Exploring DBS Efficacy in Treatment-refractory Tourette's Syndrome

April 8, 2024 updated by: Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Investigating the Impact of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Treatment-refractory Tourette's Syndrome (TR-TS)

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with Treatment-refractory Tourette's syndrome (TR-TS) implantation targeting the Antero-medial globus pallidus interna (GPi), Antero-medial globus pallidus interna (amGPi), Postero-ventrolateral GPi (pvGPi), Centromedian nucleus, substantia periventricularis and nucleus ventro-oralis internus (Cm-Spv-Voi), Centre median nucleus and nucleus ventro-oralis (Cm-Voi), or Nucleus Accumbens/ Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule (NA-ALIC), or other unreported nuclei targets.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Tourette's Syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by repetitive, involuntary movements and vocalizations known as tics. It typically manifests in childhood and may persist into adulthood. The prevalence of TS varies globally, affecting approximately 1% of the population. Males are more commonly affected than females, and there is a broad spectrum of symptom severity. Treatment-refractory Tourette's Syndrome (TR-TS) refers to cases where standard therapeutic interventions, such as behavioural therapy and medications, have shown limited effectiveness. TR-TS prevalence is relatively lower but highlights the challenges in managing severe and persistent symptoms. In a comprehensive survey of diverse neuromodulation therapies, targeting specific nuclei with DBS has the most potential for TR-TS with apparent symptoms. The stimulation targets of DBS for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder include GPi, amGPi, pvGPi, Cm-Spv-Voi, Cm-Voi, and NA-ALIC. However, the DBS case reports are limited and lack high-quality, evidence-based medical evidence. So, this cohort study focuses on the effectiveness of DBS-targeted GPi, amGPi, pvGPi, Cm-Spv-Voi, Cm-Voi, NA-ALIC, or other unreported nuclei targets on TR-TS.

Another goal of this program is to study the neuronal activity of the GPi, amGPi, pvGPi, Cm-Spv-Voi, Cm-Voi, and NA-ALIC, or other unreported nuclei targets, respectively. At the same time, some subjects are presented with a task involving an unexpected reward. This separate study is an option and will not affect current study participation.

Some participants will also be invited to join a related study that involves positron emission tomography (PET) scanning to determine how the stimulation changes activity in the brain. Participation in the separate PET study is optional and will not affect current study participation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Xiaolei Liu, MD & PhD
  • Phone Number: +86 10 83198650
  • Email: ring@vip.163.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. aged 18-65;
  2. able to provide written informed consent;
  3. have a diagnosis of Tourette's syndrome according to the Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition-Text Revised (DSM-IV-TR) criteria and confirmed by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Chinese version 5.0;
  4. with a YGTSS of at least 35 for at least 12 months before surgery, while YGTSS- Total Motor≥15;
  5. must have failed conventional medical treatment at adequate therapeutic doses of three classes of medication lasting for at least three months;
  6. must not be suitable for behavioural intervention or that this intervention is inappropriate or unsuccessful;
  7. have been on stable comorbid conditions without suicidal ideation for at least six months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. presence of other psychotic disorders;
  2. have a treatment history that includes electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), DBS, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS);
  3. presents a suicide risk (defined as a HAMD-17 score of ≥3 on suicide-related items);
  4. experience difficulty in effectively communicating with investigators;
  5. with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI);
  6. with intracranial or cardiovascular stents;
  7. substance abuse within the past six months;
  8. unstable neurological or coagulation disorders;
  9. women who are pregnant, lactating, or of childbearing potential who refuse the use of reliable contraception during the study;
  10. have been involved in other clinical studies within three months before enrollment in this study;
  11. any conditions considered by the study group.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with Treatment-refractory Tourette's syndrome (TR-TS)
Patients will undergo bilateral DBS lead implantation.
The DBS lead is stereotactically introduced into the target in the brain (GPi, amGPi, pvGPi, Cm-Spv-Voi, Cm-Voi, NA-ALIC, or other unreported nuclei targets) and fixed to the skull; the lead is then connected to a neurostimulator implanted subcutaneously in the subclavicular region.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS): Reduction in total tics on the YGTSS after 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months post-surgery
The YGTSS is a 10-item semi-structured clinician-rating instrument that evaluates motor and phonic symptoms' number, frequency, intensity, complexity, and interference. The items about the tic ratings are scored on two subscales: motor tics and phonic tics. Behaviors are rated on a 6-point scale. The Total Tic Severity Score ranges from 0-50, with a higher score indicating a higher severity of symptoms.
Baseline to 6 months post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
YGTSS-Total Motor: Change in YGTSS-Total Motor at week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
The YGTSS motor tics are rated on a 6-point scale. The score ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating a higher severity of symptoms.
Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
YGTSS-Total Phonic: Change in YGTSS-Total phonic at week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
The YGTSS phonic tics are rated on a 6-point scale. The score ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating a higher severity of symptoms.
Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
YGTSS: remission, and response rate
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Remission (defined as YGTSS total score ≤14) at Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12; response is a ≥35% reduction in YGTSS total score from baseline to Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12.
Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS): Change in Y-BOCS at week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

The Y-BOCS scale is a clinician-rated, 10-item scale, each item rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), yielding a total possible score range from 0 to 40. The total score is usually computed from the subscales for obsessions (items 1-5) and compulsions (items 6-10).

