Excessive Crying in Children With Cerebral Palsy and Communication Deficits (ECCCPCD)

October 23, 2021 updated by: Dr.Nagabhushana Rao Potharaju, Sathbhavana Brain Clinic

Excessive Crying in Children With Cerebral Palsy and Communication Deficits -a Fixed-sequence, Crossover Clinical Trial

Management of excessive crying in children with cerebral palsy and communication deficits [ECCCPCD] was guided by the associated clinical findings and investigations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pain treatments are frequently hit or miss, trial & error, or because of the fear of litigations, not offered at all, particularly in cerebral palsy. Pain is an under-suspected and under-diagnosed cause of ECCCPCD. It was hypothesized that pain/discomfort was responsible for ECCCPCD, and a vicious cycle of pain-spasm-pain aggravated the pain/discomfort. So, the response of ECCCPCD to treatment guided by clinical findings & investigations was studied.

There was an initial placebo run-in period. This study was a prospective, single-center, interventional, with initial placebo-control, double-blind for initial 110 days, open-label for the next 290 days, fixed-sequence, two treatment, two-period, crossover clinical trial. The placebo run-in period (15 days) was followed by the placebo period (15 days). After a washout period (10 days), drug treatment (360 days) was started depending on the clinical findings and investigations. The drugs used either singly or in various combinations were GABA-B agonists, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, benzodiazepines, inhibitors of the vesicular monoamine transporter, antiepileptics, and tricyclic antidepressants. The outcome measure was total, and unexplained mean cry durations in hours per day. The cry duration was measured for one 10-day period while on placebo [days P6-P15], and four 10-day periods while on treatment [T61-70, T241-250, T311-320, and T351-360]. Total and unexplained mean cry durations in hours per day were calculated from 10-day measurements of cry durations. From the 251st day of therapy, the dose was reduced by 5% every week until [ECCCPCD] started to increase. This reduction of the dose was made to confirm the efficacy of drugs and to check if the dosage requirement has reduced after 250 days of treatment. This dose was maintained until the next measurement between T311 and T320. Then the dosages were adjusted as necessary. The caregivers were allowed to volunteer any additional observations of interest. Drug adverse effects were recorded.

Epidemiological data, GMFCS levels, and MAS scores were noted at the time of enrollment. Summary statistics were tabulated and plotted. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon tests were done to study the statistical significance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

131

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  1. A child with cerebral palsy under the age of 15 years and could not communicate the reason for excessive crying because of young age or global developmental delay/profound intellectual retardation.
  2. Excessive crying of >7.5 hours daily for 30 consecutive days unresponsive to treatment by the pediatrician, orthopedic surgeon, gastroenterologist, and physiotherapist.
  3. Minimum cry intensity for recording: If the intensity of crying was so high that the caregiver could not hear radio, TV, or another person talking to her [sitting near her], the cry duration was recorded.
  4. History, clinical, and neuroimaging findings (structural MRI) were suggestive of chronic static encephalopathy.
  5. Motor impairment could be explained by an insult that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medicines used in the study were used in the previous 30 days, and it was impossible to taper off the drugs without worsening of symptoms.
  2. Excessive crying due to known causes.
  3. Progressive encephalopathies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-Sequence 1
The placebo contained fructose powder in packets identical to the medicines.
Fructose powder identical with the drugs was used
Other Names:
  • Fruit sugar, levulose.
Active Comparator: Drug-Sequence 2
GABA-B agonists, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, inhibitors of the vesicular monoamine transporter, benzodiazepines, antiepileptics, and tricyclic antidepressants were used.
Drugs were used either singly or in combination guided by clinical findings and investigations.
Other Names:
  • Baclofen(Liofen®),Diazepam,(Valium®),Clonazepam,(Klonopin®),Trihexyphenidyl(Artane®),Tetrabenazine(Xenazine®),Gabapentin(Neurontin®),Topiramate(Topamax®),Lamotrigine(Lamictal®),Amitriptyline(Elavil®)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epidemiologic data (Age and sex).
Time Frame: 400 days.
Epidemiologic data (age rounded up in years, sex-number of males, females, and transgender, if any).
400 days.
The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels
Time Frame: 400 days
The gross motor function of children with cerebral palsy was categorized into 5 different levels using the Gross Motor Function Classification System tool. A higher score means a worse condition.
400 days
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores
Time Frame: 400 days
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores from 0 to 4 were used. A higher score means a worse condition.
400 days
Measurement of both Total and Unexplained cry durations
Time Frame: 400 days

Caregivers measured both Total and Unexplained cry durations with a digital watch or a mobile phone in hours: minutes: seconds over five ten-day periods. MM1 while on placebo days 6-15 [P6-P15], and four measurements MM2 to MM5 while on treatment days 61-70 [T61-70], 241-250 [T241-250], 311-320 [T311-320], and 351-360 [T351-360].

Statistician calculated means of cry duration in hours per day.

400 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Any other changes in the clinical profile observed during the study period and reported by the caregivers.
Time Frame: 400 days
Any other changes in the clinical profile (frequency changes) observed during the study period were reported by the caregivers. The number and percentages of children with the change were calculated.
400 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nagabhushana Rao Potharaju, BScMDDCHDM, Sathbhavana Brain Clinic, Hyderabad, India

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

They must acknowledge the sharing.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

One year

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

For meta-analysis or a similar study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe