Optimizing Psychological Treatment for Pain After Breast Cancer

November 1, 2022 updated by: Bobby Zachariae, University of Aarhus

Optimizing Psychological Treatment for Pain After Breast Cancer: A Factorial Design Study

The present study aims to optimize psychological treatment for pain after breast cancer by identifying active treatment components. Specifically, a factorial design will be used to evaluate the efficacy and change processes of three psychological treatment components, which have been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of pain after breast cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is a need for optimization of psychological treatment of pain after breast cancer. Optimization relies on knowledge about the active components of existing treatments. Guided by the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), the present study aims to address this challenge by identifying active contemporary cognitive behavioral therapy components for breast cancer-related pain. Consistent with the Optimization phase of the MOST framework, a full factorial design will be used to evaluate the efficacy and change processes of three selected treatment components.The overall hypothesis is that the three components will target key maintaining psychological factors in pain, thus leading to reductions in the primary outcomes of pain intensity and -interference. The treatment components and their hypothesized mechanisms of action are as follows:

  1. Mindful attention practices will increase attentional control (i.e., the ability to intentionally focus and intentionally shift one's attention), thereby reducing pain hypervigilance, leading to reductions in pain intensity and -interference.
  2. Decentering practices will reduce fusion with thoughts (i.e., getting caught up in one's thoughts, feelings and inner experiences), thereby reducing pain catastrophizing, leading to reductions in pain intensity and -interference.
  3. Values and committed action (i.e., behavior congruent with one's values) will increase acceptance of discomfort and reduce avoidant behavior, leading to reductions in pain intensity and -interference.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

185

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Robert Zachariae, DMSc
  • Phone Number: +4587165878
  • Email: bzach@rm.dk

