Translating Metabolic Responses to Mechanical Insult Into Early Interventions to Prevent PTOA

June 8, 2026 updated by: J L Marsh
This is a small-scale proof-of concept clinical trial of amobarbital as a treatment to prevent post-traumatic osteoarthritis in fractured ankle joints. The study is a double blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, stepwise trial. Amobarbital will be delivered to ankle joints in solution with hyaluronic acid (HA) as a vehicle. Amobarbital/HA injections (active dose) will be compared to HA alone (placebo dose). Our primary goal is to confirm safety, but we will also assess whether treatment improves chondrocyte viability and decreases synovial inflammation. The intervention that will be utilized has proven to be effective using vitro and in vivo models. The study team will assess safety and begin to evaluate efficacy of amobarbital/Gel-One in patients having sustained tibial pilon fractures. The study team will use advanced imaging-based methods we have developed to characterize how joints subjected to varying levels of fracture severity and residual elevated contact stress respond in treated and control groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a small-scale proof-of concept clinical trial of amobarbital as a treatment to prevent post-traumatic osteoarthritis in fractured ankle joints. The study is a double blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, stepwise trial. Amobarbital will be delivered to ankle joints in solution with hyaluronic acid (HA) as a vehicle. Amobarbital/HA injections (active dose) will be compared to HA alone (placebo dose). Our primary goal is to confirm safety, but we will also assess whether treatment improves chondrocyte viability and decreases synovial inflammation. The intervention that will be utilized has proven to be effective using vitro and in vivo models. The study team will assess safety and begin to evaluate efficacy of amobarbital/Gel-One in patients having sustained tibial pilon fractures. The study team will use advanced imaging-based methods we have developed to characterize how joints subjected to varying levels of fracture severity and residual elevated contact stress respond in treated and control groups.

Phase I:6 subjects will be treated with a single dose open label, and safety measures will be assessed.

Phase II: Once initial safety is confirmed, 20 amobarbital:10 control subjects will be treated with the single dose at the initial operation.

Assuming continued safety, an additional 20 amobarbital:10 control subjects will be treated with two doses and evaluated. The second dose of 2.5 mM amobarbital will be administered during the second operation.

Subjects will participate in the following procedures:

SOC surgical intervention Randomization to Amobarbital/Gel-One arm or control arm X-rays CT scans Blood and urine Questionnaires

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52240
        • University of Iowa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-60 years
  • Acute closed or type 1 open ankle fractures (classified as OTA/AO 43 B 1-3 and 43 C 1- 3 or classified as 42 B and C fractures with 25% talar displacement and one of the following; syndesmosis injury or medial malleolar fracture at or above the shoulder) (Marsh et al., 2007)) without operative ipsilateral extremity trauma
  • Posterior malleolar and supination adduction rotational fractures that have an articular fracture line across the articular surface of the distal tibia. Posterior malleolar fractures should affect 25% of the articular surface or greater.
  • Fractures must have initial treatment within 72 hours of injury including initial injection of amobarbital or placebo.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes
  • Pregnant or nursing mothers and individuals with child-bearing potential that are not using birth control methods with >99% efficacy.
  • Allergy to poultry products or cinnamon
  • Previous injuries to the ankle
  • High grade open wounds
  • Pre-existing immunologic or hematologic diseases
  • Pre-existing ankle arthritis
  • Ipsilateral fractures
  • Associated injuries that preclude standard rehabilitation
  • Pre-existing dysfunction of the kidneys, liver, blood, immune system, endocrine system (excluding diabetes)
  • Serum creatinine >/= 1.4 mg/dl; BUN > 30 mg/dl; ALT >/= 60 IU/L in males and >/= 50 IU/L in females; AST >/= 45 IU/L in males and > 40 IU/L in females; bilirubin > 1.3 mg/dL; platelets </= 50,000/ul; glucose > 200 mg/dL

