High and Intermediate Risk Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Treatment: A Trial Comparing MitraClip® to Surgical Therapy (HiRiDe)

September 8, 2016 updated by: University of Zurich

High and Intermediate Risk Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing MitraClip® to Surgical Therapy

The study is comparing MitraClip® to Surgical therapy in high and intermediate risk patients, who should be older than 18 years, and shall evaluate safety and efficacy of MitraClip® vs. surgery in high or intermediate risk patients. The patients will be randomised (MitraClip® or Surgery). The Study Follow-Up includes 4 visits after procedure (hospital discharge, 1, 6, 12 months post-procedure).

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

Two-arm, multi-centre, randomised prospective study comparing MitraClip® to Surgical therapy in high and intermediate risk patients. Patients should be older than 18 years and high and intermediate risk is defined by a score (for MV repair) >= 3% and <= 10% or as determined by the local Heart Team (which should include a surgeon and a cardiologist), based on the evidence that STS risk calculator may not identify all possible risk factors. Patients are selected upon clinical conditions and severity of MR. Anatomical feasibility is assessed by ECHO, according to the IFU (information for use).

The purpose of the trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of MitraClip® vs. surgery in high and intermediate risk patients with DMR. Study Follow-Up includes the following visits after procedure: Hospital discharge, 1, 6, 12 months post-procedure.

Primary Endpoints are the 30-day safety superiority (ITT analysis) and the 12-month efficacy non-inferiority (ITT analysis) of the MitraClip®. The overall rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Serious Adverse Device Events (SADEs) until 12 months and the MR Severity reduction at 6 and 12 month in the MitraClip® and Surgery groups are Secondary Endpoints

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

294

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bonn, Germany, 53127
        • Universitatsklinikum Bonn
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg GmbH
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20099
        • Asklepios Klinik Hamburg St. Georg
      • Köln, Germany, 50937
        • Universitätsklinikum Köln, Herzzentrum
      • München, Germany, 81377
        • Klinikum der Universität München Großhadern
      • Siegburg, Germany, 53721
        • Helios Klinikum Siegburg
      • Catania, Italy, 95124
        • Presidio Ospedaliero Ferrarotto Alessi
      • Milano, Italy, 20132
        • San Raffaele Hospital
      • Roma, Italy, 00133
        • Policlinico Tor Vergata
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Inselspital Bern
      • Lugano, Switzerland, 6900
        • Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Universitätsspital Zürich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gender: Both, male and female
  • Minimum Age: 18 Years
  • Maximum Age: no maximum age
  • Severe (4+) DMR (degenerative mitral regurgitation), or 3+ DMR
  • NYHA Functional Class III or IV
  • Mitral valve anatomy should be suitable for both MitraClip® and Mitral valve surgery (repair or replacement)
  • Subjects meet the following conditions:

Age >18 and high or intermediate risk patients with an STS calculated mortality (using the repair calculator) >=3% and <=10% or as determined by the local Heart Team (which should include a surgeon and a cardiologist), based on the evidence that STS risk calculator may not identify all possible risk factors