Study Locations

    • Central Denmark Region
      • Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark, 8000
        • Recruiting
        • Aarhus University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of primary breast cancer stage I-III
  • Min. 6 months post primary treatment (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy). Endocrine treatment, e.g., Letrozol or Tamoxifen, and/or Zoledronic acid and/or Herceptin treatment is allowed during study participation
  • Pain corresponding to a pain score of >= 3 on pain intensity and/or pain interference measured by 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRSs)
  • Sufficient ability to communicate in Danish
  • Sufficient ability to participate in an online-delivered intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-curable breast cancer (stage IV)
  • Breast cancer recurrence
  • Bilateral breast cancer
  • Other current cancer disease
  • Other primary pain condition (e.g., fibromyalgia)
  • Current severe psychiatric disorder (e.g., psychosis) hindering study participation
  • Insufficient ability to communicate in Danish
  • Insufficient ability to participate in an online-delivered intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Waitlist control
Participants randomized to condition 1 are not offered any treatment components immediately upon enrollment, but will be offered a treatment component of own choice at the end of the study. Total number of sessions: 2 (2 contact hours) following study completion.
Experimental: Mindful attention
Participants randomized to condition 2 will receive the Mindful attention treatment component. Total number of sessions: 2 (2 contact hours).
The Mindful attention treatment component consists of a breathing exercise and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
Experimental: Decentering
Participants randomized to condition 3 will receive the Decentering treatment component. Total number of sessions: 2 (2 contact hours).
The Decentering treatment component consists of a guided imagery exercise and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
Experimental: Values and committed action
Participants randomized to condition 4 will receive the Values and committed action treatment component. Total number of sessions: 2 (2 contact hours).
The Values and committed action treatment component consists of identification of personal values and committed action, and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
Experimental: Mindful attention + Decentering
Participants randomized to condition 5 will receive the Mindful attention treatment component and the Decentering treatment component in different orders. Total number of sessions: 4 (4 contact hours).
The Mindful attention treatment component consists of a breathing exercise and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
The Decentering treatment component consists of a guided imagery exercise and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
Experimental: Mindful attention + Values and committed action
Participants randomized to condition 6 will receive the Mindful attention treatment component and the Values and committed action treatment component in different orders. Total number of sessions: 4 (4 contact hours).
The Mindful attention treatment component consists of a breathing exercise and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
The Values and committed action treatment component consists of identification of personal values and committed action, and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
Experimental: Decentering + Values and committed action
Participants randomized to condition 7 will receive the Decentering treatment component and the Values and committed action treatment component in different orders. Total number of sessions: 4 (4 contact hours).
The Decentering treatment component consists of a guided imagery exercise and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
The Values and committed action treatment component consists of identification of personal values and committed action, and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
Experimental: Mindful attention + Decentering + Values and committed action
Participants randomized to condition 8 will receive the Mindful attention treatment component, the Decentering treatment component, and the Values and committed action treatment component in different orders. Total number of sessions: 6 (6 contact hours).
The Mindful attention treatment component consists of a breathing exercise and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
The Decentering treatment component consists of a guided imagery exercise and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.
The Values and committed action treatment component consists of identification of personal values and committed action, and is operationalized as two sessions (1 hour each) delivered over two weeks, i.e., one session per week, with homework between sessions. Sessions will be delivered online.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity (11-point Numeric Rating Scale, NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The NRS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain intensity during the last week. Answer format range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain); total score range: 0-10. A higher score yields more pain.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Pain interference (the 7-item subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory, BPI)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The BPI is a validated, self-report instrument assessing clinical pain. The BPI pain interference subscale assesses pain interference during the last week across 7 domains, i.e., general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Answer format range: 0 (no interference) to 10 (maximal interference); total score range: 0-10. A higher score yields more pain.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity (11-point Numeric Rating Scale, NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The NRS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain intensity during the last week. Answer format range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain); total score range: 0-10. A higher score yields more pain.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Pain intensity (11-point Numeric Rating Scale, NRS)
Time Frame: Every day for 6 days following the first session (Td) for each treatment component
Pain intensity during the last 24 hours will be assessed every day for 6 days following the first session (Td) for each treatment component using the NRS. Answer format range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain); total score range: 0-10. A higher score yields more pain.
Every day for 6 days following the first session (Td) for each treatment component
Pain interference (the 7-item subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory, BPI)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The BPI is a validated, self-report instrument assessing clinical pain. The BPI pain interference subscale assesses pain interference during the last week across 7 domains, i.e., general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Answer format range: 0 (no interference) to 10 (maximal interference); total score range: 0-10. A higher score yields more pain.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Pain interference (1 aggregated item assessing pain interference during the last 24 hours within the 7 domains measured with the Brief Pain Inventory, BPI, interference subscale)
Time Frame: Every day for 6 days following the first session (Td) for each treatment component
Pain interference during the last 24 hours will be assessed every day for 6 days following the first session (Td) for each treatment component using 1 aggregated item assessing pain interference across the 7 domains measured with the BPI interference subscale, i.e., general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Answer format range: 0 (no interference) to 10 (maximal interference); total score range: 0-10. A higher score yields more pain..
Every day for 6 days following the first session (Td) for each treatment component
Pain burden (11-point Numeric Rating Scale, NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The NRS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain burden during the last week. Answer format range: 0 (no burden) to 10 (maximal burden); total score range: 0-10. A higher score yields more pain burden.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Pain burden (11-point Numeric Rating Scale, NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The NRS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain burden during the last week. Answer format range: 0 (no burden) to 10 (maximal burden); total score range: 0-10. A higher score yields more pain burden.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Pain quality (the 22-item pain descriptors from the McGill Pain Questionnaire, MPQ)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The pain descriptors from the MPQ constitutes a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain quality (i.e., pain type, namely continuous pain, intermittent pain, neuropathic pain, affective pain) during the last week. Answer format range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain); total score range: 0-60 (continuous, neuropathic and intermittent pain), 0-40 (affective pain). Higher scores yield more pain.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Pain quality (the 22-item pain descriptors from the McGill Pain Questionnaire, MPQ)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The pain descriptors from the MPQ constitutes a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain quality (i.e., pain type, namely continuous pain, intermittent pain, neuropathic pain, affective pain) during the last week. Answer format range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain); total score range: 0-60 (continuous, neuropathic and intermittent pain), 0-40 (affective pain). Higher scores yield more pain.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Pain frequency (1 item)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Pain frequency will be assessed using a single question. Answer format range: 1 (never) to 5 (all the time); total score range: 1-5. Higher scores yield higher pain frequency.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Pain frequency (1 item)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Pain frequency will be assessed using a single question. Answer format range: 1 (never) to 5 (all the time); total score range: 1-5. Higher scores yield higher pain frequency.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Pain catastrophizing (the 13-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PCS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The PCS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain catastrophizing. Answer format range: 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time); total score range: 0-52. Higher scores yield more pain catastrophizing.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Pain catastrophizing (the 13-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PCS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The PCS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain catastrophizing. Answer format range: 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time); total score range: 0-52. Higher scores yield more pain catastrophizing.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Psychological distress (the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The HADS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing psychological distress during the last week. Answer format range: 0 (not at all or never) to 3 (most or all of the time); total score range 0-42. Higher scores yield more psychological distress.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Psychological distress (the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The HADS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing psychological distress during the last week. Answer format range: 0 (not at all or never) to 3 (most or all of the time); total score range 0-42. Higher scores yield more psychological distress.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Fear of cancer recurrence (the 9-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory, FCRI)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The FCRI is a validated, self-report instrument assessing fear of cancer recurrence during the last month. Answer format range: 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal); total score range 0-36. Higher scores yield more fear of cancer recurrence.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Fear of cancer recurrence (the 9-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory, FCRI)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The FCRI is a validated, self-report instrument assessing fear of cancer recurrence during the last month. Answer format range: 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal); total score range 0-36. Higher scores yield more fear of cancer recurrence.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Well-being (the 5-item WHO-5 Well-Being Index, WHO-5)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The WHO-5 is a validated, self-report instrument assessing current well-being. Answer format range: 0 (at no time) to 5 (all the time); total score range: 0-100. Higher scores yield more well-being.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Well-being (the 5-item WHO-5 Well-Being Index, WHO-5)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The WHO-5 is a validated, self-report instrument assessing current well-being. Answer format range: 0 (at no time) to 5 (all the time); total score range: 0-100. Higher scores yield more well-being.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Moderator: Socio-demographic characteristics
Time Frame: Baseline (T1)
Socio-demographic characteristics will be assessed using single questions (e.g., marital status, income, work status).
Baseline (T1)
Moderator: Clinical characteristics
Time Frame: Baseline (T1)
Clinical data will be obtained from the register of the national Danish Breast Cancer Group (DCBG), including disease characteristics (e.g., date of diagnosis; endocrine receptor status; menopausal status) and allocated treatment protocol (e.g., type of primary surgery; radiotherapy (yes/no); endocrine therapy (yes/no); Herceptin treatment (yes/no); Zoledronic acid (yes/no)).
