The IMPACT Implementation-Effectiveness Trial (IMPACT)

March 14, 2024 updated by: McMaster University

Implementing Physical Activity for Individuals With Cancer During Treatment: The IMPACT Implementation-Effectiveness Trial

More Canadians are surviving cancer, however, individuals with cancer live with side effects for years after treatments have ended. The physical and psychosocial benefits of regular physical activity (PA) during and after cancer treatment are well established. However, less than 30% of individuals with cancer meet current PA recommendations and PA levels decline significantly during treatment. PA services within the cancer institution to support well-being during treatment are not available for survivors across Ontario. Strategies are needed within cancer centres to close the gap between the evidence and clinical practice.

What is the purpose? To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel exercise and education strategy for individuals with cancer during treatment.

What are we proposing to do? This project includes two parts. In Part 1 participants will be put into one of three groups. Group 1 (Exercise & self-management) will include eight sessions of supervised, institution-based exercise and self-management education. Group 2 (self-management only) will include eight virtual self-management education sessions with an exercise professional. Group 3 will receive usual care (i.e., no intervention).

In Part 2 participants who attended less than 75% of their sessions will be asked to complete an interview on the barriers to continuing with the study during cancer treatment.

Why is this work important? Findings from this trial will inform the way PA services are provided within cancer institutions across Ontario. This novel strategy incorporates both institution-based and home-based exercise strategies during treatment and highlights the importance of individuals with cancer taking an active role in managing their condition during treatment. This can prevent future complications and decrease burden on the individual and the healthcare system. Results will inform future decisions on PA implementation strategies for cancer survivors with diverse needs across Ontario.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Rationale:

The burden of cancer in Canada is growing. More individuals are surviving cancer, however, individuals with cancer live with side effects for years after treatments have ended. The physical and psychosocial benefits of regular physical activity (PA) during and after cancer treatment are well established. However, less than 30% of individuals with cancer meet current PA recommendations and PA levels decline significantly during active treatment. Institution-based PA services to support wellbeing and minimize burden during treatment are not available across Ontario. Novel implementation strategies are needed within the institution to close the gap between the evidence and clinical practice. Implementation research allows us to understand how to deliver interventions effectively in diverse settings.

Aim & Objectives:

The overall aim of this project is to conduct a fully powered, multi-centred randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel implementation strategy including exercise and SM versus usual care for individuals with cancer during treatment. To do this, there are two main objectives: 1) Determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel implementation strategy using exercise and SM during treatment

Methods:

Study Design: Effectiveness-Implementation RCT Participants: Adults (>18 years) with a cancer diagnosis of any stage, currently receiving treatment, and cleared for exercise by their oncology care team will be included in this study.

Procedure: Participants will be randomized to three groups. Group 1: Exercise & SM: Eight sessions of supervised, in-person institution-based exercise and SM education. This group will also receive 4 booster sessions by telephone post intervention.

Group 2: SM Only: Eight virtual sessions of SM education using video conferencing with a qualified exercise professional. This group will also receive 4 booster sessions by phone post intervention.

Group 3: Usual care: No intervention.

Significance:

Implementation research is crucial to improving our understanding of real-world factors that impact successful application of research in healthcare settings. This novel implementation strategy builds off previous work and incorporates institution-based exercise and SM during treatment. Findings from this trial will build off our previous work and inform the way PA services are provided within cancer institutions across Ontario. Our goal is to make these services available to all individuals with cancer during treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

129

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-dwelling
  • English-speaking adults
  • Aged over 18 years of age
  • Currently undergoing adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, or hormonal therapy for cancer
  • Cleared by their oncologist to participate in moderate intensity aerobic exercise.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-report on the patient intake form any chronic condition, cognitive impairment, or injury that would prevent them from participating independently in moderate intensity exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
Experimental: Exercise & Self-Management
Eight sessions of moderate intensity aerobic exercise using recumbent bike within the cancer institution.
Eight 15 minute self-management e-modules related to exercise and physical activity for cancer survivors.
Experimental: Self-Management Only
Eight 15 minute self-management e-modules related to exercise and physical activity for cancer survivors.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity level
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire
16-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity level
Time Frame: 6-months
Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire
6-months
Physical activity level
Time Frame: 12-months
Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire
12-months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Total scores range from 0-108 with higher scores representing higher quality of life.
16-weeks
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6-months
Measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Total scores range from 0-108 with higher scores representing higher quality of life.
6-months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 12-months
Measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Total scores range from 0-108 with higher scores representing higher quality of life.
12-months
Level of exercise knowledge
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Measured using the 'Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire'. Total scores range from 8-56 with higher scores representing higher levels of exercise knowledge.
16-weeks
Level of exercise knowledge
Time Frame: 6-months
Measured using the 'Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire'. Total scores range from 8-56 with higher scores representing higher levels of exercise knowledge.
6-months
Level of exercise knowledge
Time Frame: 12-months
Measured using the 'Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire'. Total scores range from 8-56 with higher scores representing higher levels of exercise knowledge.
12-months
Health status
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Measured using the Eq-5d-3L VAS. Measured on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing higher levels perceived health status.
16-weeks
Health status
Time Frame: 6-months
Measured using the Eq-5d-3L VAS. Measured on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing higher levels perceived health status.
6-months
Health status
Time Frame: 12-months
Measured using the Eq-5d-3L VAS. Measured on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores representing higher levels perceived health status.
12-months
Aerobic capacity
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Six minute walk test
16-weeks
Aerobic capacity
Time Frame: 6-months
Six minute walk test
6-months
Aerobic capacity
Time Frame: 12-months
Six minute walk test
12-months
Cardiovascular outcomes - Blood pressure
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Resting Blood Pressure
16-weeks
Cardiovascular outcomes - Blood pressure
Time Frame: 6-months
Resting Blood Pressure
6-months
Cardiovascular outcomes - Blood pressure
Time Frame: 12-months
Resting Blood Pressure
12-months
Cardiovascular outcomes - Heart rate
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Resting heart rate
16-weeks
Cardiovascular outcomes - Heart rate
Time Frame: 6-months
Resting heart rate
6-months
Cardiovascular outcomes - Heart rate
Time Frame: 12-months
Resting heart rate
12-months
Health care utilization
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Measured using the 'Health care utilization scale'. Minimum score: 0, no maximum score. Higher values represent higher health care utilization and higher costs.
16-weeks
Health care utilization
Time Frame: 6-months
Measured using the 'Health care utilization scale'. Minimum score: 0, no maximum score. Higher values represent higher health care utilization and higher costs.
6-months
Health care utilization
Time Frame: 12-months
Measured using the 'Health care utilization scale'. Minimum score: 0, no maximum score. Higher values represent higher health care utilization and higher costs.
12-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IMPACT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Exercise

3
Subscribe