- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06355180
Esketamine vs ECT for Acute Suicidality
Esketamine Versus Electroconvulsive Therapy for Suicidal Ideation in Depressive Episodes: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China
- Beijing Chaoyang District Third Hospital
-
Beijing, China
- Beijing Daxing District Xinkang Hospital
-
Dali, China
- The Second People's Hospital of Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture
-
Hohhot, China
- Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Mental Health Center
-
-
Anhui
-
Wuhu, Anhui, China, 241002
- Wuhu Fourth People's Hospital
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100088
- Beijing Anding Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria (all five criteria must be met for an individual to be included):
- Outpatients or inpatients aged 18 to 65 years (inclusive);
- Having a current diagnosis of MDD or depressive episode in bipolar I/II disorder, established using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, version 7.0.2 (MINI 7.0.2) and according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria;
- Having a total score of 6 or more on the SSI at screening;
- Having at least primary school education and the ability to comprehend assessment scales;
- Having provided written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria (an individual will be excluded if any one of the following criteria is met):
- Having a current or historical diagnosis of neurodevelopmental, neurocognitive, psychotic, or substance-related disorders according to the DSM-5 criteria;
- Having active delusions or hallucinations;
- Suffering from severe/unstable systemic illness (illness affecting the central nervous system, cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal, endocrine, or hematologic systems) and judged by the investigator as unsuitable for participation;
- Being judged by the investigator as at risk for substance abuse or addiction;
- Using reserpine currently;
- Contraindications to general anesthesia;
- Having a history of seizure disorders (except for uncomplicated childhood febrile seizures);
- Having severe drug or food allergies or allergy to any component of the study medication;
- Having a history of treatment non-response or severe adverse reactions to esketamine, ketamine, or ECT;
- Having participated in any other clinical trials within the three months before the enrollment;
- Being pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant (for female participants) or planning to father a child (for male participants) during the study or within 12 weeks after the last dose of medication;
- Being judged by researchers as unsuitable for participation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intravenous esketamine
The experimental group will receive six administrations of adjunctive intravenous esketamine over a two-week intervention period, followed by a 10-week observational follow-up phase.
|
The experimental group will receive intravenous esketamine hydrochloride.
Participants will be asked to fast for 8 hours prior to administration.
On treatment days, esketamine will be administered at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg, diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride solution.
The infusion rate will be controlled with an infusion pump or syringe pump to ensure a minimum administration duration of 40 minutes.
Treatment will be administered three times per week (the recommended interval between sessions is 1 to 2 days, adjustable based on clinical judgment) for two consecutive weeks, totaling six sessions.
For participants demonstrating intolerance to either the dose of 0.2 mg/kg or the six-session regimen, investigators could modify the treatment protocol based on efficacy and safety assessments.
|
|
Active Comparator: Electroconvulsive therapy
The control group will receive six administrations of adjunctive ECT over a two-week intervention period, followed by a 10-week observational follow-up phase.
|
The control group will receive ECT. Prior to each session, participants will undergo safety evaluations and concomitant medication adjustments.
Following an 8-hour fast and bladder evacuation, other preoperative preparations include intravenous administration of anticholinergic agents, short-acting anesthetics, and muscle relaxants.
Electrodes will be placed unilaterally on the non-dominant hemisphere, with the seizure threshold determined via titration.
The treatment will be administered three times per week (the recommended interval between sessions is 1 to 2 days, adjustable based on clinical judgment) for two consecutive weeks (six sessions in total).
The protocol permitted regimen modifications for participants unable to tolerate the full course, based on efficacy and safety assessments.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Remission rate of suicidal ideation
Time Frame: Baseline, after the sixth treatments (week 2)
|
The Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI) is a 19-item clinician-administered scale assessing the severity of suicidal ideation. Each item is scored from 0 to 2, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 38, with higher scores indicating greater suicidal intent. The primary outcome is the rate of remission of suicidal ideation following the 2-week intervention (after 6 treatments), with the remission of suicidal ideation defined as having an SSI score of less than 4 (which indicates the absence of clinically significant suicidal ideation). |
Baseline, after the sixth treatments (week 2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Remission rate of suicidal ideation
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Compare the suicide ideation remission rates between the two groups after the first treatment, after the third treatment, at week 4, week 8, and week 12. Suicide remission rate is defined as an SSI score of less than 4.
|
Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Rates of sustained remission and recurrence of suicide ideation
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Sustained remission: Defined as having SSI scores of less than 4 in two consecutive assessments. Recurrence: Defined as the emergence of suicidal behavior, an SSI score of 6 or more, or other composite indicators, following two consecutive assessments with SSI scores of less than 4. Compare the sustained remission rates and recurrence rates of suicidal ideation between the two groups after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12. |
Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in SSI Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Compare the changes in SSI scores at each visit compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Compare the changes in C-SSRS scores at each visit compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Response rate of depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Response of depressive symptoms is defined as a 50% or more reduction from baseline in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS) score.
