Epidemiologic Survey to Describe the Current Medical Practice of General Practitioners Treating Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Latina (DEAL)

June 7, 2017 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Multi-center, Epidemiologic Survey to Describe the Current Medical Practice of General Practitioners Treating Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Latin America

The DEAL (Diabetes En America Latina) study was a multicenter, cross-sectional, epidemiological, questionnaire based study carried out between October 2004 and October 2005 in 9 Latin American countries.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The DEAL (Diabetes En America Latina) study was a multicenter, cross-sectional, epidemiological, questionnaire based study carried out between October 2004 and October 2005 in 9 Latin American countries. General practitioners (GP) from private settings were selected for participation in the study if they were in full time active clinical practice (three or more days per week and treating at least 100 patients per week), had been practicing for at least two years and were seeing at least five type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients per week. Over a period of two weeks after receipt of study questionnaires, GPs were required to review the charts of the first 10 (+/- 2) consecutive diabetic patients to visit the clinic and to provide information about their treatment in accordance with the supplied questionnaire.

Patients were eligible for inclusion in the study if they were males or females aged 18-75 with Type II Diabetes Mellitus - T2DM - (defined by the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (12)), were receiving an oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA) or insulin and had given written informed consent, where required. Measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) performed at the diagnosis and within the previous three months was collected; if the measure was not available for the period, the sponsor supported the laboratory test when necessary, according to the physician's judgment of the patient's need.

Demographic data were collected including information regarding the patient's lifestyle. The most recent fasting blood glucose, lipid level and blood pressure measurements were recorded along with the existence of diabetes related complications such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, macrovascular diseases, eye disorders, kidney disorders, erectile dysfunction and diabetic neuropathy. Antidiabetic medication and/or insulin therapy and therapy for prevention of macrovascular events were also recorded. Information was collected on visits to specialists, challenges to managing the patient's T2DM and on future plans for management. No explanations or clarifications related to the questions were provided and the physicians answered them based on their own understanding. Instructions on how to answer the questionnaire were provided to maximize the validation of the questionnaires.

Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on all variables. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to test the possibility of association between the outcome measures and duration of disease. The independent variables were age, gender, BMI (body-mass index) category, current prescription, drug insurance coverage, glycemic management, lifestyle, number of co-morbidities and compliance to recommendations/therapy. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3592

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Males and females 18-75 years of age, inclusive, with T2DM, as defined by the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (2003), under oral anti-diabetics (OAD) or insulin treatment for diabetes and that have given written informed consent.

The total number of patients planned for this study was up to 6,000 patients: Mexico - 1,500, Argentina - 1,000, Brazil - 1,500, CariCam - 1,100 (Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru, Dominican Republic and Venezuela) and Chile - 500.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females 18-75 years of age, inclusive,
  • Males and females with T2DM, as defined by the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (2003),
  • Males and females under oral anti-diabetics (OAD) or insulin treatment for diabetes and
  • Males and females that have given written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients
males and females between 18 and 75 years of age who been diagnosed with T2DM as defined by the American Diabetes Association
were receiving an oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA) or insulin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The achievement of the planned completed number of questionnaires.
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in glycemic parameters in accordance with the historical information provided by the GPs and her/his judgement of control based on that information.
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Proportion of subjects who respond to any given treatment applied through the level of HbA1c responders (defined as subjects who have achieved HbA1c <7%)
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Assessment of total cholesterol
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Assessment of free fatty acids
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Assessment of high-density lipoprotein
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Assessment low-density lipoprotein
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Assessment of triglycerides
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Assessment of LDL relative flotation
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Assessment of total cholesterol/HDL ratio
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Assessment of LDL/HDL ratio
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year
Assessment of fasting blood glucose
Time Frame: up to 1 year
up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Treatment

3
Subscribe