Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Benefit of Adding Stretching to Standard Intervention For Patients With Nonspecific Mechanical Neck Pain

9. Oktober 2019 aktualisiert von: Everett Lohman, Loma Linda University
The purpose of this study is to assess the benefit of adding stretching exercises to cervical mobilization and cervical range of motion exercises on cervical range of motion, pain, pain threshold, level of disability and patient satisfaction for patient with non-specific mechanical neck pain

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

All recruited participants will sign a statement of informed consent. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups (combined intervention group and standard intervention group). The following questionnaires were completed in the following order: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC). Next, Cervical Range of Motion (ROM) and Pain threshold were measured for both groups. The combined intervention group received the cervical passive mobilization, stretching, and home program (Stretching and ROM exercise). The standard intervention group received cervical mobilization and home program (ROM exercises).

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

43

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92354
        • Loma Linda U

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 60 Jahre (Erwachsene)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participant will be eligible to participate in the study if he or she is between 18 and 60 years of age, had non-specific neck pain for at least 2 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be excluded from the study if they had one or more of the following conditions: had previous surgery in cervical spine area, chronic disease such as diabetes, vertigo, dizziness, fracture of the cervical vertebra or scapula, multiple sclerosis, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis as approximately 60% of people who aged between 50-60 years will have osteoarthritis.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: The combined intervention group
The combined intervention group will receive the cervical passive mobilization, stretching, and home program (Stretching and ROM exercise).
Sonstiges: combined intervention group
The combined intervention group received the cervical passive mobilization, stretching, and home program (Stretching and ROM exercise).Stretching, cervical passive mobilization, and range of motion: The manual therapy was conducted by a physical therapist who has licensed from the California Board of Physical Therapy. The cervical passive mobilization were selected by the physical therapist based on the participant's condition. Stretching techniques were performed in the combined intervention group for 30 seconds and repeated 3 times twice a week in the following order on the following muscles: anterior, middle and posterior scalene, upper fibers of trapezius, pectoralis minor and interspinous muscles .AROM Exercise were performed 10 repetitions 3-4 times daily. The ACROM exercise consisted of the subject placing fingers over the manubrium bone and placing chin on the fingers. The subject was then instructed to rotate to one side as far as possible and return to neutral.
Aktiver Komparator: The standard intervention
The standard intervention group will receive cervical mobilization and home program (ROM exercises).
Sonstiges: The standard intervention

The standard intervention group will receive cervical mobilization and home program (ROM exercises).

Cervical mobilization and range of motion: The manual therapy was conducted by a physical therapist who has experience in manual therapy and is licensed from the California Board of Physical Therapy. The manual therapy intervention will consist of Passive Accessory Intervertebral Movements (PAIVMs). The nature of PAIVMs techniques was selected by the physical therapist based on the participant's condition.

Active Cervical Range of Motion Exercises (ACROM) were performed 10 repetitions 3-4 times daily. Subjects were advised to maintain their usual activity within the limits of pain. The ACROM exercise consisted of the subject placing fingers over the manubrium bone and placing chin on the fingers. The subject was then instructed to rotate to one side as far as possible and return to neutral .

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Cervical Range of Motion
Zeitfenster: Participants ROM measurement at baselines
The cervical range of motion device (CROM) will be used to assess the changes in active range of motion for cervical rotation, flexion and extension when comparing baseline,week two, four and eight.
Participants ROM measurement at baselines
Cervical Range of Motion
Zeitfenster: Participants ROM measurement at week 2
The cervical range of motion device (CROM) will be used to assess the changes in active range of motion for cervical rotation, flexion and extension when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight.
Participants ROM measurement at week 2
Cervical Range of Motion
Zeitfenster: Participants measurement at week four
The cervical range of motion device (CROM) will be used to assess the changes in active range of motion for cervical rotation, flexion and extension when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight.
Participants measurement at week four
Cervical Range of Motion
Zeitfenster: Participants ROM measurement at week 8
The cervical range of motion device (CROM) will be used to assess the changes in active range of motion for cervical rotation, flexion and extension when comparing baseline,week two, four and eight.
Participants ROM measurement at week 8