  • patient is operable
  • Signed by the subject and dated approved informed consent prior to any study related procedure
  • Available and able to return to study site for post-procedural follow-up examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient incapable to approve the informed consent or Emergency Cases
  • functional mitral valve pathology
  • evolving endocarditis or active endocarditis in the last 3 months
  • heavily calcified leaflets
  • subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography is contraindicated
  • subjects in whom transseptal catheterisation is contraindicated
  • presence of any known life threatening (non-cardiac major or progressive disease), non-cardiac disease that will limit the subject's life expectancy to less than one year
  • currently participating in the study of an investigational drug or device
  • untreated clinically significant CAD requiring revascularisation
  • any percutaneous coronary, carotid, endovascular intervention or carotid surgery within 30 days or any coronary or endovascular surgery within 3 months
  • prior mitral valve leaflet surgery or any currently implanted prosthetic mitral valve, or any prior transcatheter mitral valve procedure
  • concomitant and significant aortic or tricuspid valve pathology
  • CVA or TIA within 6 months or severe carotid stenosis (>70% assessed by Ultrasound)
  • contraindication or known allergy to device's components, aspirin, anti-coagulation therapy or contrast media that cannot be adequately managed with premedication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: MitraClip® Therapy
MitraClip® system is a CE marked medical device, which consists of two parts (Clip Delivery System and Steerable Guide Catheter). It is a single sized, percutaneously implanted mechanical Clip. The MitraClip® device grasps and coapts the mitral valve leaflets resulting in fixed approximation of the mitral leaflets throughout the cardiac cycle. The procedure is performed in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory with echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance while the patient is under general anaesthesia.
one or more (if needed) MitraClip® devices are placed on the leaflets of the mitral valve during catheterisation in a catheter laboratory
Active Comparator: Surgery
Surgical therapy of degenerative mitral regurgitation: repair or replacement of mitral valve, clinical standard
Repair or replace mitral valve

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-day safety superiority (ITT analysis): Major Adverse Event Composite
Time Frame: 30 days
The study is powered to show superiority for safety of an endovascular treatment strategy with the MitraClip® as compared to a surgical treatment strategy. The primary safety endpoint is a Major Adverse Event Composite (MAE) including all-cause death, prolonged ventilation (>48h), renal failure, stroke and need for non-elective cardiovascular or thoracic surgery (defined as any kind of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery performed within 30 days from the index procedure and non anticipated prior to the procedure). The analysis of the primary safety endpoint is a test of superiority for the proportion of subjects free from the composite of safety events in the Device vs. the Surgery group at 30 days.
30 days
12-month efficacy non-inferiority (ITT analysis): Proportion of responders in the Device vs. the Surgery group
Time Frame: 12 month
The study is powered to show non-inferiority for clinical efficacy of an endovascular treatment strategy with the MitraClip® as compared to a surgical treatment strategy. The primary effectiveness endpoint is a test of non-inferiority for the proportion of responders in the Device vs. the Surgery group at 12 months. Patients are defined as responders if they are alive with at least a 1-grade improvement in NYHA Functional Class at 12 months over baseline and have not experienced a HF hospitalization within 12 months of randomization (MitraClip® procedure or Surgery).
12 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs) within 12 month
Time Frame: 12 month
Evaluation of all SAEs and SADEs that occur during the trial
12 month
MR Severity reduction at 6 and 12 month
Time Frame: between 6 and 12 month
MR (Mitral Regurgitation) Severity reduction at 6 and 12 months in the MitraClip® and Surgery groups
between 6 and 12 month
NYHA class changes at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: between 6 and 12 month
NYHA class changes at 6 and 12 months in the MitraClip® and Surgery groups
between 6 and 12 month
Change in 6MWT in 6 and 12 month
Time Frame: between 6 and 12 months
Change in 6MWT (6 Minute Walking Test) in 6 and 12 months in the MitraClip® and Surgery groups
between 6 and 12 months
Change in Quality of Life in 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: between 1 and 12 months
Change in Quality of Life (MLWHF) at 1,6 and 12 month in the MitraClip® and Surgery groups
between 1 and 12 months
Heart failure hospitalisation rate
Time Frame: during 12 months post procedure
Heart failure hospitalisation rate in the post randomisation in the MitraClip® and Surgery groups
during 12 months post procedure
Days alive and out of hospital
Time Frame: during 12 months post procedure
Days alive and out of hospital in the 12 months post-randomisation in the MitraClip® and Surgery groups
during 12 months post procedure
Hospital resources utilisations
Time Frame: during 12 months post procedure
Hospital resources utillizations: length of stay post-procedure, ICU beds occupancy, need for rehabilitation services
during 12 months post procedure
Change in Quality of Life (SF36) in 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: between 1 and 12 months
Change in SF36 at 1,6 and 12 month in the MitraClip® and Surgery groups
between 1 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francesco Maisano, Prof., UniversitätSpital Zürich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on MitraClip®

3
Subscribe