Pathological Complete Response Rate in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer With FEC, EC-T, or TC as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

November 18, 2017 updated by: Zhiyong Yu

Pathological Complete Response Rate in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer With Neoadjuvant Fluorourcil/Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel, or Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become the standard therapy for both locally advanced and early-stage breast cancer in recent years for the improvement breast conserving surgery rate and the evaluation of treatment response in vivo. Pathological complete response (pCR) is an independent prognostic factor irrespective of breast cancer intrinsic subtypes after NAC. The trial is designed to compare effectiveness between anthracycline and/or taxane as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable advanced breast cancer in different molecular typing. In this trial the investigators will randomly assign 200 primary breast cancer patients to receive six cycles of fluorourcil, epirubicin,and cyclophosphamide(FEC), or four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by four cycles of docetaxel(T), or six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC). Trasuzumab was recommended combining docetaxel to patients if HER-2 positive.The effectiveness of therapy will be estimated after every two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery will be performed after completing designated full cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is to assess pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/is ypN0) rate in different regiments. The secondary endpoint is to assess the relationship between pCR rate with molecular typing in different regiments, so that the investigators could optimize neoadjuvant chemotherapy regiment according to molecular typing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The trial is designed to compare effectiveness between anthracycline and/or taxane as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable advanced breast cancer in different molecular typing. In this trial the investigators will randomly assign 200 primary breast cancer patients to receive six cycles of fluorourcil, epirubicin,and cyclophosphamide(FEC), or four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by four cycles of docetaxel(T), or six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC). Trasuzumab was recommended combining docetaxel to patients if HER-2 positive.The effectiveness of therapy will be estimated after every two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery will be performed after completing designated full cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is to assess pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/is ypN0) rate in different regiments. The secondary endpoint is to assess the relationship between pCR rate with molecular typing in different regiments, so that the investigators could optimize neoadjuvant chemotherapy regiment according to molecular typing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients were required to give written informed consent.
  • Patients present with operable breast cancers that were diagnosed by histopathology and have no distant metastasis.
  • Have no history of anti-cancer therapies including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy and surgical therapy.
  • Have normal cardiac functions by echocardiography.
  • ECOG scores are ≤ 0-1.
  • Patients are disposed to practice contraception during the whole trial.
  • The results of patients' blood tests are as follows:

Hb ≥ 90 g/L WBC ≥ 3.0×109/L Plt ≥ 100×109/L Neutrophils ≥ 1.5×109/L ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 times of normal upper limit. TBIL ≤ 1.5 times of normal upper limit. Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times of normal upper limit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have other cancers at the same time or have the history of other cancers in recent five years, excluding the controlled skin basal cell carcinoma or skin squamous cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of cervix.
  • Active infections
  • Severe non-cancerous diseases.
  • The patients are undergoing current administration of anti-cancer therapies, or are attending some other clinical trails.
  • Inflammatory breast cancer.
  • Pregnant or lactational, or patients refuse to practice contraception during the whole trial.
  • The patients are in some special conditions that they can't understand the written informed consent, such as they are demented or hawkish.
  • Have allergic history of the chemotherapeutic agents.
  • Bilateral breast cancers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: FEC group
Fluorouracil 500mg/m2 on day 1, epirubicin 100mg/m2 on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks for six cycles
100mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Adriacin
500mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Fluorouracil injection
500mg/m2(FEC), 600mg/m2(EC-T and TC)
Other Names:
  • Cyclophosphamide injection
EXPERIMENTAL: EC-T group
Epirubicin 100mg/m2 on day 1 cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 on day1 every 2 weeks for four cycles followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks for four cycles
100mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Adriacin
75mg/m2(TC), 100mg/m2(EC-T)
Other Names:
  • Docetaxel injection
500mg/m2(FEC), 600mg/m2(EC-T and TC)
Other Names:
  • Cyclophosphamide injection
EXPERIMENTAL: TC group
Docetaxel 75mg/m2 on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks for six cycles
75mg/m2(TC), 100mg/m2(EC-T)
Other Names:
  • Docetaxel injection
500mg/m2(FEC), 600mg/m2(EC-T and TC)
Other Names:
  • Cyclophosphamide injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR)
Time Frame: 2 years
Participants were evaluated following eight cycles of treatment and after surgery to assess for pCR. pCR was defined as no invasive or in situ residual tumor masses in the breast and lymph nodes according to pathologist examination. The percentage of participants with pCR was reported, and the 95% CI for one-sample binomial was constructed using the Pearson-Clopper method.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The relation between pCR rate, molecular subtypes, and different regiments.
Time Frame: 2 years
The correlations were calculated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The criteria for judging the size of the correlation coefficient were applied: correlations<0.30 are considered minor, correlations between 0.3-0.49 are considered medium, and ≥0.5 are considered strong. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to determine inter-examiner agreement. According to Altman's guidelines, it is poor when kappa scores ≤0.20, fair when kappa between 0.21-0.40, moderate when kappa between 0.41-0.60, good when kappa 0.61-0.80, and very good when kappa ≥0.80.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiaoshan Cao, MD, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

November 27, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 27, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Epirubicin

3
Subscribe