Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Monatliche Überwachung von Plasma-NfL bei behandelter schubförmig remittierender Multipler Sklerose zur Erkennung persistierender infraklinscher Krankheitsaktivität (MoMo-NfL)

2. November 2026 aktualisiert von: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Monatliche Überwachung von Plasma-NfL bei behandelter RRMS zur Erkennung persistierender infra-klinischer Krankheitsaktivität

Reference MRI scan is recommended 6 months after treatment onset in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and follow-up scans at 12 months later to monitor subclinical activity. When monitoring treatment response in patients treated with disease modifying treatments (DMTs), the measurement of new or enlarging T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions (NELs) is the preferred MRI method supplemented by contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) for monitoring treatment response. However, some studies have suggested the deposition of gadolinium-based contrast agents in the basal ganglia and dentate nucleus of patients who underwent serial MRI acquisitions. Although significant clinical consequences of these deposits have not been demonstrated, further studies are required to better understand the potential long-term biological and clinical effects of gadolinium administration. To circumvent this potential risk, several recommendations suggested avoiding unnecessary use of gadolinium for follow-up scans. New sequences are also developed to replace gadolinium injection for the detection of active lesions. Moreover, MRI remains costly and time-consuming. In addition, systematic yearly MRI monitoring is not adapted to detect silent active lesions. This can delay identification of treatment failure and increase the risk of relapses and disability worsening, especially in the context of escalation therapy.

Therefore, biological markers could allow more frequent analysis of disease activity and detect treatment failure earlier than classical clinical and MRI monitoring. Their use would greatly help clinicians to switch for high efficacy treatments (HET) and avoid potential relapses.

Measurement of a structural axonal protein, neurofilament, in serum or plasma has shown promise as a marker of neuroaxonal injury and a measure of treatment response. In MS, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament-light chain (NfL) is also increased and is positively associated with MRI lesion load and disability scores and is a marker of treatment response.

WThe study authors hypothesize that monthly plasma neurofilament-light chain (pNfL) monitoring can sensitively highlight subclinical (radiological disease activity) RDA by performing early MRI scans to confirm EDA and lead to timely treatment escalation.

The main objective of this study is to compare the time to EDA in both arms (monthly pNfL monitoring vs. standard care with regular MRI scans), in patients with EDA.

Studienübersicht

Status

Rekrutierung

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

84

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

      • Montpellier, Frankreich, 34295
        • Rekrutierung
        • CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Guy de Chauliac
        • Kontakt:
      • Nantes, Frankreich, 44000
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • CHU de Nantes
        • Kontakt:
      • Nice, Frankreich
      • Nîmes, Frankreich
        • Rekrutierung
        • CHU de Nîmes
        • Kontakt:
      • Paris, Frankreich, 75013
        • Rekrutierung
        • AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière
        • Kontakt:
      • Rennes, Frankreich
        • Noch keine Rekrutierung
        • CHU de Rennes
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 55 Jahre (Erwachsene)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with RRMS according to 2024 McDonald's criteria.
  • Less than 10 years from disease onset.
  • Active RRMS (EDA) observed during the last 24 months: relapse and/or NELs and/or CELs as compared to a previous MRI performed within 24 months (± 3 months).
  • Current MET (IFN, GA, TE, fumarates) for less than 24 months.
  • Standard MRI follow-up scan performed less than 90 days before inclusion.
  • Clinically stable disease for at least 30 days.
  • Patients included in observational studies and cohorts (OFSEP, PROMISE …) will be eligible for inclusion in MoMo-NfL.
  • For women with reproductive potential: negative pregnancy test at the time of inclusion and use of an effective method to avoid pregnancy for the duration of the trial.
  • Patients able to adhere to the study visit schedule.
  • Patient must have signed and given the consent.
  • Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a health insurance plan.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
  • Patient unable to perform brain and/or spinal cord MRI scans.
  • Patient not willing to perform monthly blood punctures.
  • Patient treated with HET (S1P agonists, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, cladribine, mitoxantrone).
  • Patient with a relapse within 6 months before inclusion.
  • Patient with CELs within 3 months before inclusion.
  • Patient with progressive MS.
  • Patient unable to sign the consent.
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient.
  • Patient already participating in therapeutic research or in an exclusion period. The exclusion period corresponds to five half-lives (t1/2) of the experimental drug.
  • Patient under judicial protection, or is an adult under guardianship.
  • Female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding or of reproductive potential who are not willing to employ effective birth control for the duration of the trial.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Kein Eingriff: Standardpflege
Experimental: pNfL-Monitoring-Gruppe

Monthly pNfL monitoring from blood samples. In case of >50% pNfL increase as compared to the mean of the 2 previous measures, an unscheduled visit with brain and spinal cord MRI will be scheduled

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Time to evidence of disease activity between groups
Zeitfenster: week 48

As assessed by new relapse and/or occurrence of NELs and/or CELs on a follow-up MRI scan

week 48
Time to evidence of disease activity between groups
Zeitfenster: week 96

As assessed by new relapse and/or occurrence of NELs and/or CELs on a follow-up MRI scan

week 96

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Proportion of CELs between groups
Zeitfenster: week 48

percent of active (contrast-enhancing) lesion

week 48
Proportion of CELs between groups
Zeitfenster: week 96

percent of active (contrast-enhancing) lesion

week 96
Rate of clinical relapses between groups
Zeitfenster: week 48

percentage patients experiencing relapse

week 48
Rate of clinical relapses between groups
Zeitfenster: week 96

percentage patients experiencing relapse

week 96
Time to switch to high efficacy treatments
Zeitfenster: week 48

Days

week 48
Time to switch to high efficacy treatments
Zeitfenster: week 96

Days

week 96
Proportion of patients switching to high efficacy treatments between groups
Zeitfenster: week 48

Percentage

week 48
Proportion of patients switching to high efficacy treatments between groups
Zeitfenster: week 96

Percentage

week 96
Change in pNfL levels in patients experiencing relapse with active MRI in experimental group
Zeitfenster: Upon experiencing relapse (maximum week 96)

pg/mL; measured using Lumipulse® G NfL Blood

Upon experiencing relapse (maximum week 96)
Change in pNfL levels in patients experiencing acute clinical event in experimental group
Zeitfenster: Upon experiencing an acute clinical event (maximum week 96)

pg/mL; measured using Lumipulse® G NfL Blood

Upon experiencing an acute clinical event (maximum week 96)
Change in pNfL levels in patients experiencing radiological disease activity without clinical symptoms in experimental group
Zeitfenster: Upon experiencing radiological disease activity (maximum week 96)

pg/mL; measured using Lumipulse® G NfL Blood

Upon experiencing radiological disease activity (maximum week 96)
Change in pNfL levels in patients switching to high efficacy treatments
Zeitfenster: Upon evidence of disease activity (maximum week 96)

pg/mL; measured using Lumipulse® G NfL Blood

Upon evidence of disease activity (maximum week 96)

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
To estimate the best threshold of pNfL increase (last measure as compared to the mean of 2 previous measures) with best accuracy to detect evidence of disease activity
Zeitfenster: week 96

pNfL levels in pg/mL

week 96
Time to evidence of disease activity using optimized threshold in experimental group
Zeitfenster: week 96

Months

week 96
Correlation between basal pNfL fluctuations in patients with no evidence of disease activity and brain health questionnaire score
Zeitfenster: week 96

Brain-Q

week 96
Description of adverse events
Zeitfenster: week 96

Descriptive

week 96
Level of disability
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 0)

EDSS (Extanded Disability Status Scale) score, range: 0.0-10

Baseline (Day 0)
Level of disability
Zeitfenster: Week 48

EDSS (Extanded Disability Status Scale) score, range: 0.0-10

Week 48
Level of disability
Zeitfenster: week 96

EDSS (Extanded Disability Status Scale) score, range: 0.0-10

week 96
Information processing speed impairment
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 0)

CSCT (Computerized Speed Cognitive Test): score and standard deviation

Baseline (Day 0)
Information processing speed impairment
Zeitfenster: week 48

CSCT (Computerized Speed Cognitive Test): score and standard deviation

week 48
Information processing speed impairment
Zeitfenster: week 96

CSCT (Computerized Speed Cognitive Test): score and standard deviation

week 96
Manual dexterity
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 0)

NHPT (Nine Hole Peg Test): time (seconds)

Baseline (Day 0)
Manual dexterity
Zeitfenster: week 48

NHPT (Nine Hole Peg Test): time (seconds)

week 48
Manual dexterity
Zeitfenster: week 96

NHPT (Nine Hole Peg Test): time (seconds)

week 96
Walking function
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 0)

T25FW (Timed 25-Foot Walk); time (seconds)

Baseline (Day 0)
Walking function
Zeitfenster: week 48

T25FW (Timed 25-Foot Walk); time (seconds)

week 48
Walking function
Zeitfenster: week 96

T25FW (Timed 25-Foot Walk); time (seconds)

week 96
Patient-reported change in status
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 0)

PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change scale): score (7 points Likert scale)

Baseline (Day 0)
Patient-reported change in status
Zeitfenster: Week 48

PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change scale): score (7 points Likert scale)

Week 48
Patient-reported change in status
Zeitfenster: week 96

PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change scale): score (7 points Likert scale)

week 96
Patient-reported quality of life
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 0)

EQ-5D-5L score (0-100)

Baseline (Day 0)
Patient-reported quality of life
Zeitfenster: week 48

EQ-5D-5L score (0-100)

week 48
Patient-reported quality of life
Zeitfenster: week 96

EQ-5D-5L score (0-100)

week 96

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Eric Thouvenot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

12. Dezember 2025

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2030

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2030

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

5. Dezember 2025

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

5. Dezember 2025

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

18. Dezember 2025

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

3. November 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

2. November 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. November 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren