Ultrasound-guided Continuous Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Replacement: Comparison of Short-axis and Long-axis Techniques

April 15, 2019 updated by: Cui Xulei
This study compares the long-axis and short-axis technique of continues adductor canal block for total knee replacement surgery. Half participants will receive long-axis catheterization, while the other half will receive short-axis catheterization.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Xulei CUI

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-80 years
  • Knee-arthroscopy
  • Written consent
  • ASA I-III
  • BMI 19-35

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to communicate with the investigators (e.g., a language barrier or a neuropsychiatric disorder).
  • coagulopathy or on anticoagulant medication
  • Allergic reactions toward drugs used in the trial
  • History of substance abuse
  • Infection at injection site
  • Can not be mobilised to 5 meters of walk pre-surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: short axis (SAX) placement of adductor canal catheters
Procedure: Ultrasound guided short axis (SAX) placement of adductor canal catheters Philip CX50 ultrasound scanner guided insertion of a PAJUNK Contiplex S catheter along the short axis of the middle part of adductor canal
The long axis of the ultrasound probe is placed vertical to the long axis of the adductor canal while scanning, and the catheter is placed along the short axis of the canal using an in-plane approach
The linear (C5-12) probe of Philip CX 50 Ultrasound Scanner is used for scanning
0.2% ropivacaine 10ml is given as loading dose. Following that, 0.2% ropivacaine 5ml/h is given as maintenance dose.
bolus: 2mg, lock time: 10min, 1h limitation: 8mg
Experimental: long axis (LAX) placement of adductor canal catheters
Procedure: Ultrasound guided long axis (LAX) placement of adductor canal catheters Philip CX50 ultrasound scanner guided insertion of a catheter along the long axis of the middle part of adductor canal
The linear (C5-12) probe of Philip CX 50 Ultrasound Scanner is used for scanning
0.2% ropivacaine 10ml is given as loading dose. Following that, 0.2% ropivacaine 5ml/h is given as maintenance dose.
bolus: 2mg, lock time: 10min, 1h limitation: 8mg
The long axis of the ultrasound probe is placed parallel to the long axis of the adductor canal while scanning, and the catheter is placed along the long axis of the canal using an in-plane approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the strength of quadriceps femoris
Time Frame: within 48hours after surgery
strength of quadriceps femoris measured on a Lovett muscle strength rating-scale within 48 hours after surgery
within 48hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative nausea and vomiting score
Time Frame: 0-2, 2-4, 4-8, 8-24, 24-48 hours postoperative
Rating-scale 0-3 SAX-group vs. LAX-group
0-2, 2-4, 4-8, 8-24, 24-48 hours postoperative
ambulation time
Time Frame: within the 7 days after surgery
SAX-group vs. LAX-group
within the 7 days after surgery
quality of recovery
Time Frame: 3days and 7days after surgery
use the self-assessment 11item QoR scale to assess the patient's recovery quality,SAX-group vs. LAX-group
3days and 7days after surgery
complications
Time Frame: within the 7 days after surgery
Record complications including catheter dislodgment, puncture point infection, leakage,falling down,et al.
within the 7 days after surgery
the strength of quadriceps femoris
Time Frame: 0,2,4,8,24,48 hours postoperative
SAX-group vs. LAX-group
0,2,4,8,24,48 hours postoperative
Pain-score (VAS), patient at rest
Time Frame: 0,2,4,8,24,48 hours postoperative
Pain-score measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) .SAX-group vs. LAX-group
0,2,4,8,24,48 hours postoperative
Pain-score (VAS), motion pain
Time Frame: 0,2,4,8,24,48 hours postoperative
Pain-score measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) .SAX-group vs. LAX-group
0,2,4,8,24,48 hours postoperative
sulfentanil consumption
Time Frame: 0,2,4,8,24,48 hours postoperative
record the amount(ml) of sulfentanil used
0,2,4,8,24,48 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yuguang Huang, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 3, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on ultrasound guided short axis placement of adductor canal catheter

3
Subscribe