- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05440968
Comparative Effectiveness of POC-A1c vs the Current Standard Based on OGTT for Early Detection DM2 in Colombia (EDDIT-1)
Comparative Effectiveness of Point-of-care Glycosylated Hemoglobin Measurement (POC-A1c) vs the Current Standard Based on Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Early Detection of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2) in Colombia
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The physician explains the study´s consistency and obtains informed consent. If the patient accepts, the FINDRISC will be checked, the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be verified and the pertinent data from the patient's medical history will be recorded in a computer.
Subsequently, subjects will be included in the study and randomized into two groups. In group A (intervention) participants will be offered information on healthy lifestyles according to their score on the FINDRISC questionnaire and subsequently a POC-A1c measurement. Participants in group B (control) will be offered the same information on healthy lifestyles according to their FINDRISC score.
Additionally, all randomized participants will be invited to undergo an oral glucose tolerance test in the CAIMED allied laboratory or in the laboratory of their choice or through their health care provider with the necessary preparation recommendations for the performance of the test. For this purpose, they will be given an order that includes the date of the screening, a follow-up number and a window of time in which they should go (i.e., 30 days and with a second attempt - maximum window at 90 days).
After 30 days from the application of the screening from the delivery of the order for the OGTT, a call will be made to the randomized subjects to check the result of the OGTT if the test was taken and request its result in case it was taken, if the test was taken, it should refer the same to the center. Otherwise, the causes of loss to follow-up will be inquired not having previously performed the recommended OGTTand a new call will be made at 90 days. In patients who, if they attended the OGTT and obtained a presumptive result of diabetes (defined as an altered oral glucose tolerance test and/or altered POC - A1C test according to American Diabetes Association guidelines), a close call will be made 30 days after the test was performed to confirm whether they initiated control of their disease. For this, it will be indicated to them that they must attend a consultation by general medicine according to what is contemplated by their benefit plan administration entity, social security administrator, giving completion to the follow-up.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bogotá, Colombia, 111631
- Maria Granados
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult, aged greater than or equal to 18 years and less than or equal to 75 years.
- Understands, accepts and agrees to sign the informed consent form.
- FINDRISC greater than or equal to 12
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding at the time of inclusion in the study (referred by the subject).
- History of cancer in the subject (must be in remission for 5 years).
- Known history of familiar hyperlipidemia.
- Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids (Defined as: a dose greater than 5 mg of oral prednisolone or its equivalent and/or consumption greater than one month of the same).
- Known history of hemophilia or other coagulation disorders.
- Known history of stage IV or V chronic kidney disease.
- Known history of HIV (on antiretroviral therapy).
- History of sickle cell disease
- Known history of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
- Known history of blood transfusion in the last 3 months
- Known history of erythropoietin therapy in the last 6 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: A - Intervention
A - After randomization, participants will be offered information on healthy lifestyles according to their score on the FINDRISC questionnaire and subsequently a POC-A1c measurement + a confirmatory test order (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test)
|
Test for diagnosis of Diabetes through a Point of care device
Routinary diagnosis diabetes test by venous blood sample
|
Other: B - Control
B - After randomization, will be offered the same information on healthy lifestyles according to their FINDRISC score, and will receive an order to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test.
|
Routinary diagnosis diabetes test by venous blood sample
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Attendance of patients with knowledge of their risk for diabetes type 2 to a confirmatory test, oral glucose tolerance test
Time Frame: up to 90 days
|
Through follow up calls and report of oral glucose tolerance test, compare the attendance arm who had Point of care of A1C with the one who didn´t
|
up to 90 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
number of patients attending the confirmatory testing as adherence to their primary care physician's recommendations and clinical practice guidelines
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days
|
Through follow up calls and report of oral glucose tolerance test, in a window stablished by 30 and 90 days.
Compare the attendace arm who had Point of care of Hb1Ac with the one who didn´t
|
30 and 90 days
|
Describe the causes of non-performance of the confirmatory test throughout a brief questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 90 days
|
Identification of predictors of non-performance or postponement of the diagnostic test within a maximum of 90 days from the initial recommendation.
|
up to 90 days
|
Number of days that determine the application of POC-A1c compared to the current recommendations from the American Academy of Diabetes (OGTT).
