Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Enhancing Survivorship Care Planning for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Using A Couple-focused Web-based Tailored Symptom Self-management Program (SCP)

3 settembre 2020 aggiornato da: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

The purpose of this research study is to examine the feasibility of the enhanced survivorship care plans (ESCPs, regular SCPs with the a web-based couple-focused symptom self-management project (PERC) or National Cancer Institute prostate cancer web links) and to conduct an initial benefit assessment of enhanced survivorship care plans among prostate cancer patients transitioning from active treatment to post-treatment self-management, and their partners.

Participation of this study lasts for about for 16 weeks. Depending on participants' need for information, it takes 10-30 minutes of their time each week to review the information about prostate cancer.

Eligible and consented patients with newly treated localized prostate cancer and your partner (couples) are randomly assigned to the regular survivorship care plan (SCPs) with the NCI website or the enhanced survivorship care plans (SCP plus the web-based prostate cancer education program, PERC) groups. They complete baseline (T1, prior to randomization) and 4-month post-T1 follow-up measures (T2).

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Methods: A two-group randomized controlled pretest-posttest design will be used and collect data at baseline (T1) and 4 months later (T2) among 50 patients completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer and their partners. First, the investigators will assess the feasibility of ESCP by recruitment, enrollment, and retention rates, program satisfaction with the ESCP, and perceived ease of use of the ESCP. To achieve the secondary aim, the ESCP users will be compared with the standardized SCP users and assess their primary outcomes of QOL (overall, physical, emotional, and social QOL), secondary outcomes (reduction in negative appraisals and improvement in self-efficacy, social support, and health behaviors to manage symptoms), and number of visits to post-treatment care services at T1 and T2. The primary and secondary outcomes are assessed using measurements with sound psychometrical properties. The investigators will use a qualitative and quantitative mixed methods approach to achieve the research aims.

Conclusions: The results from this study will help design a definitive randomized trial to test the efficacy of the ESCPs, a potentially scalable program, to enhance supportive care for prostate cancer patients and their families.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

124

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Stati Uniti
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Stati Uniti, 27559
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 18 anni a 99 anni (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

Eligibility included men who:

  • were diagnosed with localized PC;
  • were within 16 weeks of completing their initial curative intent treatment [26] at genitourinary and radiation oncology clinics at two comprehensive cancer centers in the U.S southeast;
  • were not treated for another cancer in last year; and
  • had a partner > 18 years of age not receiving cancer treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Either member of couple unable to speak English
  • Unwilling/unable to provide Informed Consent

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Terapia di supporto
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore placebo: Survivorship Care Plan (SCP)
The SCP group (control) participants were directed to the National Cancer Institute PC website (NCI) (http://www.cancer.gov/types/prostate),
Altro: Survivorship Care Plan
Participants visit the NCI prostate cancer website in addition to their standardized post-treatment survivorship care
Sperimentale: Enhanced SCP (ESCP)
ESCP consists of the standard SCP that is enhanced by a couple-focused, tailored mHealth PC education program, the Patient Education Resources for Couples, to improve symptom management at home.
Altro: Enhanced Survivorship Care Plan
In addition to their standardized post-treatment survivorship care, participants visit the prostate cancer education resources for couples (PERC) website that was based on scientific evidence and input from stakeholders including PC patients, partners, and cancer care providers. Participants learn about skills and knowledge about how to enhance their positive appraisals of symptoms and self-efficacy in symptom management through information and skills training, fostering healthy behaviors, and facilitating social support

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Percentage of Potentially Eligible Participants Actually Enrolled Into the Study
Lasso di tempo: after participants completed baseline survey
Will evaluate the percentage of patients and partners successfully consented and completing the baseline survey among all people approached for the study
after participants completed baseline survey
Percentage of Participants Enrolled Who Remained in the Study and Completed the Post-Intervention Follow-Up Survey
Lasso di tempo: during 4-month study period
Will evaluate the percentage of participants successfully following protocol, defined as completing the Follow-Up survey at the end of the study period among those who have been enrolled into the study (who completed the baseline).
during 4-month study period
Percentage of Participants That Used the Web-Based Intervention Sessions That Are Consistent With Patient-Reported Symptoms
Lasso di tempo: during 4-month study period
The usage of Web-Based Intervention Sessions is determined by the percentage of participants who logged into the study website among those who have been randomly assigned to the intervention group. Patient-Reported Symptoms are determined by patient's responses on their appraisal of prostate cancer symptoms and general symptoms. 1=patient reported the symptom and the symptom webpage reviewed; 0=patient reported the symptom and no related webpage reviewed OR patient did not report the symptom but the webpage reviewed
during 4-month study period
Participant Satisfaction Scores
Lasso di tempo: at the 4 month followup
Program satisfaction determined by the 11-item Participant Satisfaction Scale measured the level of program satisfaction. The first to tenth items ranged from 1=not satisfied to 5=extremely satisfied. The eleventh item ranged from 1=extremely not to 4=definitely yes. Higher total score indicates greater program satisfaction
at the 4 month followup
Perceived Ease of Use Score
Lasso di tempo: at the 4 month followup
The 16-item Program Usability measures participants' assessment of their agreement with the ease of use of the program in terms of its general features, content, and navigation. The ranges of the total scores are (3,15), (4,20), (9,45) for general features, content, and navigation, respectively. The score of individual item ranges from1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Higher score indicates greater perceived ease of use.
at the 4 month followup

