Remote Monitoring After Heart Failure

September 25, 2025 updated by: Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

Individually Tailored Remote Monitoring at Home After Hospitalisation for HEART Failure in Multi-morbid Patients (IT-HEART): a Randomised Clinical Trial

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalisation and disability-adjusted life years lost, with mortality rates exceeding most cancers. Despite compelling evidence and recommendations, less than 20% of the HF patients are followed-up by the specialist healthcare after hospital discharge. Due to limited outpatient capacity, human resources and increasing incidence of HF over the next decades, new care models are obviously needed. Remote monitoring (i.e. telemonitoring) encompasses the use of audio, video and other telecommunication technologies to monitor patient status at a distance. Remote monitoring is a promising strategy that can facilitate rapid access to care when needed and reduce patient travel to hospital consultations. It also promotes self-care behaviour, psychosocial support, and early detection of cardiac decompensation. Despite intensive research for >10 years, randomised trials show conflicting results, and European HF guidelines are confined to a weak (class IIb, level of evidence B) recommendation. More knowledge about the role of remote monitoring strategies in HF management, especially in the transition from hospital to home, is thus requested in the most recent European and US guidelines. In particular, studies of high-risk patients integrating the community health services are largely lacking. Furthermore, the components of the intervention that mediate the effect need to be identified. The proposed study aims to address these gaps in evidence and assess whether individually tailored remote monitoring at home (IT-HEART) is improves clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with decompensated HF. We also aim to identify modifiable clinical and behavioural (drug adherence, self-care, psychological factors) outcome predictors. A prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint adjudication (PROBE) intervention study is designed and powered to include at least 200 patients with at least one HF hospitalization in the 12 months preceding enrolment. To ensure generalizability, patients will be included regardless of comorbidity, frailty and ejection fraction. We have conducted a pilot-study providing empirical evidence for the expected participation rate, readmission rate and barriers to HF management in current clinical practice that will be targets for the intervention. This will promote high adherence to the intervention and positive long-term clinical and health economic effects.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lørenskog, Norway
        • Akershus University Hospital
    • Vestfold and Telemark County
      • Tønsberg, Vestfold and Telemark County, Norway, 3103
        • Vestfold Hospital Trust
    • Viken County
      • Drammen, Viken County, Norway, 3004
        • Vestre Viken Trust Drammen hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age> 18 years
  • Known HF diagnosis (ICD-10: I50) recorded in hospital medical records
  • Admitted to hospital within 7 days before screening for acute HF with symptoms of decompensation including dyspnoea in NYHA class ≥ II, pulmonary congestion on chest x-ray and/or other signs like oedema or positive rales on auscultation and elevated NT-proBNP concentrations at screening
  • Sign informed consent and expected to participate according to ICH / GCP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition (e.g. psychosis, alcohol abuse, dementia) or situation that may pose a significant risk to the participant, confuse the results or make participation unethical
  • Not able to understand Norwegian language
  • Short life expectancy (<6 months) due to non-cardiac causes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Remote monitoring program
Symptoms of disease progression, clinical parameters, medication adherence and follow-up needs will be reported by patients or with support from relatives or homecare nurses 2-4 times/months over a three months period using a digital platform. Telephone monitoring is planned for patients who are not able to comply with the digital platform. In addition, an individualized self-treatment plan for diuretics and lifestyle advice will be prepared, preferably together with relatives at the outpatient clinic. Participants will also have access to a website with written information and videos about HF and self-management. Finally, a pillbox will be delivered to facilitate drug adherence.
Active Comparator: Usual care
Current clinical pratice at the participating hospitals
Usual care treatment and follow-up care at the outpatient clinic and in primary care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of re-hospitalizations for heart failure
Time Frame: From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Rate of re-hospitalizations for heart failure at 12 months follow-up assessed from hospital medical records between the treatment arms
From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Time to first re-hospitalization for heart failure
Time Frame: From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Time to first re-hospitalization for heart failure at 12 months follow-up assessed from hospital medical records between the treatment arms
From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of total death
Time Frame: From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Rate of total death at 12 months follow-up assessed from hospital medical records between the treatment arms
From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Changes in selfcare behaviour
Time Frame: From baseline until three months follow-up
Changes in selfcare behaviour measured by the revised 9-item European Heart Failure Selfcare behaviour Scale assessed by patient self-report on a five-point scale from "totally agree" to "totally disagree".
From baseline until three months follow-up
Rate of unplanned re-hospitalizations
Time Frame: From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Rate of re-hospitalizations at 12 months follow-up assessed from hospital medical records between the treatment arms
From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Total number of days lost due to unplanned heart failure admissions treatment arms
Time Frame: From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Percentage of days lost due to unplanned heart failure admissions at 12 months follow-up between the treatment arms assessed from hospital medical records
From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Total number of days lost due to unplanned hospital admissions treatment arms
Time Frame: From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Percentage of days lost due to unplanned hospital admissions at 12 months follow-up between the treatment arms assessed from hospital medical records
From time of randomization until 12 months follow-up
Changes in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: From baseline until three months follow-up
Changes in health-related quality of life measured by Kansas Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire 12-score (higher scores indicating better outcome).
From baseline until three months follow-up
Changes in symptom score and patient satisfaction
Time Frame: From baseline until three months follow-up
Changes in symptom score and patient satisfaction measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised scores (higher scores indicating better outcome).
From baseline until three months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 464460

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nurse's Role

Clinical Trials on Nurse-led remote monitoring program

Subscribe