Lidocaine For Neuroprotection During Cardiac Surgery

The purpose of this study is to see if a drug called lidocaine prevents cognitive injury (a decline in mental abilities) after heart surgery. Lidocaine is currently FDA approved and is commonly used for treating some heart rhythm disorders and for regional anesthesia (blocking nerves). The investigators are enrolling subjects in this research project to see if lidocaine will reduce the high incidence of cognitive injury seen after heart surgery. As part of this study, the investigators will also evaluate the relationship between cognitive injury and genetic makeup and the chemical changes in the subjects blood during and after surgery.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Cognitive Decline
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Lidocaine; Drug: Placebo

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 550
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • North Carolina
    • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
      • Duke University Medical Center
  • Virginia
    • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
      • Sentara Cardiovascular Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. CABG, CABG + Valve, or Valve surgery
2. Use of cardiopulmonary bypass

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Less than 50 years of age
2. History of diabetes
3. History of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease (e.g. prior stroke) with residual deficit
4. Alcoholism (> 2 drinks/day)
5. History of psychiatric illness (any clinical diagnoses requiring therapy)
6. History of drug abuse (any illicit drug use in the past 3 months)
7. Hepatic insufficiency (liver function tests > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal)
8. Severe pulmonary insufficiency (requiring home oxygen therapy)
9. Renal failure (baseline serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl)
10. Pregnant women
11. Unable to read and thus unable to complete the cognitive testing
12. Score < 24 on a baseline Mini Mental State examination (MMSE) or greater than or equal to 27 on the baseline Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale -

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lidocaine; Lidocaine infusion for 48 hours	Drug: Lidocaine; Lidocaine versus placebo infusion for 48 hours
Placebo Comparator: Placebo; Normal saline infusion for 48 hours	Drug: Placebo; Lidocaine versus placebo infusion for 48 hours

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline Characterized as Continuous Cognitive Change	To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the 5 preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week cognitive index. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with standard deviation of 0.35. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement.	Preoperative to 6 weeks after surgery
Count of Participants With a Decline of Greater Than or Equal to One Standard Deviation in One or More of Five Cognitive Domain Scores Reported as a Dichotomous Post-operative Cognitive Deficit (POCD) Outcome	To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. Each domain score is normally distributed with a mean of zero. A change score was calculated for each domain by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week score. A dichotomous outcome variable of post-operative cognitive deficit was defined as a decline of ≥1 standard deviation in 1 or more of the 5 domains.	Preoperative to 6 weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Platelets	Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removalime points and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups	Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Neutrophils	Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removal and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups	Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Monocytes	Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removalime points and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups	Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Transcerebral Activation Gradient of Platelet-neutrophil Conjugates	Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removalime points and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups	Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline	To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the 5 preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 1 year cognitive index. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with standard deviation of 0.35. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement	1 year after surgery
Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)	The DASI is a 12-item scale of functional capacity that has been found to correlate well with objective measures of maximal exercise capacity. Items reflect activities of personal care, ambulation, household tasks, sexual function, and recreational activities. Activities done "with no difficulty" receive scores, which are weighted and summed, for a quantitative measure of functional status. Scores range from 0 to 60; a higher-weighted score indicates better function.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)	The DASI is a 12-item scale of functional capacity that has been found to correlate well with objective measures of maximal exercise capacity. Items reflect activities of personal care, ambulation, household tasks, sexual function, and recreational activities. Activities done "with no difficulty" receive scores, which are weighted and summed, for a quantitative measure of functional status. Scores range from 0 to 60; a higher-weighted score indicates better function.	baseline, 1-year
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)	The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. The range of scores is from 0 (normal) to 42 (profound effect of stroke on patient).	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)	The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. The range of scores is from 0 (normal) to 42 (profound effect of stroke on patient).	baseline, 1-year
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)	Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D is a 20-item self-report examination designed to measure symptoms of depression. Subjects rate the degree to which they have experienced a range of symptoms of depression, such as "I had crying spells" and "I felt lonely." Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. Scores greater than 16 are typically considered indicative of clinically significant depression.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)	Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D is a 20-item self-report examination designed to measure symptoms of depression. Subjects rate the degree to which they have experienced a range of symptoms of depression, such as "I had crying spells" and "I felt lonely." Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. Scores greater than 16 are typically considered indicative of clinically significant depression.	baseline, 1-year
Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)	Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI): The STAI consists of two 20-item scales that measure anxiety. Representative items include statements such as "I feel nervous" and "I feel worried." These items are rated on a 4-point scale, based on how well they describe the patient's current or typical mood, from "not at all" to "very much so." Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)	Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI): The STAI consists of two 20-item scales that measure anxiety. Representative items include statements such as "I feel nervous" and "I feel worried." These items are rated on a 4-point scale, based on how well they describe the patient's current or typical mood, from "not at all" to "very much so." Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.	baseline, 1-year
Change in Symptom Limitations	Symptom limitations: Patients were given a list of eight symptoms and asked to rate the degree to which the symptom limited daily activities. The symptoms were angina, shortness of breath, arthritis, back trouble, leg pains, headaches, fatigue, and other. Scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater limitations.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Symptom Limitations	Symptom limitations: Patients were given a list of eight symptoms and asked to rate the degree to which the symptom limited daily activities. The symptoms were angina, shortness of breath, arthritis, back trouble, leg pains, headaches, fatigue, and other. Scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater limitations.	baseline, 1-year
Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)	Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL): This measure contains six items that assess the ability to perform important tasks for daily living (e.g., "Could you prepare your own meals?" "Could you drive a car?"). Scores range from 6 to 24. Higher scores indicate increasing difficulty in engaging in daily activities.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)	Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL): This measure contains six items that assess the ability to perform important tasks for daily living (e.g., "Could you prepare your own meals?" "Could you drive a car?"). Scores range from 6 to 24. Higher scores indicate increasing difficulty in engaging in daily activities.	baseline, 1-year
Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale	Cognitive Difficulties Scale: a 39-item scale, is a self-report assessment of perceived problems in long- and short-term memory, concentration, attention, and psycho-motor coordination. Sample items are "I forget errands I planned to do" and "I fail to recognize people I know." Scores range from 39 to 164, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive difficulty.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale	Cognitive Difficulties Scale: a 39-item scale, is a self-report assessment of perceived problems in long- and short-term memory, concentration, attention, and psycho-motor coordination. Sample items are "I forget errands I planned to do" and "I fail to recognize people I know." Scores range from 39 to 164, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive difficulty.	baseline, 1-year
Change in Perceived Social Support	Perceived Social Support Scale: Twelve items indicate how strongly subjects agree that there is "a special person who is around when I am in need" and "my family really tries to help me." Choices range from "very strongly disagree" to "very strongly agree." Items are summed for a range of 12 to 84, with a high score meaning more social support.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Perceived Social Support	Perceived Social Support Scale: Twelve items indicate how strongly subjects agree that there is "a special person who is around when I am in need" and "my family really tries to help me." Choices range from "very strongly disagree" to "very strongly agree." Items are summed for a range of 12 to 84, with a high score meaning more social support.	baseline, 1-year
Change in Social Activity	Social Activity: This measure consisted of eight items that indicate the degree of social interaction. Sample items are "How often do you talk on the telephone with friends and relatives?" and "How often do you attend meetings of social groups, clubs, or civic organizations?" Scores range from 8 to 32. A lower score indicates more social activity.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Social Activity	Social Activity: This measure consisted of eight items that indicate the degree of social interaction. Sample items are "How often do you talk on the telephone with friends and relatives?" and "How often do you attend meetings of social groups, clubs, or civic organizations?" Scores range from 8 to 32. A lower score indicates more social activity.	baseline, 1-year
Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)	The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): The SF-36 was designed to measure general health status. Two scales were used: Work Activities (four items) and General Health (one item). For the work activities scale, the reported score was the sum of four questions, each with values ranging from 1 to 4, the total score could range from 4 to 16. A higher score on Work Activities indicates more health-related problems For the general health question, the patients ranked their health from Excellent (1) to poor (5), the scale ranged from 1 to 5 with 1 being best health and 5 being worst. A high score in General Health indicates poorer health state.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)	The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): The SF-36 was designed to measure general health status. Two scales were used: Work Activities (four items) and General Health (one item). For the work activities scale, the reported score was the sum of four questions, each with values ranging from 1 to 4, the total score could range from 4 to 16. A higher score on Work Activities indicates more health-related problems For the general health question, the patients ranked their health from Excellent (1) to poor (5), the scale ranged from 1 to 5 with 1 being best health and 5 being worst. A high score in General Health indicates poorer health state.	baseline, 1-year
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)	The Western perioperative neurologic scale was designed to detect neurologic deficits after cardiac surgery. It includes 14 items classified into eight domains (mentation, speech, cranial nerve function, motor weakness, sensation and cerebellum, reflexes, and gait). Each item is scored from 0 (severe deficit) to3 (normal), and a maximum score of 42 indicates normal neurological function.	baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)	The Western perioperative neurologic scale was designed to detect neurologic deficits after cardiac surgery. It includes 14 items classified into eight domains (mentation, speech, cranial nerve function, motor weakness, sensation and cerebellum, reflexes, and gait). Each item is scored from 0 (severe deficit) to3 (normal), and a maximum score of 42 indicates normal neurological function.	baseline, 1-year

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Duke University
• Collaborators: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Joseph P Mathew, M. D., Duke University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Ruff RM, Parker SB. Gender- and age-specific changes in motor speed and eye-hand coordination in adults: normative values for the Finger Tapping and Grooved Pegboard Tests. Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Jun;76(3 Pt 2):1219-30. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.76.3c.1219.
• Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, Cobb FR, Pryor DB. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 15;64(10):651-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90496-7.
• Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, Mark DB, Reves JG, Blumenthal JA; Neurological Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Research Endeavors Investigators. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 8;344(6):395-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102083440601. Erratum In: N Engl J Med 2001 Jun 14;344(24):1876.
• Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, Fallen EL, Pugsley SO, Taylor DW, Berman LB. The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Apr 15;132(8):919-23.
• Wassertheil-Smoller S, Blaufox MD, Oberman A, Davis BR, Swencionis C, Knerr MO, Hawkins CM, Langford HG. Effect of antihypertensives on sexual function and quality of life: the TAIM Study. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 15;114(8):613-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-613.
• Murkin JM, Newman SP, Stump DA, Blumenthal JA. Statement of consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 May;59(5):1289-95. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00106-u. No abstract available.
• Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, White WD, Landolfo K, Reves JG, Laskowitz DT, Mark DB, Blumenthal JA; Neurologic Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesia Research Endeavors (CARE) Investigators of the Duke Heart Center. Report of the substudy assessing the impact of neurocognitive function on quality of life 5 years after cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2001 Dec 1;32(12):2874-81. doi: 10.1161/hs1201.099803.
• Phillips-Bute B, Mathew JP, Blumenthal JA, Grocott HP, Laskowitz DT, Jones RH, Mark DB, Newman MF. Association of neurocognitive function and quality of life 1 year after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Psychosom Med. 2006 May-Jun;68(3):369-75. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000221272.77984.e2.
• Mathew JP, Mackensen GB, Phillips-Bute B, Grocott HP, Glower DD, Laskowitz DT, Blumenthal JA, Newman MF; Neurologic Outcome Research Group (NORG) of the Duke Heart Center. Randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled study of neuroprotection with lidocaine in cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):880-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.531236. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
• Evans DE, Kobrine AI, LeGrys DC, Bradley ME. Protective effect of lidocaine in acute cerebral ischemia induced by air embolism. J Neurosurg. 1984 Feb;60(2):257-63. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.60.2.0257.