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in FACT-G Scores
Lasso di tempo: Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in QOL determined using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General Scale (FACT-G) v.4, a 27-item measure yielding total score and scores for physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being of demonstrated reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. FACT-G consists of 4 subscales: physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), emotional well-being (EWB) and social well-being (SWB). Scores on the four subscales are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 108 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value.
Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in Appraisal of Prostate Cancer-Specific Symptoms
Lasso di tempo: Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) is a comprehensive instrument designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment. EPIC will be used to measure change in appraisal of symptoms scores among patients from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1). EPIC contains 26 items within 5 domains: Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Irritative/Obstructive, Bowel, Sexual, and Hormonal. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing opposite results by role: patient with better appraisal of symptoms and partner with worse appraisal of symptoms. Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value.
Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in Appraisal of General Symptoms
Lasso di tempo: Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
The 19-item Risk for Distress-general symptoms is a subscale of the Risk for Distress Scale. It measures how much trouble the participant has with the general symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and etc. The total score ranges between 0 and 38, with higher scores indicating worse appraisal of symptoms. Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value.
Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Healthcare Utilization Extracted From Electronic Medical Record
Lasso di tempo: during the first 10 months after participants completed baseline survey
The total number of prostate cancer-related followup visits, emergency room use and readmissions.
during the first 10 months after participants completed baseline survey
Change in Self-Efficacy Scores From Baseline to 4-Months Post Baseline
Lasso di tempo: Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
The Lewis Cancer Self-Efficacy used to measure change in participants' feelings of self-efficacy in dealing with the patient's cancer diagnosis and treatment from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1). Participants rate statements about how confident they feel on a scale from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in PROMIS Social Support-Informational Support From Baseline to 4-Months Post-Baseline
Lasso di tempo: Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Informational Support Short Form 8a will be used to assess changes in patient and partner reported informational support system using a 5-point Likert scale from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1). The total score range: 8-40. Higher scores indicate more informational support. Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value.
Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in PROMIS Social Support-Emotional Support From Baseline to 4-months Post-Baseline
Lasso di tempo: Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
The PROMIS Emotional Support System-Short Form 8a will be used to assess changes in the self-reported emotional support system of patients and their partners using a 5-point Likert scale from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1). The total score range: 8-40. Higher scores indicate more emotional social support. Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value.
Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in PROMIS Social Support-Instrumental Support From Baseline to 4-months Post-Baseline
Lasso di tempo: Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
The PROMIS Instrumental Support-Short Form 8a will be used to assess changes in patient and partner reported instrumental support system using a 5-point Likert scale from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1). The total score range: 8-40. Higher scores indicate more instrumental support. Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value.
Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in Dietary Risk Assessment Scores From Baseline to 4-month Post Baseline as Measured by the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II
Lasso di tempo: Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in Dietary Risk Assessment scores used to measure changes in dietary risk from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1). Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value. Participants are asked how often they consume different foods over the past month or week and respond using a Likert Scale ranging from 1=never to 4=routinely. The total score range: 8-32. Higher scores indicate better health behaviors in nutrition.
Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in Physical Activity Assessment Scores From Baseline to 4-month Post Baseline as Measured by the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II
Lasso di tempo: Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4
Change in Physical Activity Assessment scores used to measure changes in physical activity from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1). Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value. Participants are asked how often they engage in exercises and physical activity over the past month or week and respond using a Likert Scale, ranging from 1=never to 4=routinely. The total score range: 9-36. Higher scores indicate better health behaviors in physical activity.
Baseline upon enrollment, Month 4

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Collaboratori

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

3 agosto 2017

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

30 novembre 2018

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

15 aprile 2019

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

28 marzo 2020

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

14 aprile 2020

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

17 aprile 2020

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

23 settembre 2020

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

3 settembre 2020

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2020

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • LCCC 1619
  • 1R21CA212516 (Sovvenzione/contratto NIH degli Stati Uniti)

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

SÌ

Descrizione del piano IPD

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Periodo di condivisione IPD

9 to 36 months following publication

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

Investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an IRB, IEC, or REB, as applicable, and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Cancro alla prostata

Prove cliniche su Survivorship Care Plan

Cerca prove simili

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

CROs by country

CROs in Ireland

Condizioni

Malattie rare

Interventi farmacologici

Supplementi dietetici

Sponsor / Collaboratori

Sedi

3
Sottoscrivi