Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis by Intra-articular Injection of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Treatment of Osteoarthritis by Intra-articular Injection of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Purpose: To determine the safety, feasibility and effectiveness (clinical and radiological) of intra-articular administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Patients and methods

Clinical trial phase I- II, randomized , multicenter , with three treatment arms and 10 patients for each group. The investigators compare the intraarticular injection of hialuronic acid against the administration of two different doses of mesenchymal stem cells with hialuronic acid according to the following scheme:

  1. Group A: intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (Hyalone®). Single dose.
  2. Group B: Low Dosage of MSCs . Intra-articular injection of 10 million autologous mesenchymal progenitor stem cells cultured ex - vivo (cell suspension sterile small volume (5-10 ml ) in a vehicle suitable for intraarticular injection ) followed by an intraarticular injection Hiaurónico Acid ( Hyalone®).
  3. Group C : High dose of MSCs. Intra-articular injection of 100 million autologous mesenchymal progenitor stem cells cultured ex - vivo ( cell suspension sterile small volume (5-10 ml ) in a vehicle suitable for intraarticular injection ) followed by an intraarticular injection Hiaurónico Acid (Hyalone®).

The primary endpoint is safety and feasibility. The investigators registered the occurrence of complications and / or adverse effects during the study.

In addition the investigators assess the response to intra-articular infusion of CMM analyzing the following parameters:

  • Clinical assessment of pain and function (Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months since treatment): VAS , WOMAC , KOOS , EuroQol, SF-16, Lequesne , WOMAC , KOOS.
  • Radiographic (baseline, 6 and 12 months since treatment): Femorotibial space.
  • Radiographic using MRI (baseline, 6 and 12 months since treatment): by assessing the number location of the lesions , cartilage thickness , signal intensity , subchondral bone alteration , volume and WORMS and dGEMRIC protocols.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose: To determine the safety, feasibility and effectiveness (clinical and radiological) of intra-articular administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Patients and methods

Clinical trial phase I- II, randomized , multicenter , with three treatment arms and 10 patients for each group. The investigators compare the intraarticular injection of hialuronic acid against the administration of two different doses of mesenchymal stem cells with hialuronic acid according to the following scheme:

  1. Group A: intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (Hyalone®). Single dose.
  2. Group B: Low Dosage of MSCs . Intra-articular injection of 10 million autologous mesenchymal progenitor stem cells cultured ex - vivo (cell suspension sterile small volume (5-10 ml ) in a vehicle suitable for intraarticular injection ) followed by an intraarticular injection Hiaurónico Acid ( Hyalone®).
  3. Group C : High dose of MSCs. Intra-articular injection of 100 million autologous mesenchymal progenitor stem cells cultured ex - vivo ( cell suspension sterile small volume (5-10 ml ) in a vehicle suitable for intraarticular injection ) followed by an intraarticular injection Hiaurónico Acid (Hyalone®).

The autologous mesenchymal stem cells are obtained from the iliac crest and cultured ex vivo under local anesthesia and sedation.

The primary endpoint is safety and feasibility. The investigators registered the occurrence of complications and / or adverse effects during the study.

In addition the investigators assess the response to intra-articular infusion of CMM analyzing the following parameters:

  • Clinical assessment of pain and function (Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months since treatment): VAS , WOMAC , KOOS , EuroQol, SF-16, Lequesne , WOMAC , KOOS.
  • Radiographic (baseline, 6 and 12 months since treatment): Femorotibial space.
  • Radiographic using MRI (baseline, 6 and 12 months since treatment): by assessing the number location of the lesions , cartilage thickness , signal intensity , subchondral bone alteration , volume and WORMS and dGEMRIC protocols.

All patients met the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females between 50 and 80 year old.
  • Diagnosis of knee OA according to the criteria of osteoarthritis of the ACR (American College of Rheumatology).
  • Joint pain equal or greater than 2.5 points on the visual analogue scale (VAS).
  • Radiological Classification: Kellgren-Lawrence scale greater or equal to 2.
  • Body mass index between 20 and 35 kg/m2.
  • Ability to follow during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral Osteoarthritis of the Knee requiring treatment in both knees.
  • Previous diagnosis of polyarticular disease.
  • Severe mechanical deformation.
  • Arthroscopy during the previous 6 months.
  • Intraarticular infiltration of hyaluronic acid in the last 6 months.
  • Systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease.
  • Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus.
  • Blood dyscrasias.
  • Immunosuppressive or anticoagulant treatments.
  • Treatment with corticosteroids in the 3 months prior to inclusion in the study.
  • NSAID therapy within 15 days prior to inclusion in the study.
  • Patients with a history of allergy to penicillin or streptomycin.
  • Allergy to hyaluronic acid or poultry proteins.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Castilla y León
      • Salamanca, Castilla y León, Spain, 37007
        • Traumatology department. Complejo Hospitalario de Salamanca
    • Navarra
      • Pamplona, Navarra, Spain, 31008
        • Orthopaedic and traumatology department. Clínica Universidad de Navarra

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females between 50 and 80 year old.
  • Diagnosis of knee OA according to the criteria of osteoarthritis of the ACR (American College of Rheumatology).
  • Joint pain equal or greater than 2.5 points on the visual analogue scale (VAS).
  • Radiological Classification: Kellgren-Lawrence scale greater or equal to 2.
  • Body mass index between 20 and 35 kg/m2.
  • Ability to follow during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral Osteoarthritis of the Knee requiring treatment in both knees.
  • Previous diagnosis of polyarticular disease.
  • Severe mechanical deformation.
  • Arthroscopy during the previous 6 months.
  • Intraarticular infiltration of hyaluronic acid in the last 6 months.
  • Systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease.
  • Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus.
  • Blood dyscrasias.
  • Immunosuppressive or anticoagulant treatments.
  • Treatment with corticosteroids in the 3 months prior to inclusion in the study.
  • NSAID therapy within 15 days prior to inclusion in the study.
  • Patients with a history of allergy to penicillin or streptomycin.
  • Allergy to hyaluronic acid or poultry proteins.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hialuronic acid
Single intraarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid (Hyal One)
Single intraarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid (Hyal One)
Other Names:
  • HyalOne
Active Comparator: Hyaluronic acid and MSC 10
Single intraarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid (Hyal One) 10 million Bone marrow mesenchimal stem cells
Single intraarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid (Hyal One)
Other Names:
  • HyalOne
10 million of Bone marrow mesenchimal stem cells
Active Comparator: Hyaluronic acid AND MSC 100
Single intraarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid (Hyal One) 100 million Bone marrow mesenchimal stem cells
Single intraarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid (Hyal One)
Other Names:
  • HyalOne
100 million of Bone marrow mesenchimal stem cells

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: prior to the initial dose on day 1
Baseline Visual analogue scale (VAS)
prior to the initial dose on day 1
Baseline value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos).
Time Frame: Prior to the intervention on day 1
Prior to the intervention on day 1 value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos).
Prior to the intervention on day 1
Baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC).
Time Frame: Prior to the intervention on day 1
Prior to the intervention on day 1 Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC).
Prior to the intervention on day 1
Baseline SF-36 value
Time Frame: Prior to the intervention on day 1
Prior to the intervention on day 1 SF-36 value
Prior to the intervention on day 1
Baseline euroquol 5D value
Time Frame: Prior to the intervention on day 1
Pretreatment euroquol 5D value
Prior to the intervention on day 1
Baseline Lequesne index
Time Frame: Prior to the intervention on day 1
Prior to the intervention on day 1 Lequesne index
Prior to the intervention on day 1
Baseline femorotibial distance
Time Frame: Prior to the intervention
Prior to the intervention femoritibial distance on rosenberg x-ray view
Prior to the intervention
Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Follow up
During the follow up
Follow up
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at on month
Time Frame: 1 month
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at on month
1 month
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 3 months
3 months
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months
6 months
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 12 months
12 months
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 month
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 1 month
1 month
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 3 month
Time Frame: 3 Months
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 3 month
3 Months
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 6 month
Time Frame: 6 months
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 6 month
6 months
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 12 months
12 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 month
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 1 month
1 month
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 3 month
Time Frame: 3 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 1 month
3 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 6 month
Time Frame: 6 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 6 month
6 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 12 months
12 months
SF-36 value at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 month
SF-36 value
1 month
SF 36 value at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
SF 36 value at 3 months
3 months
SF 36 value at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
SF 36 value at 6 months
6 months
SF 36 value at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
SF 36 value at 12 months
12 months
Euroquol 5D value at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 MOnth
Euroquol 5D value at 1 month
1 MOnth
Euroquol 5D value at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
Euroquol 5D value at 3 months
3 months
Euroquol 5D value at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Euroquol 5D value at 6 months
6 months
Euroquol 5D value at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Euroquol 5D value at 12 months
12 months
Lequesne index at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 month
Lequesne index at 1 month
1 month
Lequesne index at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
Lequesne index at 3 months
3 months
Lequesne index at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Lequesne index at 6 months
6 months
Lequesne index at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Lequesne index at 12 months
12 months
Femorotibial distance at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Femorotibial distance at 6 months
6 months
Femorotibial distance at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Femorotibial distance at 12 months
12 months
Baseline MRI WORMS protocol
Time Frame: Prior to the intervention
Prior to the intervention MRI WORMS protocol
Prior to the intervention
MRI WORMS protocol score at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
MRI WORMS protocol score at 6 months
6 months
MRI WORMS protocol score at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
MRI WORMS protocol score at 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: José Lamo-Espinosa, MD, Clinica Universidad de Navarra
  • Study Director: Felipe Prosper, MD PhD, Clinica Universidad de Navarra
  • Principal Investigator: Juan Blanco, MD PhD, University of Salamanca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Hyaluronic acid

3
Subscribe