Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Lumbar Plexus Verses Periarticular

March 21, 2018 updated by: Rebecca L Johnson, MD, Mayo Clinic

Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Continuous Posterior Lumbar Plexus Nerve Block vs Periarticular Injection With Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel®) on Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty is a one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures with increasing numbers anticipated over the next several decades. The purpose of this study was to find a better way to make patients comfortable after their hip surgery. Three different ways of providing pain relief were compared, a peripheral nerve block in the lower back outside of the spinal space (using bupivacaine, a numbing medicine), or injections around the hip joint with one of two different medicines, either Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel®).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total hip arthroplasty is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain and an ideal clinical pathway for pain management has yet to be established. Multimodal pain management incorporating the use of regional anesthesia for THA has led to decreased hospital length of stay, improved patient comfort, and enhanced patient satisfaction that is efficacious and cost-effective. This investigation compared multimodal total joint arthroplasty pathways with continuous lumbar plexus blockade versus two different periarticular injection mixtures to potentially determine an ideal perioperative analgesia pathway for THA.

Patients undergoing elective, unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty within a clinical pathway utilizing preemptive low-dose opioid and non-opioid medications for multimodal analgesia were randomized to one of three different intervention groups after informed consent was obtained: posterior lumbar plexus block (PNB), periarticular infiltration (PAI) with ropivacaine, ketorolac, and epinephrine, and PAI with liposomal bupivacaine, ketorolac, and epinephrine. The investigators hypothesized differences in the analgesia outcomes between the three intervention groups would provide for an evidenced-based clinical pathway to emerge as a result of this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

165

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physiological status I-III
  2. Patients presenting for unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty
  3. Patients 18 years of age and older

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia or complex regional pain syndrome
  2. History of long term use of daily opioids (>1 months) with Oral Morphine Equivalent (OME) >5mg/day
  3. Body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2
  4. Allergies to medications used in this study such as: fentanyl,hydromorphone, ketorolac, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, local anesthetics, oxycodone, tramadol, ondansetron, droperidol, dexamethasone, celecoxib and OxyContin
  5. Major systemic medical problems such as:

    1. severe renal disorder defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <50 units/m2
    2. cardiovascular disorders defined as Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV
    3. severe hepatic disorder defined as current or past diagnosis of acute/subacute necrosis of liver, acute hepatic failure, chronic liver disease, cirrhosis (primary biliary cirrhosis), fatty liver, chronic hepatitis/toxic hepatitis, liver abscess, hepatic coma, hepatorenal syndrome, other disorders of liver
  6. Impaired cognitive function or inability to understand the study protocol
  7. Contraindication to a regional anesthesia technique (e.g., preexisting neuropathy in the operative extremity, coagulopathy [platelets < 100,000, International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5], refusal, etc.).
  8. Previous contralateral hip replacement managed with regional or periarticular injection
  9. Unable to follow-up at the 3 month interval at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota
  10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding (women of child-bearing potential will require a negative pregnancy test)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PNB Bupivacaine
Bupivacaine 0.5% with 1:200,000 epinephrine 30 ml bolus preoperatively followed by an infusion of bupivacaine 0.2% on post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival.
Infusion
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Injection, weight-based dosage of 100 mcg - 300 mcg
Active Comparator: PAI Ropivacaine
Patients 50 to 74.9 kg: ropivacaine 200 mg, epinephrine 100 ug, ketorolac 30 mg. Patients 75 to 99.9 kg: ropivacaine 300 mg, epinephrine 200 ug, ketorolac 30 mg. Patients 100 to 125 kg: ropivacaine 400 mg, epinephrine 300 ug, ketorolac 30mg.
Injection, weight-based dosage of 100 mcg - 300 mcg
Injection
Other Names:
  • Naropin
Injection, 30 mg
Other Names:
  • Acular
  • Acuvail
Active Comparator: PAI liposomal bupivacaine
Liposomal bupivacaine 255 mg, ketorolac 30 mg, bupivacaine 125 mg, epinephrine 125 ug.
Injection, weight-based dosage of 100 mcg - 300 mcg
Injection, 30 mg
Other Names:
  • Acular
  • Acuvail
Injection
Other Names:
  • Exparel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Postoperative Pain Score
Time Frame: Post-Operative Day 1 (0600-1200)
Pain was measured on an ascending numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0-10 where 1-3 equaled mild pain, 4-6 equaled moderate pain, 7-9 equaled severe pain, and 10 equaled worst possible pain.
Post-Operative Day 1 (0600-1200)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Opioid Consumption During Hospitalization
Time Frame: Preoperative, Intraoperative, Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU), Post Operative Day (POD) 0, day 1, and day 2
Measured in daily oral morphine equivalents (OME)
Preoperative, Intraoperative, Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU), Post Operative Day (POD) 0, day 1, and day 2

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: Post-operative Day 1 through discharge (approximately 3 days)
Discharge readiness was evaluated by the surgical team during morning and afternoon physical therapy sessions.
Post-operative Day 1 through discharge (approximately 3 days)
Change in Unipedal Stance Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Length of time in seconds a patient could stand on involved leg
Baseline, 3 months
Post-Operative Pain Score
Time Frame: 3 month follow-up
Pain intensity (NRS) assessment at 3 month follow-up. Pain was measured on an ascending numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0-10 where 1-3 equaled mild pain, 4-6 equaled moderate pain, 7-9 equaled severe pain, and 10 equaled worst possible pain.
3 month follow-up
Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Physical Component
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36). Subjects completed the SF-36 which consists of 8 sub-scales ranging from 0 to 100, with (0 = worst imaginable, 100 = best imaginable).
Baseline, 3 months
Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Mental Component
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36). Subjects completed the SF-36 which consists of 8 sub-scales ranging from 0 to 100, with (0 = worst imaginable, 100 = best imaginable).
Baseline, 3 months
Number of Participants Reporting Complications Since Surgery
Time Frame: Post-operative Day 1 Through 3 - Month Follow-up
Complications were collected by telephone interview after surgery.
Post-operative Day 1 Through 3 - Month Follow-up
Number of Participants Reporting a NRS Pain Score Greater Than 3
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
Pain was measured on an ascending numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0-10 where 1-3 equaled mild pain, 4-6 equaled moderate pain, 7-9 equaled severe pain, and 10 equaled worst possible pain.
3 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Johnson, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on PNB Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe