A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) (PIVOT-PO)

March 6, 2026 updated by: Spero Therapeutics

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multicenter, Multinational Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenously Administered Imipenem-cilastatin in Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of oral TBP-PI-HBr as compared with intravenous (IV) imipenem-cilastatin with respect to the overall response (combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication) at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) visit in hospitalized adult participants (greater than or equal to (≥)18 years of age) with cUTI or AP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study included a pre-planned interim analysis with stopping criteria for efficacy and futility that was performed by an independent data monitoring committee (IDMC). For full details please refer to the protocol and statistical analysis plan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1690

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Medical facility
      • Córdoba, Argentina
        • Medical facility
      • La Plata, Argentina
        • Medical facility
      • Mendoza, Argentina
        • Medical facility
      • San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
        • Medical facility
      • Villa Regina, Argentina
        • Medical facility
      • Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
        • Medical facility
      • Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
        • Medical facility
      • Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
        • Medical facility
      • Barueri, Brazil
        • Medical facility
      • Campinas, Brazil
        • Medical facility
      • Curitiba, Brazil
        • Medical facility
      • Porto Alegre, Brazil
        • Medical facility
      • São José do Rio Preto, Brazil
        • Medical facility
      • Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Dobrich, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Gabrovo, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Lom, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Pleven, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Rousse, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Shumen, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Sliven, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Varna, Bulgaria
        • Medical facility
      • Slavonski Brod, Croatia
        • Medical facility
      • Split, Croatia
        • Medical facility
      • Zagreb, Croatia
        • Medical facility
      • Čakovec, Croatia
        • Medical facility
      • Kohtla-Järve, Estonia
        • Medical facility
      • Pärnu, Estonia
        • Medical facility
      • Tallinn, Estonia
        • Medical facility
      • Tartu, Estonia, 50406
        • Medical facility
      • Võru, Estonia
        • Medical facility
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Medical facility
      • Alexandroupoli, Greece
        • Medical facility
      • Athens, Greece
        • Medical facility
      • Ioannina, Greece
        • Medical facility
      • Pátrai, Greece
        • Medical facility
      • Thessaloniki, Greece
        • Medical facility
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Medical facility
      • Eger, Hungary
        • Medical facility
      • Kistarcsa, Hungary
        • Medical facility
      • Nyíregyháza, Hungary
        • Medical facility
      • Bangalore, India
        • Medical facility
      • Jaipur, India
        • Medical facility
      • Lucknow, India
        • Medical facility
      • Varanasi, India
        • Medical facility
    • Karnataka
      • Belagavi, Karnataka, India, 590010
        • Medical facility
      • Daugavpils, Latvia
        • Medical facility
      • Liepāja, Latvia
        • Medical facility
      • Riga, Latvia
        • Medical facility
      • Valmiera, Latvia
        • Medical facility
      • Chisinau, Moldova
        • Medical facility
      • Krakow, Poland
        • Medical facility
      • Lodz, Poland
        • Medical facility
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • Medical facility
      • Łęczna, Poland
        • Medical facility
      • Brasov, Romania
        • Medical facility
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • Medical facility
      • Craiova, Romania
        • Medical facility
      • Iași, Romania
        • Medical facility
      • Oradea, Romania
        • Medical facility
      • Timișoara, Romania
        • Medical facility
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • Medical facility
      • Kragujevac, Serbia
        • Medical facility
      • Niš, Serbia
        • Medical facility
      • Novi Sad, Serbia
        • Medical facility
      • Bratislava, Slovakia
        • Medical facility
      • Galanta, Slovakia
        • Medical facility
      • Lučenec, Slovakia
        • Medical facility
      • Malacky, Slovakia
        • Medical facility
      • Poprad, Slovakia
        • Medical facility
      • Benoni, South Africa
        • Medical facility
      • Durban, South Africa
        • Medical facility
      • Pretoria, South Africa
        • Medical facility
      • Tongaat, South Africa
        • Medical facility
      • Umhlanga, South Africa
        • Medical facility
      • Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Medical facility
      • Diyarbakır, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Medical facility
      • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Medical facility
      • Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Medical facility
      • Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Medical facility
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33144
        • Medical facility
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
        • Medical facility

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Have a diagnosis of cUTI or AP.
  2. Have an adequate urine specimen for evaluation and culture obtained within 24 hours prior to randomization with evidence of pyuria that includes at least one of the following:

    1. at least 10 white blood cells (WBCs) per high power field (HPF) in urine sediment
    2. at least 10 WBCs per millimeters cubed (mm^3) in unspun urine
    3. positive leukocyte esterase (LE) on urinalysis Note: Participants may be randomized and administered study drug prior to knowledge of urine culture results, but pyuria must be documented.
  3. Expectation, in the judgment of the Investigator, that the participant will survive with effective antimicrobial therapy and appropriate supportive care for the anticipated duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of any known or suspected disease or condition that may confound the assessment of efficacy.
  2. Gross hematuria requiring intervention other than administration of study drug or removal/placement of urinary tract instrumentation.
  3. Urinary tract surgery within 7 days prior to randomization or urinary tract surgery planned during the study period.
  4. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) of ≤30 milliliters per minute (mL/min), as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
  5. Anticipated concomitant use of non-study antimicrobial drug therapy between randomization and the LFU visit that would potentially effect outcome evaluations of cUTI/AP.
  6. Receipt of a potentially effective antimicrobial within 72 hours prior to study randomization.
  7. Severe hepatic impairment at Screening, as evidenced by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >5×upper limit of normal (ULN) or total bilirubin >3×ULN, or clinical signs of cirrhosis or end-stage hepatic disease (e.g., ascites, hepatic encephalopathy).
  8. Pregnant or lactating women.
  9. History of epilepsy or known seizure disorder (excluding a history of childhood febrile seizures).
  10. History of proven or suspected Clostridioides difficile associated diarrhoea.
  11. History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  12. QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >480 milliseconds (msec) based on screening ECG.
  13. History of known genetic metabolism anomaly associated with carnitine deficiency.
  14. Requirement for concomitant use of valproic acid, divalproex sodium, or probenecid between randomization and EOT.