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phase I single amobarbital/Gel-One dose
Phase I: An open label study of 3 patients will be done. If no dose limiting toxic (DLT) side effects occur, then an additional 3 patients will be done. If no DLT events occur, the study will proceed to Phase II.
One dose of amobarbital/Gel-One during the initial surgical intervention
Active Comparator: Phase IIa Part 1 amobarbital/Gel-One dose
20 subjects will be randomized to amobarbital/Gel-One single dose.
One dose of amobarbital/Gel-One during the initial surgical intervention
Placebo Comparator: Phase IIa Part 1 Placebo
10 subjects will be randomized to amobarbital/Gel-One single dose.
One dose of placebo during the initial surgical intervention
Active Comparator: Phase IIa Part 2 amobarbital/Gel-One dose
20 subjects will be randomized to one dose of amobarbital/Gel-One during the initial surgical intervention. A second dose will be administered during the second surgical intervention.
One dose of amobarbital/Gel-One during the initial surgical intervention. A second dose will be administered during the second surgical intervention.
Placebo Comparator: Phase IIa Part 2 placebo
20 subjects will be randomized to one dose of placebo during the initial surgical intervention. A second dose will be administered during the second surgical intervention.
One dose of placebo during the initial surgical intervention. A second dose will be administered during the second surgical intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Systemic Adverse Events Defined as Abnormal Laboratory Values and Number Where Amobarbital is Detected Systemically
Time Frame: Pre-op baseline on the day before external fixation surgery (within 24 hours of injury), immediately post-op, and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op. At the time of internal fixation (3-21 days after external fixation) and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op.]

Safety Measures: CBC and standard clinical chemistry assays to quantify circulating, ALT, AST, Bilirubin, Creatinine, and BUN and the measurement of urine protein content will be evaluated and the number of participants with clinically significant abnormal laboratory values will be determined.

Presence of amobarbital will be tested in blood and urine samples and the number of subjects it is detected in will be reported.

Pre-op baseline on the day before external fixation surgery (within 24 hours of injury), immediately post-op, and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op. At the time of internal fixation (3-21 days after external fixation) and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op.]
Determine the Number of Participants With a Change of Local Toxicity in Tissues. (Outcome Discontinued)
Time Frame: Pre-op baseline on the day before external fixation surgery (within 24 hours of injury), immediately post-op, and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op. At the time of internal fixation (3-21 days after external fixation) and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op.

Local toxicity will be determined by examining the osteochondral fragments obtained during the internal fixation surgery for cartilage and synovial histological changes.

This outcome was discontinued. Samples were not taken and this measurement was not completed.

Pre-op baseline on the day before external fixation surgery (within 24 hours of injury), immediately post-op, and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op. At the time of internal fixation (3-21 days after external fixation) and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) - Pain Interference
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Pain Interference scale. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference (worse score). Result is reported as a T-score, with the population norm at 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up visit
Physical Function - T-score - mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. Higher is better.
3, 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up visit
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Global Health Questionnaires - Mental Health and Physical Health Scores
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up
Global Health - T-score - mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. Higher is better.
6, 12 and 24 month follow-up
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Score.
Time Frame: 6,12 and 24 month follow-up
0-100 point scale with 100 perfect ankle function
6,12 and 24 month follow-up
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI). ADL and Sports Scores
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up
Description: Results are reported on a percentage scale with 100% perfect (higher is better)
6, 12 and 24 month follow-up
CT-based Fracture Energy
Time Frame: calculated at 6 month follow-up
Fracture energy is measured in Joules. It is from CT data and measured computationally. It is a continuous measure - Higher Joules = more energy = worse fracture
calculated at 6 month follow-up
CT-based Contact Stress
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up

Vertical CT scan of ankle are segmented and analyzed using finite element analysis. Results are expressed as Contract Stress Exposure (MPa) across areas.

Scans were completed in 4 participants at baseline, 4 participants at 6 month visit, 1 participant at month 12 and 1 participant at month 24.

Contact stress measurements were not completed on any scans and are not avaialble.

6, 12 and 24 month follow-up
CT-based Joint Space Width
Time Frame: Month 0, 6, 12
Vertical CT scan of ankle used to measure Joint Space Width at several locations to measure distance to calculate the mean tibiotalar joint space (mm).
Month 0, 6, 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified radiographic and clinical data will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on amobarbital/Gel-One (one dose)

Subscribe