Time Frame: 30 to 90 days
|
Through follow up calls and report of oral glucose tolerance test, compare the attendance arm who had Point of care of Hb1Ac with the one who didn´t
|
30 to 90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Humberto Reynales, MD MSc PhD, Physician
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Al Kaabi J. Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes - Global Burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020 Mar;10(1):107-111. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001.
- Khunti K, Gavin JR 3rd, Boulton AJM, Blickstead R, McGill M, Ceriello A, Raz I, Sadikot S, Wood DA, Cos X, Kalra S, Das AK, Espinosa Lopez C; Berlin Declaration Steering Group. The Berlin Declaration: A call to improve early actions related to type 2 diabetes. Why is primary care important? Prim Care Diabetes. 2018 Oct;12(5):383-392. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 May 8.
- American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes. 2022 Jan;40(1):10-38. doi: 10.2337/cd22-as01. No abstract available.
- Vandersmissen GJ, Godderis L. Evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) for diabetes screening in occupational health care. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28(3):587-91. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00407.
- Barry E, Roberts S, Oke J, Vijayaraghavan S, Normansell R, Greenhalgh T. Efficacy and effectiveness of screen and treat policies in prevention of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of screening tests and interventions. BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6538. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6538.
- Barengo NC, Tuomilehto JO. How can we identify candidates at highest risk--to screen or not to screen? Herz. 2016 May;41(3):175-83. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4417-5.
- Jani IV, Peter TF. How point-of-care testing could drive innovation in global health. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 13;368(24):2319-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1214197. No abstract available.
- 8. Mariano Cantillo HJ, Ocampo DF, Cuello Santana KL. Uso del instrumento FINDRISK para identificar el riesgo de prediabetes y diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Revista Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugía. 2019 Oct 25;28(3):157-63.
- Barengo NC, Tamayo DC, Tono T, Tuomilehto J. A Colombian diabetes risk score for detecting undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose regulation. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Feb;11(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Glucose Metabolism Disorders
- Metabolic Diseases
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Antirheumatic Agents
- Chrysarobin
Other Study ID Numbers
- CGIS-DM-001-18
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
-
SanofiCompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes MellitusHungary, Russian Federation, Germany, Poland, Japan, United States, Finland
-
Mannkind CorporationTerminatedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 1 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityBoehringer IngelheimCompletedDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 (T2DM)Germany
-
Scripps Whittier Diabetes InstituteSan Diego State UniversityCompletedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)United States
-
University Hospital Inselspital, BerneCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusSwitzerland
-
India Diabetes Research Foundation & Dr. A. Ramachandran...CompletedTYpe 2 Diabetes MellitusIndia
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsAmerican Diabetes AssociationCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Dexa Medica GroupCompletedType-2 Diabetes MellitusIndonesia
-
Griffin HospitalCalifornia Walnut CommissionCompletedDIABETES MELLITUS TYPE 2United States
-
Diabetes Foundation, IndiaNational Diabetes Obesity and Cholesterol FoundationRecruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus With ComplicationIndia
Clinical Trials on Point of Care - Glycated Hemoglobin (A1c)
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedPregnant | PostpartumUnited States
-
University of NebraskaNational Cancer Institute (NCI); VA Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System; Virginia Mason Hospital/Medical CenterRecruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | PreDiabetes | Genetic Predisposition to Disease | Chronic Pancreatitis | Inherited Disease | Pancreas CystUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaVancouver General HospitalUnknown
-
Goethe UniversityUniversity Hospital, EssenCompletedCardiac Surgery | Coagulation ManagementGermany
-
Temple UniversityCompleted
-
Medical University of ViennaWithdrawnTelemedicine | EchocardiographyAustria
-
University College, LondonRecruiting
-
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research...RecruitingLactate Blood Increase | Severe Sepsis With Septic ShockBangladesh
-
WellSpan HealthStony Brook University; University of California, IrvineRecruitingPulmonary EmbolismUnited States