Note: Other inclusion and exclusion criteria as per protocol may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TBP-PI-HBr
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 milligrams (mg), two x 300mg film-coated tablets, orally (PO) and a dummy infusion intravenously (IV), every 6 hours (q6h) from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than (>) 30 millilitres per minute (mL/min) and less than or equal to (≤) 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
TBP-PI-HBr film-coated immediate-release tablets.
Other Names:
  • SPR994
0.9% sodium chloride administered as IV infusion.
Active Comparator: Imipenem-cilastatin
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl less than (<) 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl levels greater than or equal to (≥) 60 to < 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels >30 to <60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Sterile powder for reconstitution administered as IV.
TBP-PI-HBr matching dummy tablets.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) Population
Time Frame: At Day 17 (TOC)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
At Day 17 (TOC)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
Time Frame: At Day 17 (TOC)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
At Day 17 (TOC)
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
Time Frame: At Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
At Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT and LFU Visits in the ME Population
Time Frame: At Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
At Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
Time Frame: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.
At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE Population
Time Frame: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.
At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
Time Frame: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.
At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
Time Frame: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, defined as reduction of Baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL on urine culture and negative repeated blood culture (if blood culture was positive at Baseline) ;Persistence, defined as Isolation from urine culture of ≥10^3 CFU/mL or from blood of any of the Baseline uropathogen(s) identified at study entry; Indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason.
At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
Time Frame: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, defined as reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL on urine culture and negative repeated blood culture (if blood culture was positive at Baseline); Persistence, defined as Isolation from urine culture of ≥10^3 CFU/mL or from blood of any of the Baseline uropathogen(s) identified at study entry; Indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason.
At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
Time Frame: Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
Time Frame: Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
Time Frame: Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)
Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted); Failure, including clinical relapse (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI); or Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.
Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
Time Frame: At Day 28 (LFU)
Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted); Failure, including clinical relapse (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI); or Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.
At Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
Time Frame: Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28(LFU)
Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure: Sustained clinical cure is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted; Failure, including clinical relapse: Clinical relapse is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI; Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.
Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28(LFU)
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
Time Frame: Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)
Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, including sustained microbiologic eradication, i.e.,microbiologic eradication at TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of original Baseline uropathogen at ≥10^3 CFU/mL;Persistence, including microbiologic recurrence, i.e.,isolation from urine culture at ≥10^3 CFU/mL or blood culture of any of Baseline uropathogen(s) at any time after documented eradication at TOC visit up to and including LFU visit; Microbiologic indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason. If a participant is assessed as a microbiological persistence at EOT, participant is automatically considered persistent at TOC and LFU. If assessed as persistent at TOC, participant is automatically considered a persistent at LFU.
Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
Time Frame: At Day 28 (LFU)
Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure: Sustained clinical cure is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted; Failure, including clinical relapse: Clinical relapse is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI; Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.
At Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
Time Frame: Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)
Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, including sustained microbiologic eradication, i.e.,microbiologic eradication at TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of original Baseline uropathogen at ≥10^3 CFU/mL;Persistence, including microbiologic recurrence, i.e.,isolation from urine culture at ≥10^3 CFU/mL or blood culture of any of Baseline uropathogen(s) at any time after documented eradication at TOC visit up to and including LFU visit; Microbiologic indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason. If a participant is assessed as a microbiological persistence at EOT, participant is automatically considered persistent at TOC and LFU. If assessed as persistent at TOC, participant is automatically considered a persistent at LFU.
Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
Time Frame: At Day 28 (LFU)
Participants will be evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as :Eradication, including sustained microbiologic eradication, i.e., microbiologic eradication at TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of original Baseline uropathogen at ≥10^3 CFU/mL;Persistence, including microbiologic recurrence, i.e.,isolation from urine culture at ≥10^3 CFU/mL or blood culture of any of Baseline uropathogen(s) at any time after documented eradication at TOC visit up to and including LFU visit; Microbiologic indeterminate:no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason. If a participant is assessed as a microbiological persistence at EOT,participant is automatically considered persistent at TOC and LFU. If assessed as persistent at TOC, participant is automatically considered a persistent at LFU.
At Day 28 (LFU)
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal investigational/experimental) product, whether or not related to this product. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose and regardless of causality that results in death, is life threatening, requires immediate or prolongation of hospitalization, results in significant disability, congenital anomaly and is a medically important reaction. TEAEs are defined as events that are newly occurring or worsening from the time of the first dose of IP through LFU.
From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Plasma Concentrations of TBP-PI-HBr
Time Frame: 0.25 hour (h), 0.5h, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 4h and 6h postdose at Day 2
0.25 hour (h), 0.5h, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 4h and 6h postdose at Day 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: David Hong, MD, Spero Therapeutics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 27, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Tract Infection

Clinical Trials on TBP-PI-HBr

Subscribe