Comparison of Nasal Steroids After FESS in CRSwNP

January 12, 2018 updated by: Yale University

A Comparison of Budesonide Nasal Irrigation in Different Head Positions and Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Post-operative Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis

The purpose of this study is to compare intranasal fluticasone spray with budesonide nasal saline rinses in both the upright and head forward positions in patients who have had functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and measure differences in Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scores and Lund- Kennedy scores on rigid nasal endoscopy at time points 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months post-op.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory condition of the lining of the nose and sinuses that lasts 12 weeks or longer with objective evidence of mucosal inflammation (1). CRSwNP is characterized by the presence of bilateral nasal polyps in the middle meatus. Patients with CRSwNP for whom medical therapy has failed, often have functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Nasal steroids are important post-operatively to prevent polyps from recurring. Many studies have shown that nasal steroids are superior to placebo in maintaining improvement in symptom scores, such as SNOT-22, post-operatively by preventing polyps from returning (2). Nasal steroids can reduce inflammation locally and can prevent disease relapse without the systemic effects of oral steroids. However, there is no consensus as to which nasal steroid and which delivery method is most effective in treating these patients. Traditional nasal sprays, such as fluticasone spray, may not deliver the medication widely in the nasal cavity. Budesonide is available in a respule form that can be used to instill the medication in the nose. In an attempt to more effectively deliver the medication, changes in patient's head position has been prescribed to achieve better delivery (3). The safety of intranasal budesonide, a more potent steroid than fluticasone, has been established (4, 5). However, any improved efficacy over fluticasone nasal spray remains anecdotal as head to head comparisons have not previously been performed.

Practice patterns among rhinologists in the post-operative prescription of nasal steroids vary widely. Determining which medication/delivery method is more effective will help rhinologists better treat their patients and prevent symptoms, for which the surgery was performed, from returning.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale Physicians Bldg
      • Stratford, Connecticut, United States, 06614
        • Yale ENT Stratford

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients who have had FESS for CRSwNP within the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are under the age of 18
  2. Concurrent oral corticosteroid use of the equivalent of greater than 10 mg of prednisone use per day
  3. The use of medications that accelerate the clearance of systemic cortisol (Dilantin, rifampin, amphetamines, and lithium)
  4. The use of medications that inhibit the clearance of systemic cortisol (ketoconazole, amphotericin B, bupropion, fluoroquinolones)
  5. Known hypersensitivity to corticosteroids
  6. A personal history of Wegener's Granulomatosis or other autoimmune disease with nasal manifestations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: fluticasone nasal spray
Group one will be prescribed fluticasone nasal spray ( to use 2-50 mcg sprays to each nostril two times per day)
use 2-50 mcg sprays to each nostril two times per day
Other Names:
  • Flonase
  • fluticasone propionate nasal
Active Comparator: budesonide respule in head upright
Group two will be prescribed budesonide respules (0.5 mg/2mL) to instill into each nostril in the upright position two times per day
(0.5 mg/2mL) to instill into each nostril in the upright position two times per day
Other Names:
  • budesonide
  • pulmicort respules
Active Comparator: budesonide head forward
Group three will be prescribed budesonide respules (0.5 mg/2mL) to use instill into each nostril in the head forward position two times per day with their head angled downwards by having their head lean forward off the side of a bed.
(0.5 mg/2mL) to instill into each nostril in the head forward position two times per day
Other Names:
  • budesonide
  • pulmicort respules

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SNOT-22 Scores
Time Frame: 6 months post-op.
SNOT22 is a validated scale which measures sinonasal symptoms for sinusitis patients. The 22 questions are rated on a scale of 0-5 for a maximum total score of 110. Higher scores represent more symptomatic patients.
6 months post-op.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lund-Kennedy Scoring for Nasal Endoscopy
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
The Lund Kennedy scoring system for nasal endoscopy rates the severity of the sinusitis based on the endoscopic appearance of the nasal mucosa. Edema, secretions and the presence of polyps are rated from 0-2, for a total maximum score of 6 per each side of the nose. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
6 months post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: R. Peter Manes, MD, Yale University School of Medicine, Asst Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sinusitis

Clinical Trials on fluticasone nasal spray

3
Subscribe