Enhanced Recovery After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

December 21, 2022 updated by: University Hospital of North Norway

Spinal Analgesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation Using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program: a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial

Investigators would like to test the effects of spinal anesthesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. Investigators hypothesize that spinal anesthesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia will reduce postoperative pain and opioid requirements.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Effective pain management after laparoscopic rectal surgery is a fundamental requirement in an enhanced recovery after surgery program (ERAS). Opioids remain the mainstay for postsurgical pain despite well documented side effects including sedation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, constipation, physical dependence, tolerance, and respiratory depression. Spinal analgesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia has not been studied in laparoscopic rectal surgery, but data from studies of patients undergoing colon cancer resection indicate a positive analgesic effect of spinal anesthesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia. When an ERAS program was used for laparoscopic colonic resection, It has been showed that an intrathecal mixture of bupivacaine and morphine was associated with less postoperative opioid consumption. In a more recent paper intrathecal morphine was a more effective method for treating postoperative pain in laparoscopic colon surgery than intravenous opioids within an ERAS program. In the present proposal the investigators would like to test the effects of spinal anesthesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. It was hypothesized that spinal anesthesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia would reduce postoperative pain and opioid requirements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Troms
      • Tromsø, Troms, Norway, 9038
        • University Hospital of North Norway

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 98 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

*All patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation for rectal cancer * Age 18-100 years are eligible for enrollment in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • ASA IV,
  • BMI>35,
  • contraindication to spinal analgesia
  • allergy to any of the drugs used in this study protocol,
  • chronic use of opioids or steroids,
  • liver or renal impairment,
  • patients scheduled for synchronous laparoscopic liver metastatic surgery
  • inability to communicate in Norwegian.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Spinal
Spinal anesthesia
One group will receive bupivacaine 15 mg and morphine 100 ug intrathecally
Other Names:
  • Marcain
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo spinal
One group will receive bupivacaine 15 mg and morphine 100 ug intrathecally
Other Names:
  • Marcain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nummeric rating scale (0-10), where 10 indicate worst possible pain.
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Worst pain scores in the first 48 hrs.
48 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lars M Ytrebø, PhD, University Hospital of North Norway

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 7, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 7, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine Injection

3
Subscribe