Pain Reduction With Topical Bromfenac Versus Artificial Tear After Intravitreal Injection.

February 7, 2024 updated by: Sunir Garg MD, Wills Eye
The purpose of this prospective interventional study is to compare post-intravitreal injection pain between eyes receiving topical bromfenac versus artificial tears as an analgesic after intravitreal injection.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This proposed study is a double-masked randomized trial of adult patients receiving bilateral intravitreal injections. Patient data from March 2021 to June 2022 will be collected. Patient pain perception, quantified using the Wong-Baker FACES and the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire, will be utilized to compare post-intravitreal injection pain between eyes receiving pre-injection bromfenac 0.09% ophthalmic solution versus artificial tears.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

97

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • University of Toronto
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18017
        • Mid Atlantic Retina
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Mid Atlantic Retina
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78240
        • Retina Consultants of San Antonio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria are:

  • Current patient of the Wills Eye Hospital Retina Service including all Mid Atlantic Retina offices
  • Clinical indication of bilateral intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection as determined by the treating retina specialist for diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, macular edema. proliferative retinopathy, or macular edema associated with retina vein occlusion.
  • Age greater than 18
  • Patient's that have had at least three prior injections in each eye

Exclusion criteria are:

  • Prior ocular surgery (non-cataract)
  • Herpetic eye disease
  • Uncontrolled uveitis
  • Active conjunctivitis, keratitis or keratopathy
  • Current unilateral use of prescription eye drops.
  • Allergy to NSAID

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bromfenac 0.09%
At the time of the injection, the first eye will be randomized to a drop of artificial tear or bromfenac 0.09% and the second eye will receive the other agent.
The eyedrop (bromfenac) will be given to the assigned eye.
Placebo Comparator: Artificial Tear
At the time of the injection, the first eye will be randomized to a drop of artificial tear or bromfenac 0.09% and the second eye will receive the other agent.
The eyedrop (artificial tears) will be given to the assigned eye.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in post-injection pain at 5 minutes using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score
Time Frame: Patients will be asked in the office for their pain rating 5 minutes after injection
Patients will be asked to report their pain on the Short Form McGill Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score, ranging from 0 to 5, in which 5 is the worst pain level.
Patients will be asked in the office for their pain rating 5 minutes after injection
Change in post-injection pain at 5 minutes using the Wong-Baker Faces pain scale
Time Frame: Patients will be asked in the office for their pain rating 5 minutes after injection
Patients will be asked to report their pain on the Wong-Baker Faces pain scale, ranging from 0 through 10, in which 10 is the worst pain level.
Patients will be asked in the office for their pain rating 5 minutes after injection
Change in post-injection pain at 6 hours using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score.
Time Frame: Patients will be called for their rating 6 hours after injection
Patients will be asked to report their pain on the Short Form McGill Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score, ranging from 0 to 5, in which 5 is the worst pain level.
Patients will be called for their rating 6 hours after injection
Change in post-injection pain at 5 minutes using the Wong-Baker Faces pain scale
Time Frame: Patients will be called for their rating 6 hours after injection
from 0 through 10, in which 10 is the worst pain level.
Patients will be called for their rating 6 hours after injection
Change in post-injection pain at 24 hours using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score.
Time Frame: Patients will be called for their rating 24 hours after injection
Patients will be asked to report their pain on the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score, ranging from 0 to 5, in which 5 is the worst pain level.
Patients will be called for their rating 24 hours after injection
Change in post-injection pain at 5 minutes using the Wong-Baker Faces pain scale
Time Frame: Patients will be called for their rating 24 hours after injection
from 0 through 10, in which 10 is the worst pain level.
Patients will be called for their rating 24 hours after injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Only de-identified data will be shared amongst researchers.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Use of bromfenac 0.09% to reduce intravitreal injection pain

3
Subscribe