Compare the response rates of depressive symptoms between the two groups at each visit.
|
Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Remission rate of depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Remission of depressive symptoms is defined as a MADRS score of less than 12. Compare the remission rates of depressive symptoms between the two groups at each visit.
|
Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Compare the changes in MADRS scores at each visit compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms Self Report (QIDS-SR-16) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Compare the changes in QIDS-SR-16 scores at each visit compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Compare the changes in CGI scores at each visit compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Self-reported questionnaire. The Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) is a condensed version of the SF-36 health survey, designed to measure health-related quality of life. It includes 12 questions covering physical and mental health domains. These questions generate two main scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS), which are standardized to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Compare the changes in SF-12 scores at each visit compared to baseline. |
Baseline, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Self-reported questionnaire. Scale Range: 0-30. Higher scores indicate greater functional impairment. Compare the changes in SDS scores at each visit compared to baseline. |
Baseline, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Digital Span Test (DST) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Self-reported questionnaire. Scale Range: 0-22. Higher scores indicate better working memory and attention. Compare the changes in DST scores at each visit compared to baseline. |
Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Self-reported questionnaire. Scale Range: 0-90. Higher scores indicate better cognitive processing speed and attention. Compare the changes in DSST scores at each visit compared to baseline. |
Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Perceived Deficit Questionnaire for Depression 5-item (PDQ-D-5) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Self-reported questionnaire. Scale Range: 0-20. Higher scores indicate a greater perceived cognitive deficit. Compare the changes in PDQ-D-5 scores at each visit compared to baseline. |
Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Clinician rated scales. Scale Range: 0-60. Higher scores indicate more severe manic symptoms. Compare the changes in YMRS scores at each visit compared to baseline. |
Baseline, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th esketamine treatments
|
Clinician rated scales. Scale Range: 0-92. Higher scores indicate more severe dissociative symptoms. Compare the changes in CADSS scores at each esketamine treatment compared to baseline. |
Baseline, after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th esketamine treatments
|
|
Adverse event
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
Compare the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events between the two groups.
|
Baseline, after the first treatment, after the third treatment, after the sixth treatment (week 2), at week 4, week 8, and week 12
|
|
Changes in neuroimaging metrics
Time Frame: Baseline, after the sixth treatments (week 2)
|
Explore changes in neuroimaging metrics after the sixth treatment compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, after the sixth treatments (week 2)
|
|
Changes in Electroencephalogram (EEG) metrics
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment, after the sixth treatments (week 2)
|
Explore changes in EEG metrics after the first and sixth treatment compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, after the first treatment, after the sixth treatments (week 2)
|
|
Changes in biological indicators
Time Frame: Baseline, after the first treatment, after the sixth treatments (week 2)
|
Biological samples (blood, urine, and feces) will be collected from a subset of participants at baseline, after the first treatment, and after the sixth treatment for multi-omics profiling, including genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic, metabolomic, microbiome, immunological, proteomic, and pharmacogenomic analyses.
|
Baseline, after the first treatment, after the sixth treatments (week 2)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gang Wang, MD, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Shoudufazhan2024-1-2122
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mood Disorders
-
Joliet Center for Clinical ResearchAbbottCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
Hanyang UniversityDSM-Firmenich AGActive, not recruiting
-
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedMood Disorders | Irritable MoodUnited States
-
Baskent UniversityZİYAFET UĞURLUCompletedDisaster; Personality | Disorder, MoodTurkey
-
Fayoum University HospitalCompletedKetamine-Induced Mood DisorderEgypt
-
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedHealthy | Mood DisorderUnited States
-
Shanghai Mental Health CenterActive, not recruitingMood Disorders in Children and AdolescentsChina
Clinical Trials on Esketamine
-
Riccardo GuglielmoRecruitingAnhedonia | Anxiety | Cognition | Apathy | Temperament | Psychiatric Comorbidities | Depression and Quality of Life | Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)Italy
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedTreatment Resistant Depressive DisorderUnited States, Japan, Belgium
-
Peking University First HospitalTianjin Medical University General HospitalNot yet recruitingPostoperative Delirium | Elderly | Noncardiac Surgery | Esketamine | Delayed Neurocognitive RecoveryChina
-
Qinghai UniversityQinghai Red Cross HospitalNot yet recruitingPostpartum Depression
-
Celon Pharma SANational Center for Research and Development, PolandCompleted
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompleted
-
University of Puerto RicoRecruitingTreatment-resistant Depression (TRD)Puerto Rico
-
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.Completed
-
Celon Pharma SANational Center for Research and Development, PolandCompletedMajor Depressive DisorderPoland
-
University of Sao PauloRecruiting