Mother-Infant Psychoanalysis Project of Stockholm (MIPPS)

January 27, 2021 updated by: Bjorn Salomonsson, Karolinska Institutet

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mother-Infant Psychoanalytic Treatment (MIP) and Treatment As Usual (TAU) at Child Health Centres (CHC)

Mother-infant relationship disturbances broadly comprise three areas; maternal distress, infant functional problems, and relationship difficulties. Given the high frequency of such disturbances and the relative paucity of randomized treatment studies, substantial systematic investigation is needed. This project is a randomized controlled study comparing mother-infant psychoanalytic treatment with treatment as usual in cases where mothers and/or health visitors demanded expert help.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

DESIGN

Eighty dyads with infants below 1½ years of age were interviewed and then randomly assigned to MIP or TAU. An end-point interview followed after ½ year, evaluating the intervention effects.

The MIP treatments were performed by IPA psychoanalysts at the Infant Reception Service of the Swedish Psychoanalytic Society. TAU implied contact with a nurse at a Child Health Centre, as part of regular Swedish health care of infants and mothers. Additional treatments within the TAU framework suggested at the initiative by the health visitor or the mother were registered at the end-point interview.

INSTRUMENTS

Mother-report questionnaires; the Ages and Stages Questionnaire:Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE; Squires et al., 2002), the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Cox et al., 1987), the General Severity Index of the Symptom Check List-90 (Derogatis, 1994)and the Swedish Parental Questionnaire (SPSQ; Östberg et al., 1997).

Time frame: All four instruments were measured at intake interviews and six months later.

Independently rated video-taped mother-infant interactions: the Emotional Availability Scale (EAS; Biringen, 1998).

Relationship assessment: the Parent-Infant Relationship Global Assessment Scale (PIR-GAS; ZERO-TO-THREE, 2005).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 17176
        • Karolinska Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The mother expressed significant concerns about one or more of the following domains: herself as a mother, her infant's well-being, or the mother-baby relationship (this was operationalized as a score < 80 ("perturbed relation") on the PIR-GAS or, alternatively, > 2.5 on the SPSQ).
  • Infant of any gender, age below 18 months.
  • Duration of worries exceeding two weeks.
  • Domicile in Stockholm.
  • Reasonable mastery of Swedish.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Maternal psychosis.
  • Substance dependence according to DSM-IV, to an extent precluding collaboration.

No mothers met these criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mother-Infant Psychoanalytic treatment;MIP
MIP intervention
MIP (Norman, 2001; 2004) is a psychoanalytic method adapted to the requirements of the infant as analysand in the presence of his mother. In the study, the analysts strived to recruit the baby for an emotional interchange, though this did not imply any belief that the infant would understand verbal communication. Rather, the analyst addressed the baby to help him liberate emotions consolidated in symptoms such as screaming, avoiding maternal eye contact, and breast refusal. The analyst took care in enrolling the participant mother. This was to enhance her understanding of the baby's predicament and the nature of their relation, as well as giving her space to vent her own frustration, depression and anxiety.
Active Comparator: TAU at Child Health Centres
Regular nurse visits at Child Health Centres according to Swedish infant health care.
Treatment as usual (TAU) involved scheduled nurse calls at the local Child Health Centre (CHC), with paediatric checkups at 2 and 6 months of age. The nurse is encouraged to promote attachment and to detect postnatal depressions. Mothers might be offered parental groups, infant massage or guidance promoting interaction, as well as appointments with a paediatrician or a child psychiatric psychologist. Within the TAU framework, additional treatment might be initiated by the nurse or the mother. This was registered at the end-point interview.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Parent-Infant Relationship Global Assessment Scale (PIR-GAS; ZERO-TO-THREE, 2005)
Time Frame: Two interviews, six months apart
An observer-rated scale ranging from 0 to 99, from "documented maltreatment" to "well-adapted". Higher scores indicate a better outcome. Inter-rater reliability was measured with an external experienced infant psychotherapist.
Two interviews, six months apart
the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Cox et al., 1987)
Time Frame: Two interviews, six months apart
The EPDS (Swedish translation, Lundh & Gylland, 1990), is a self-report questionnaire containing 10 items each with a 3-point scale. Range: 0 - 30. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. It is widely used at Swedish CHCs and has been validated on samples in Sweden.
Two interviews, six months apart
the Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional, (ASQ:SE; Squires et al., 2002
Time Frame: Two interviews, six months apart
Items are mostly rated on a 4-step scale, with 0,5,10 or 15 points per item, where 0 is most optimal. There are three versions for the age ranges of this study: 3-8, 9-14, and 15-20 months. To enable comparison across age groups we report mean scores across all items. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. Each version was independently translated into Swedish, retranslated and approved by the constructor.
Two interviews, six months apart

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the Swedish Parental Stress Questionnaire, (SPSQ; Östberg et al., 1997)
Time Frame: Two interviews six months apart
A Swedish-language version of the Parenting Stress Index (PSI; Abidin, 1990) with 35 items, each ranging 1-5 points. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Two interviews six months apart
the Emotional Availability Scales, Subscale on Sensitivity (EAS; Biringen, 1998)
Time Frame: Two interviews, six months apart
The EAS assessed video-taped mother-baby interactions of 10' duration on three maternal dimensions (Sensitivity, Structuring, Non-intrusiveness) and two infant dimensions (Responsiveness and Involvement. The raw scores of the subscales have different ranges (0-5, 0-7, and 0-9). To enable comparison across subscales, we divided scores in each subscale with its maximal score. This yielded a range for each subscale of 0-1.Thus, the total score range for all subscales was 0-1, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Here we report results on Sensitivity.
Two interviews, six months apart
General Severity Index of the Symptom Check List-90
Time Frame: two assessments at six month-interval
The Symptom Check List-90 (SCL-90; Derogatis, 1994), with a Swedish language version (Fridell, Cesarec, Johansson, & Malling Thorsen, 2002), is a self-report questionnaire containing 90 items rated from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The General Severity Index (GSI, or the mean across all items) was used to measure maternal general psychological distress.
two assessments at six month-interval

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Per-Anders Rydelius, Professor, Karolinska Institutet

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MIPPS-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mother-infant Relational Disturbances

Clinical Trials on Mother-Infant Psychoanalytic treatment (MIP)

3
Subscribe