Quantification of Dynamic and Static Cerebral Autoregulation (CA) Under Anaesthesia (SAMBA)

May 25, 2021 updated by: Niek Sperna Weiland, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Simultaneous Quantification of Dynamic and Static Cerebral Autoregulation (CA) at Different Steady-state Mean Blood Pressures Under Anaesthesia.

Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is the mechanism by which the brain vasculature maintains constancy of cerebral blood flow (CBF). Reliable direct measurements of CBF at different blood pressure levels are difficult because they are invasive and time-consuming. This type of measurement to quantify CA is generally referred to as static cerebral autoregulation (sCA). Alternatively, it is possible to measure CA indirectly from blood pressure oscillations. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) measures how quickly the cerebral vessels react to a change in blood pressure to normalize CBF. Since the introduction of transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), it has become possible to estimate CBF velocity relatively easy, which in turn correlates well with CBF changes. This method is widely used to quantify dCA. However, it is not clear how sCA correlates with dCA over a range of physiologic mean blood pressure (MBP). It is important to compare different methods of assessing CA, because impaired CA may result in increased risk of perioperative complications such as stroke. In this study, the investigators were interested in establishing the relationship between sCA and dCA during surgery under general anesthesia. The investigators aim to compare these methods during propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC, location AMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA-I or ASA-II, willing and able to give written informed consent, scheduled for elective, non-cardiothoracic surgery under general anaesthesia and age 18 years and above.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient related

    • Unable/ unwilling to participate
    • ASA-III or higher
    • Age < 18 years
    • History of: uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, Parkinson's disease, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, Pure autonomic failure (formerly called idiopathic orthostatic hypotension), Multiple system atrophy with autonomic failure (formerly called Shy-Drager syndrome), Addison's disease and hypopituitarism, pheochromocytoma, peripheral autonomic neuropathy (e.g., amyloid neuropathy, idiopathic autonomic neuropathy), known cardiomyopathy, extreme left ventricle hypertrophy or ejection fraction < 30%, proven or suspected allergy for any of the medication used during induction of anaesthesia, malignant hyperthermia.
    • Unability to record transcranial Doppler ultrasound due to anatomical variance (~5% of population)
    • Contra-indications for intravenous or inhalational anaesthesia.
    • Contra-indications for phenylephrine: severe hypertension, peripheral vascular illness, severe hyperthyroidism
    • Simultaneous use of MAO-inhibitors, dopaminergic or vasoconstrictor ergot alkaloids (bromocriptine, cabergoline, pergolide, ergotamine, methylergometrine, methysergide), linezolid, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, digoxin, quinidine, oxytocin.
  • Surgery related

    • Day case surgery
    • Laparoscopy with CO2 insufflation
    • Extreme positioning during surgery (head-down/up tilt, lateral decubitus position, prone)
    • Surgery < 60 minutes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Propofol
ASA-I/II patients undergoing elective, non-cardiothoracic surgery with intravenous anaesthesia (propofol).
Propofol
Correction of anesthesia induced hypotension with phenylephrine to obtain sCA and dCA measurements at 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 mmHg mean blood pressure. This is achieved by stepwise increases in phenylephrine infusion dose.
Patientes are mechanically ventilated at 6 bpm to obtain low frequency blood pressure oscillations (~0.1 Hz).
Active Comparator: Sevoflurane
ASA-I/II patients undergoing elective, non-cardiothoracic surgery with inhalational anaesthesia (sevoflurane).
Sevoflurane
Correction of anesthesia induced hypotension with phenylephrine to obtain sCA and dCA measurements at 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 mmHg mean blood pressure. This is achieved by stepwise increases in phenylephrine infusion dose.
Patientes are mechanically ventilated at 6 bpm to obtain low frequency blood pressure oscillations (~0.1 Hz).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in dCA after several MBP-increasing steps.
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
Intraoperatively
Differences in dCA between sevoflurane and propofol at different steady-state MBP's.
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
Intraoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeroen Hermanides, Dr., Amsterdam UMC, location AMC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebrovascular Circulation

Clinical Trials on Sevoflurane

3
Subscribe