The Benefit of Prophylactic Anticonvulsant in Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome With Induced Mild Hypothermia

July 21, 2011 updated by: Samsung Medical Center

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of sudden death, but the survival rate of cardiac arrest is only 5-35%.

Although, the first resuscitation of cardiac arrest patient would be success, the hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest is an important cause of the mortality and the morbidity.

For the management of the hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest, American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council recommend induced mild hypothermia therapy. And, ILCOR(International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation) announced the standard treatment of post cardiac arrest syndrome(the success state of first resuscitation of the cardiac arrest patient) included the induced mild hypothermia therapy at September, 2008.

The generalized seizure and myoclonus arise in over 60% of post cardiac arrest syndrome patients and they are very difficult to control. Also, the occurrence of them implies poor prognosis of the patient.

Although, mild hypothermia therapy could be decrease the development and propagation of generalized seizure and myoclonus theologically, the therapy could not prevent the development and propagation of them entirely. Therefore, the use of prophylactic anticonvulsant should be needed. But, there is not randomized control study about the use of prophylactic anticonvulsant.

We hypothesized that the use of prophylactic anticonvulsant to post cardiac arrest syndrome patients would decrease the rate of occurrence of generalized seizure and myoclonus and would improve the neurologic outcome.

We planed that we used two anti-epileptic drugs - valproate, clonazepam - for the prophylactic anticonvulsant. The valproate and clonazepam are in general use for prevention and treatment of generalized seizure and myoclonus and are recommended to treat of generalized seizure and myoclonus to post cardiac arrest syndrome patients by 2008 guideline of ILCOR.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age : over 18, under 80
  • Witnessed arrest
  • Successful first resuscitation (ROSC should be last for 20 min.)
  • Coma or Semicoma state
  • Mean arterial pressure > 60mmHg
  • Peripheral Oxygen saturation > 85%
  • Expected life span before cardiac arrest > 3 month.
  • Performance scale before cardiac arrest > 3 month.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cause of arrest

    • Sepsis, Progression of malignancy, Trauma, Hemorrhagic shock
  • Known Coagulopathy
  • Major operation within 7 days
  • Previous seizure history
  • current use of valproate or clonazepam

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
control group
Control group
Experimental: Prophylactic group
the group that used prophylactic anticonvulsants (valproate, clonazepam)
start at hypothermia induction valproate : 30mg/kg iv loading - 8hr after - 6mg/kg q 8hr iv till 72hr clonazepam : 1mg po bit via L-tube till 72 hr

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
electroencephalogram (EEG)
Time Frame: 72hr after cardiac arrest
Seizure activity will be measured by EEG EEG will be interpreted by Nerologist
72hr after cardiac arrest

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CPC score (cerebral performance category) score
Time Frame: 1month and 3 month after cardiac arrest
1month and 3 month after cardiac arrest

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Min Seob Sim, Master, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 1. Willis, C.D., et al., Cardiopulmonary resuscitation after traumatic cardiac arrest is not always futile. Injury, 2006. 37(5): p. 448-54. 2. Eisenberg, M.S., et al., Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities. Ann Emerg Med, 1990. 19(2): p. 179-86. 3. Edgren, E., et al., Assessment of neurological prognosis in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. BRCT I Study Group. Lancet, 1994. 343(8905): p. 1055-9. 4. Nolan, J.P., et al., Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication.Resuscitation, 2008. 79(3): p. 350-79. 5. Neumar, R.W., et al., Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. Circulation, 2008. 118(23): p. 2452-83. 6. Kuboyama, K., et al., Delay in cooling negates the beneficial effect of mild resuscitative cerebral hypothermia after cardiac arrest in dogs: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med, 1993. 21(9): p. 1348-58. 7. Weinrauch, V., et al., Beneficial effect of mild hypothermia and detrimental effect of deep hypothermia after cardiac arrest in dogs. Stroke, 1992. 23(10): p. 1454-62. 8. Sterz, F., et al., Mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs. Crit Care Med, 1991. 19(3): p. 379-89. 9. Leonov, Y., et al., Mild cerebral hypothermia during and after cardiac arrest improves neurologic outcome in dogs. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 1990. 10(1): p. 57-70. 10. Bernard, S.A., et al., Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346(8): p. 557-63.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 25, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2011

Last Verified

July 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on Use of prophylactic anticonvulsants (valproate, clonazepam)

3
Subscribe