The results can be interpreted based on the total score: 0-7 is sub-clinical; 8-15 is mild; 16-23 is moderate; 24-31 is severe; 32-40 is extreme.

The Y-BOCS scale is a clinician-rated, 10-item scale, each item rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), yielding a total possible score range from 0 to 40. The total score is usually computed from the subscales for obsessions (items 1-5) and compulsions (items 6-10).

The results can be interpreted based on the total score: 0-7 is sub-clinical; 8-15 is mild; 16-23 is moderate; 24-31 is severe; 32-40 is extreme.

Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA): the change from baseline to 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months in the HAMA total score.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
HAMA is a 14-item test measuring the severity of anxiety symptoms. The total anxiety score ranges from zero to 56, with higher scores indicating more anxiety. The seven psychic anxiety items elicit a psychic anxiety score that ranges from 0 to 28. The remaining seven items yield a somatic anxiety score ranging from 0 to 28.
Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17): the changes of HAMD-17 scores and its subscales from baseline to 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
HAMD-17 ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression; a score of 20 or more indicates moderate to severe depression.
Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): the change of PSQI from baseline to Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

Consisting of 19 items, the PSQI measures several aspects of sleep, offering seven component scores and one composite score. The component scores consist of subjective sleep quality, sleep latency (i.e., how long it takes to fall asleep), sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency (i.e., the percentage of time in bed that one is asleep), sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.

Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.

Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S): the change from baseline to 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
The clinical global impression-severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. Score 1 presents normal, not at all ill, and score 7 presents among the most extremely ill patients.
Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I): CGI-I score at Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
The clinical global impression-improvement scale (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. Score 1 presents the patient as much improved, and score 7 presents much worse.
Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
EuroQol-5 Dimension-level Scale (EQ-5D-5L): the change from baseline to Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12 in EQ-5D-5L.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
EQ-5D-5L is an instrument that evaluates the generic quality of life. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The score ranges from 5 (having no problems) to 25 (being unable to do/having extreme problems).
Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS): the change from baseline to Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
This scale has 11 items and is based on the patient's subjective report of his or her clinical condition over the previous 48 hours. There are four items that are graded on a 0 to 8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe mania. A score of 0 to 5 means no obvious manic symptoms; a score of 6 to 10 means definite manic symptoms; a score of 22 or above means severe manic symptoms. It will be used as a systematic screen for DBS-induced mania or hypomania. Although scores above 8 have been considered evidence of manic symptomatology in bipolar patients, the unmasked physician will use this scale and screening questions to assess whether any hypomanic symptoms require clinical intervention including DBS adjustment.
Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Safety as indicated by the number of Adverse Events: Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12.
Time Frame: Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12

Possible Adverse Events include:

Major and minor adverse events will be evaluated by Adverse Events Questionnaire (AEQ) and accompanying Case Report Form (AEQ CRF) in multiple domains, including psychiatric, neurological, and cognitive effects. The AEQ includes cognitive and behavioral screening items used in the Xuanwu DBS clinic for movement disorder patients. Additionally, we have added items for the adverse events observed in pilot DBS for TR-TS.

Baseline to week 2, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Change from baseline in the Verbal Fluency Test (COWAT)
Time Frame: 1 year after neurostimulator implantation.
During the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), individuals are tasked with verbally generating words starting with different letters of the alphabet. They have 60 seconds for each letter to retrieve and articulate as many words as possible. The test involves presenting three letters, each progressively more challenging in associative difficulty. Scores are derived by summing the total words produced across the three letter trials. The lowest achievable score is zero, indicating an inability to generate any words. There is no upper limit to the score as participants can produce numerous words for each letter. Higher scores reflect superior word retrieval and cognitive function.
1 year after neurostimulator implantation.
Change from baseline in the Trailmaking Test A&B
Time Frame: 1 year after neurostimulator implantation.
The Trail Making Test A and B assess cognitive shifting, visual search speed, scanning, processing speed, mental flexibility, and executive functioning. It evaluates the participant's capacity for sequencing (Parts A and B), cognitive set shifting (Part B), and processing speed (Parts A and B). Scores for Part A and Part B are calculated independently, indicating the number of seconds required for the participant to finish each section. Higher scores denote longer durations for completing the test.
1 year after neurostimulator implantation.
Change in Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
Time Frame: 1 year after neurostimulator implantation.
The Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test (ROCF) is a neuropsychological assessment in which patients are asked to reproduce a complicated line drawing, first by copying it freehand (recognition), and then drawing from memory (recall). Scoring of drawings is based on the widely used 36-point scoring system (0 being the worst score and 36 the best).
1 year after neurostimulator implantation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hongxing Wang, MD & PhD, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tourette's Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)

3
Subscribe