Baseline (T1)
Moderator: Treatment expectancy
Time Frame: Baseline (T1)
Treatment expectancy will be assessed using a single question regarding the extent to which the participant expects that the intervention to reduce pain and increase overall well-being. Answer format range: 1 (not at all) to 5 (a great deal); total score range: 1-5. Higher scores indicate stronger expectations that the intervention will lead to a positive outcome.
Baseline (T1)
Moderator: Therapeutic alliance (the 12-item Working Alliance Inventory, WAI) Revised Short Form
Time Frame: 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The WAI is a validated, self-report instrument assessing therapeutic alliance. Answer format range: 1 (never) to 7 (all the time); total score range: 12-84. Higher scores yield a stronger therapeutic alliance.
1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Moderator: Homework
Time Frame: Before each session (Ts), 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2), and 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (follow-up, T3)
Homework will be assessed with 4 single items related to i) whether homework has been conducted (yes/no), and the ii) type, iii) frequency (number of days per week), and iv) duration of completed homework (average number of minutes per day).
Before each session (Ts), 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2), and 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (follow-up, T3)
Mediator: Mindful attention (the 15-item Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The MAAS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing individual differences in the frequency of mindful states over time. Answer format range: 1 (almost always) to 6 (almost never); total score range: 1-6. Higher scores yield higher levels of mindful attention.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Mediator: Mindful attention (the 15-item Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The MAAS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing individual differences in the frequency of mindful states over time. Answer format range: 1 (almost always) to 6 (almost never); total score range: 1-6. Higher scores yield higher levels of mindful attention.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Mediator: Mindful attention (2 items from the 15-item Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS)
Time Frame: Before each session (Ts)
MAAS items 13 and 7 will be assessed before each session (Ts). Answer format range: 1 (almost always) to 6 (almost never). Higher scores yield higher levels of mindful attention.
Before each session (Ts)
Mediator: Mindful attention (1 item from the 15-item Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS)
Time Frame: Every day for 6 days following the first session for each treatment component (Td)
MAAS item 7 will be assessed every day for 6 days following the first session (Td) for each treatment component. Answer format range: 1 (almost always) to 6 (almost never). Higher scores yield higher levels of mindful attention.
Every day for 6 days following the first session for each treatment component (Td)
Mediator: Decentering (the 11-item Experiences Questionnaire, EQ)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The EQ is a validated, self-report instrument assessing decentering. Answer format range: 1 (do not agree at all) to 5 (agree completely); total score range: 11-55. Higher scores yield higher levels of decentering.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Mediator: Decentering (the 11-item Experiences Questionnaire, EQ)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The EQ is a validated, self-report instrument assessing decentering. Answer format range: 1 (do not agree at all) to 5 (agree completely); total score range: 11-55. Higher scores yield higher levels of decentering.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Mediator: Decentering (2 items from the 11-item Experiences Questionnaire, EQ)
Time Frame: Before each session (Ts)
EQ items 5 and 7 will be assessed before each session (Ts). Answer format range: 1 (do not agree at all) to 5 (agree completely). Higher scores yield higher levels of decentering.
Before each session (Ts)
Mediator: Decentering (1 item from the 11-item Experiences Questionnaire, EQ)
Time Frame: Every day for 6 days following the first session for each treatment component (Td)
EQ item 5 will be assessed every day for 6 days following the first session (Td) for each treatment component. Answer format range: 1 (do not agree at all) to 5 (agree completely). Higher scores yield higher levels of decentering.
Every day for 6 days following the first session for each treatment component (Td)
Mediator: Pain acceptance and activity engagement (the 20-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Scale, CPAS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
The CPAS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain acceptance and activity engagement. Answer format range: 0 (never true) to 6 (always true); subscale score range: 0-54 (pain acceptance subscale), 0-66 (activity engagement subscale). Higher scores yield more acceptance and activity engagement.
Baseline (T1) to 1 week after last session (Post-intervention, T2)
Mediator: Pain acceptance and activity engagement (the 20-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Scale, CPAS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
The CPAS is a validated, self-report instrument assessing pain acceptance and activity engagement. Answer format range: 0 (never true) to 6 (always true); subscale score range: 0-54 (pain acceptance subscale), 0-66 (activity engagement subscale). Higher scores yield more acceptance and activity engagement.
Baseline (T1) to 12 weeks after post-intervention (T2) (Follow-up, T3)
Mediator: Activity engagement (2 items from the 20-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Scale, CPAS)
Time Frame: Before each session (Ts)
CPAS items 1 and 12 will be assessed before each session (Ts). Answer format range: 0 (never true) to 6 (always true). Higher scores yield more activity engagement.
Before each session (Ts)
Mediator: Activity engagement (1 item from the 20-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Scale, CPAS)
Time Frame: Every day for 6 days following the first session for each treatment component (Td)
CPAS item 1 will be assessed every day for 6 days following the first session (Td) for each treatment component. Answer format range: 0 (never true) to 6 (always true). Higher scores yield more activity engagement
Every day for 6 days following the first session for each treatment component (Td)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Zachariae, DMSc, University of Aarhus

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All data underlying publication will be shared in accordance with current data sharing regulations at host institutions.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers aiming to publish IPD meta-analyses

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Mindful attention

3
Subscribe