dosage over six weeks in 60 volunteer subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis. Subjects will be evenly randomized into four groups of either flexion distraction (FD) care or a control: Group 1 with 8 total FD treatment visits, Group 2 with 12 total FD treatment visits, Group 3 with 18 total FD treatment visits, or Group 4 with 8 total placebo control visits. The study is designed: (1) To determine the feasibility of a larger scale study in terms of logistics, recruitment efforts, and sample size estimations and (2) To determine among the three treatment groups the change in perceived pain levels and general functional health status at the end of six weeks of treatment and at three months post care as follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Lombard, Illinois, United States, 60148
        • National University of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females at least 50 years old with lumbar spinal stenosis
  • Impingement of the cord and/or exiting nerve roots evidenced on spine imaging studies
  • Symptomatic with current pain in the back and/or one or both of the legs.
  • Symptoms must have been present for at least six months with an insidious onset

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital stenosis or other spine deformities such as current spinal fractures, spinal infections, or tumors of the spine
  • Prior lumbar spine surgery such as laminectomy, spinal fusion, or discectomy that lacks stability or occurred within the past 3 months.
  • Currently pregnant or nursing
  • Co-morbid conditions that may preclude a person from participating in active care (laying prone on a treatment table or completing exercises) and outcome measures (Treadmill Testing, completion of questionnaires), such as severe cardiopulmonary disorders (i.e.: severe coronary artery disease, recent myocardial infarction, or vascular claudication), neuromusculoskeletal disorders (i.e.: disabling hip or knee arthritis; trochanteric bursitis; piriformis syndrome; need for assisted ambulation), or brain disorders (i.e.: dementia or Alzheimer's Disease)
  • Active conservative care such as physical therapy or chiropractic care for lumbar stenosis (excluding the use of oral medications or daily at-home exercises for general well-being)
  • Cauda equina symptoms (i.e.: perianal numbness; loss of bowel and/or bladder control)
  • Not fluent or literate in the English language. We will not be able to provide multiple translators within this pilot study
  • Current or future litigation for low back or leg pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
8 flexion distraction visits
Chiropractic treatment using the flexion distraction apparatus
Active Comparator: 2
12 flexion distraction visits
Chiropractic treatment using the flexion distraction apparatus
Active Comparator: 3
18 flexion distraction visits
Chiropractic treatment using the flexion distraction apparatus
Placebo Comparator: 4
8 placebo control visits
Placebo for comparison with flexion distraction treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks; 3 and 6 months
6 weeks; 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Functional health status
Time Frame: 6 weeks; 3 and 6 months
6 weeks; 3 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jerrilyn Cambron, DC, PhD, National University of Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

September 11, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 12, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on flexion distraction

3
Subscribe