• Mitchell SJ. Lidocaine in the treatment of decompression illness: a review of the literature. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2001 Fall;28(3):165-74.
• Astrup J, Sorensen PM, Sorensen HR. Inhibition of cerebral oxygen and glucose consumption in the dog by hypothermia, pentobarbital, and lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 1981 Sep;55(3):263-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198109000-00013.
• Weber ML, Taylor CP. Damage from oxygen and glucose deprivation in hippocampal slices is prevented by tetrodotoxin, lidocaine and phenytoin without blockade of action potentials. Brain Res. 1994 Nov 21;664(1-2):167-77. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91967-4.
• Ayad M, Verity MA, Rubinstein EH. Lidocaine delays cortical ischemic depolarization: relationship to electrophysiologic recovery and neuropathology. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1994 Apr;6(2):98-110. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199404000-00005.
• LoPachin RM, Gaughan CL, Lehning EJ, Weber ML, Taylor CP. Effects of ion channel blockade on the distribution of Na, K, Ca and other elements in oxygen-glucose deprived CA1 hippocampal neurons. Neuroscience. 2001;103(4):971-83. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00035-5.
• Zhang Y, Lipton P. Cytosolic Ca2+ changes during in vitro ischemia in rat hippocampal slices: major roles for glutamate and Na+-dependent Ca2+ release from mitochondria. J Neurosci. 1999 May 1;19(9):3307-15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-09-03307.1999.
• Fujitani T, Adachi N, Miyazaki H, Liu K, Nakamura Y, Kataoka K, Arai T. Lidocaine protects hippocampal neurons against ischemic damage by preventing increase of extracellular excitatory amino acids: a microdialysis study in Mongolian gerbils. Neurosci Lett. 1994 Sep 26;179(1-2):91-4. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90942-3.
• Diaz L, Gomez A, Bustos G. Lidocaine reduces the hypoxia-induced release of an excitatory amino acid analog from rat striatal slices in superfusion. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;19(5):943-53. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(95)00122-c.
• Dutka AJ, Mink R, McDermott J, Clark JB, Hallenbeck JM. Effect of lidocaine on somatosensory evoked response and cerebral blood flow after canine cerebral air embolism. Stroke. 1992 Oct;23(10):1515-20; discussion 1520-1. doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.10.1515.
• Evans DE, Kobrine AI. Reduction of experimental intracranial hypertension by lidocaine. Neurosurgery. 1987 Apr;20(4):542-7. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198704000-00006.
• Shokunbi MT, Gelb AW, Peerless SJ, Mervart M, Floyd P. An evaluation of the effect of lidocaine in experimental focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1986 Sep-Oct;17(5):962-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.5.962.
• Sakabe T, Maekawa T, Ishikawa T, Takeshita H. The effects of lidocaine on canine cerebral metabolism and circulation related to the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology. 1974 May;40(5):433-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197405000-00004. No abstract available.
• Johns RA, DiFazio CA, Longnecker DE. Lidocaine constricts or dilates rat arterioles in a dose-dependent manner. Anesthesiology. 1985 Feb;62(2):141-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198502000-00008.
• Lei B, Popp S, Capuano-Waters C, Cottrell JE, Kass IS. Lidocaine attenuates apoptosis in the ischemic penumbra and reduces infarct size after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Neuroscience. 2004;125(3):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.02.034.
• MacGregor RR, Thorner RE, Wright DM. Lidocaine inhibits granulocyte adherence and prevents granulocyte delivery to inflammatory sites. Blood. 1980 Aug;56(2):203-9. No abstract available.
