Clinical Trial of Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy During PAO

August 26, 2023 updated by: Rafael J. Sierra, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial of Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy During Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Management of Hip Dysplasia

The study will assess the outcomes of patients treated with concomitant hip arthroscopy at the time of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for patients with hip dysplasia compared with patients treated with PAO alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are currently no absolute indications for intraarticular assessment at the time of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Based on investigators' review of the literature and experience, patients who may benefit from intraarticular assessment are those with radiographic or MRI evidence of damage where an intraarticular inspection may help in determining whether a PAO is a reasonable procedure, those with mechanical symptoms likely related to labral pathology, round ligament or cartilage problems and those with hip dysplasia and cam deformities with limited range of motion that may benefit from femoral head neck junction osteochondroplasty. However, despite these relative indications today there is no clear evidence to suggest that these patients will do better than those that do not have intraarticular work done. Hence, the objective of this project is to determine whether intraarticular work at the time of PAO surgery leads to improved pain and function when compared to patients that do not undergo intraarticular work at the time of PAO.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

106

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rafael Sierra, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of hip dysplasia (DDH) electing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for treatment
  • Skeletally mature
  • Age 15 - 55
  • Tonnis Grade 0 or 1 osteoarthritis (minimal or no arthritis)
  • Ability to receive a standard of care preoperative (magnetic resonance imaging) MRI arthrogram of the hip

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Previous surgery about the hip
  • Patients receiving PAO for acetabular retroversion in the absence of DDH
  • Previous hip arthroscopy to address intra-articular pathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Periacetabular osteotomy
Standard periacetabular osteotomy on the day of surgery.
The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy has become the osteotomy of choice in North America for correction of the dysplastic hip. The ability to position the acetabular component in a specifically desired position for each individual patient improves joint biomechanics, restores joint balance and stability, and offloads the structures at risk for damage such as the labrum and the adjacent articular cartilage.
Active Comparator: Periacetabular osteotomy with hip arthroscopy
Hip arthroscopy on the day of surgery, followed by a standard periacetabular osteotomy.
An intraarticular assessment with hip arthroscopy (HA) at the time of periacetabular osteotomy allows the surgeon to assess and treat the associated labral and chondral pathology and allows the surgeon to treat abnormalities of the femoral head junction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean score of Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome (Hoos)
Time Frame: 1 year follow-up time point
Score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores representing better function.
1 year follow-up time point
Mean score of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 1 year follow-up time point
The scores range from 0-4 in 24 different categories that are broken up into three subcategories: pain, stiffness and physical function.
1 year follow-up time point
Mean score of University California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity assessment
Time Frame: 1 year follow-up time point
Measured on a 1-10 scale: 1) wholly inactive, dependent on others; 2) mostly inactive, restricted to minimal activities of daily living; 3) sometimes participate in mild activities such as walking, limited housework, or shopping; 4) regularly participate in mild activities; 5) sometimes participate in moderate activities such as swimming and unlimited housework or shopping; 6) regularly participate in moderate activities; 7) regularly participate in active events such as bicycling; 8) regularly participate in very active events such as bowling or golf; 9) sometimes participate in impact sports such as jogging, tennis, or skiing, or heavy labor; and 10) regularly participate in impact sports.
1 year follow-up time point
Mean score of the Marx Activity Scale (MARX)
Time Frame: 1 year follow-up time point
Score is measured from 0-4.
1 year follow-up time point

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rafael Sierra, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only study personnel authorized by the investigator will collect data/enroll subjects. Data will be stored in electronic files and/or a cabinet, with access to study personnel as authorized by the investigator. The investigator will review the data on a regular basis (at least annually) to verify the validity of the data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Dysplasia

Clinical Trials on Periacetabular osteotomy

3
Subscribe