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Zeitfenster: NPRS score at baseline
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is a liner outcome measurement used to determine the level of the participant's pain when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight. It consists of a straight 10 cm line that is scored from 0 to 10 with 10 mm intervals. The zero represents no pain while a 10 represents very severe pain that participant cannot stand. The standard error is correct as stated.
NPRS score at baseline
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Zeitfenster: NPRS score at week two
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is a liner outcome measurement used to determine the level of the participant's pain when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight. It consists of a straight 10 cm line that is scored from 0 to 10 with 10 mm intervals. The zero represents no pain while a 10 represents very severe pain that participant cannot stand.
NPRS score at week two
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Zeitfenster: NPRS score at week four
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is a liner outcome measurement used to determine the level of the participant's pain when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight. It consists of a straight 10 cm line that is scored from 0 to 10 with 10 mm intervals. The zero represents no pain while a 10 represents very severe pain that participant cannot stand.
NPRS score at week four
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Zeitfenster: NPRS score at week eight
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is a liner outcome measurement used to determine the level of the participant's pain when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight. It consists of a straight 10 cm line that is scored from 0 to 10 with 10 mm intervals. The zero represents no pain while a 10 represents very severe pain that participant cannot stand.
NPRS score at week eight
Neck Disability Index
Zeitfenster: NDI score at baseline
Neck disability index measuring the level of neck disability when comparing baseline, week two, four, and eight. It consists of ten items each item is scored from 0 to 5 with a minimum score 0 and highest score 50. A score of zero (0) represents no disability while a score of 50 represents severe, full disability.
NDI score at baseline
Neck Disability Index
Zeitfenster: NDI score at week two
Neck disability index measuring the level of neck disability when comparing baseline, week two, four, and eight. It consists of ten items each item is scored from 0 to 5 with a minimum score 0 and highest score 50. A score of zero (0) represents no disability while a score of 50 represents severe, full disability.
NDI score at week two
Neck Disability Index
Zeitfenster: NDI score at week four
Neck disability index measuring the level of neck disability when comparing baseline, week two, four, and eight. It consists of ten items each item is scored from 0 to 5 with a minimum score 0 and highest score 50. A score of zero (0) represents no disability while a score of 50 represents severe, full disability.
NDI score at week four
Neck Disability Index
Zeitfenster: NDI score at week eight
Neck disability index measuring the level of neck disability when comparing baseline, week two, four, and eight. It consists of ten items each item is scored from 0 to 5 with a minimum score 0 and highest score 50. A score of zero (0) represents no disability while a score of 50 represents severe, full disability.
NDI score at week eight
Global Rating of Change
Zeitfenster: GROC score at week two
The Global rating of change (GROC) is used to measure the amount of improvement that the patient achieves from the intervention or rehabilitation program when comparing baseline, week two, four, and eight. The score ranges from -7 to 0 to 7 in which -/+3 to -/+ 1 represents a small change, -/+ 4 to -/+5 represents moderate change and -/+6 to -/+7 means a large change. The negative and positive means the patient condition worsens or improves respectively. The points are scores on a scale (-7-0-+7 = 15 point scale).
GROC score at week two
Global Rating of Change
Zeitfenster: GROC score at week four
The Global rating of change (GROC) is used to measure the amount of improvement that the patient achieves from the intervention or rehabilitation program when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight. The score ranges from -7 to 0 to 7 in which -/+3 to -/+ 1 represents a small change, -/+ 4 to -/+5 represents moderate change and -/+6 to -/+7 means a large change. The negative and positive means the patient condition worsens or improves respectively.
GROC score at week four
Global Rating of Change
Zeitfenster: GROC score at week eight
The Global rating of change (GROC) is used to measure the amount of improvement that the patient achieves from the intervention or rehabilitation program when comparing baseline, week two, four and right. The score ranges from -7 to 0 to 7 in which -/+3 to -/+ 1 represents a small change, -/+ 4 to -/+5 represents moderate change and -/+6 to -/+7 means a large change. The negative and positive means the patient condition worsens or improves respectively.
GROC score at week eight
Pressure Pain Threshold
Zeitfenster: Pressure Pain Threshold score at baseline
Pressure pain threshold is an electronic device used to measure the amount of force that is required to produce pain when comparing baseline, week two, four, and eight.
Pressure Pain Threshold score at baseline
Pressure Pain Threshold
Zeitfenster: Pressure Pain Threshold score at week two
Pressure pain threshold is an electronic device used to measure the amount of force that is required to produce pain when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight.
Pressure Pain Threshold score at week two
Pressure Pain Threshold
Zeitfenster: Pressure Pain Threshold score at week four
Pressure pain threshold is an electronic device used to measure the amount of force that is required to produce pain when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight.
Pressure Pain Threshold score at week four
Pressure Pain Threshold
Zeitfenster: Pressure Pain Threshold score at week eight
Pressure pain threshold is an electronic device used to measure the amount of force that is required to produce pain when comparing baseline, week two, four and eight.
Pressure Pain Threshold score at week eight

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Loma Linda University

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Everett B Lohman, Loma Linda U

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

24. August 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

8. Januar 2018

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

8. Januar 2018

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

13. Juni 2017

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

20. Juni 2017

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

21. Juni 2017

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

31. Oktober 2019

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

9. Oktober 2019

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Oktober 2019

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 5160230

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Nackenschmerzen

Klinische Studien zur combined intervention group

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Venezuela

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

3
Abonnieren