• Schmidt W, Schmidt H, Bauer H, Gebhard MM, Martin E. Influence of lidocaine on endotoxin-induced leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion and macromolecular leakage in vivo. Anesthesiology. 1997 Sep;87(3):617-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199709000-00023.
• Lan W, Harmon D, Wang JH, Ghori K, Shorten G, Redmond P. The effect of lidocaine on in vitro neutrophil and endothelial adhesion molecule expression induced by plasma obtained during tourniquet-induced ischaemia and reperfusion. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Nov;21(11):892-7. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504000249.
• Mitchell SJ, Benson M, Vadlamudi L, Miller P. Cerebral arterial gas embolism by helium: an unusual case successfully treated with hyperbaric oxygen and lidocaine. Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;35(3):300-3. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70086-2.
• Mitchell SJ, Pellett O, Gorman DF. Cerebral protection by lidocaine during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Apr;67(4):1117-24. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00057-0.
• Wang D, Wu X, Li J, Xiao F, Liu X, Meng M. The effect of lidocaine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002 Nov;95(5):1134-41, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00002.
• Rey A. L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paper presented at : Presses Universitaires de France, 1964; Paris
• Randt C, Brown E. Administration Manual: Randt Memory Test. New Youk Life Sciences Associates; 1983
• Wechsler D. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Sacle-Revised (Manual): Psychological Corporation: 1981.
• Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills, 1958; 8:271-276
• Murkin JM, Stump DA, Blumenthal JA, McKhann G. Defining dysfunction: group means versus incidence analysis--a statement of consensus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Sep;64(3):904-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00743-1. No abstract available.
• Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, Welch KM, Mascha EJ, Levine S, Haley EC, Grotta J, Marler J. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1994 Nov;25(11):2220-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.11.2220.
• Roach GW, Newman MF, Murkin JM, Martzke J, Ruskin A, Li J, Guo A, Wisniewski A, Mangano DT. Ineffectiveness of burst suppression therapy in mitigating perioperative cerebrovascular dysfunction. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (McSPI) Research Group. Anesthesiology. 1999 May;90(5):1255-64. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199905000-00006.
• Mark DB, Nelson C, Delong E, et al. Comparisin of quality of life outcomes following coronary angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery and medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21:216A
• Cleary PD, Greenfield S, McNeil BJ. Assessing quality of life after surgery. Control Clin Trials. 1991 Aug;12(4 Suppl):189S-203S. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(05)80023-6.
• Ware JE Jr. Standards for validating health measures: definition and content. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):473-80. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90003-8.
• Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook EF, Loscalzo A. Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation. 1981 Dec;64(6):1227-34. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.6.1227.
• McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health: A Guide To Rating Scales And Questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987.
• Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):787-805. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001.
• Cronbach LJ. Essentials of Psycological Testing. New York: Harper and Row; 1970
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J R Statist Soc B. 1995;57(1):289-300
• Klinger RY, Cooter M, Berger M, Podgoreanu MV, Stafford-Smith M, Ortel TL, Welsby IJ, Levy JH, Rinder HM, Newman MF, Mathew JP; Neurologic Outcomes Research Group (NORG) of The Duke Heart Center. Effect of intravenous lidocaine on the transcerebral inflammatory response during cardiac surgery: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;63(11):1223-32. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0704-0. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 1, 2009
• Primary Completion (Actual): July 18, 2016
• Study Completion (Actual): May 23, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 10, 2009
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 13, 2009
• First Posted (Estimate): July 14, 2009

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 10, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 8, 2019
• Last Verified: May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Cognition
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders; Neurocognitive Disorders; Cognition Disorders; Cognitive Dysfunction; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Central Nervous System Depressants; Peripheral Nervous System Agents; Sensory System Agents; Anesthetics; Membrane Transport Modulators; Anesthetics, Local; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers; Sodium Channel Blockers; Lidocaine
• Other Study ID Numbers: Pro00015641; R01HL096978 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)