Platform Adaptive Embedded Trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PETARDS)

Platform adaptive embedded trial for acute respiratory distress syndrome (PETARDS) is a randomized, embedded, multifactorial, adaptive platform trial for ARDS. The study aimed to assess the impact of multiple interventions on outcomes in patients with ARDS admitted to the ICU.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Mortality is significantly higher in ARDS patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

ARDS patients admitted to the ICU typically receive multiple (as many as 10 or 20) treatments that work together to fight infection, reduce pulmonary exudation, improve oxygenation, and support systemic organ function. Clinicians are often willing to choose the exact or considered safe and effective regimen from the therapies mentioned above. Still, there are individual differences in ARDS patients, and it is difficult to confirm the optimal treatment plan. It is inevitable to choose treatment without evidence-based medicine based on experience. The primary purpose of this study was to help physicians select the best-effective approach among existing ARDS therapies, and secondly to provide a rationale for specific empirical or emerging ARDS treatments.

Clinical evidence to guide optimal management is best obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, ARDS is a multi-causal, clinically and therapeutically heterogeneous clinical syndrome with rapid disease progression and complex clinical manifestations, in fact, difficult to organize RCT trials. In cases where the timing of onset and the pathophysiological mechanism cannot be determined, the initial treatment is the selection of protective ventilation/controlled infusion as the first-line standard therapy according to the Berlin classification of ARDS, and some second-line treatments with potential clinical benefit. It is difficult to conduct objective, scientific and timely evaluation, and the overall treatment plan is inevitably blind and empirical. This clinical operation mode is likely related to ARDS-related RCT research results. The results are unsatisfactory, the treatment response heterogeneity is high, and the outcome events vary greatly. closely related to the clinical status. The adaptive platform trial PETARDS is ideal for evaluating the effects of highly heterogeneous ARDS treatment strategies.

This clinical research design (adaptive platform trial, APT) can use the information of patients who are participating in the study to guide the clinical treatment of subsequent newly enrolled patients.

The APT trial randomized patients into multiple domains for multiple interventions to assess their effectiveness in different patients. The term "domain" refers to a common treatment unit (eg, steroid therapy) within which patients can be randomly assigned to several interventional (dose) groups (including controls, such as no steroids, as appropriate). Certainly). All trial procedures consist of a primary or "core" protocol and multiple secondary protocols, and the standard protocols, clinical treatment adaptations, and trial management and practices for specific treatment units are managed in a unified manner for each treatment unit. The core protocol, secondary protocols, and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) of this trial are presented in the appendix; the study required approval from the relevant ethics committees of all participating hospitals and was conducted by good clinical practice guidelines and principles described in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
        • Contact:
          • yecheng liu
      • Chengdu, China
        • Recruiting
        • West China Hospital,Sichuan University
        • Contact:
          • shu zhang
      • Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • yiyu deng
      • Harbin, China
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Junbo Zheng
      • Lanxi, China
        • Recruiting
        • Lanxi People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • jiancheng ducheng
      • Ningbo, China
        • Recruiting
        • Ningbo First Hospital
        • Contact:
          • heng fan
      • Shanghai, China
        • Recruiting
        • Zhognshang hospital, Fudan University
        • Contact:
          • zhenju songzhen
      • Taizhou, China
        • Recruiting
        • Taizhou Hosptial of Zhejiang Province
        • Contact:
          • Sheng Zhang
      • Wuhan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:
          • yujing zhang
      • Wuhan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Wuhan University Renmin Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Lu Wang
      • Zhengzhou, China
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
        • Contact:
          • chao lan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adult patients (18 years and older, regardless of gender) admitted to the ICU with ARDS; Intubation and mechanical ventilation; Moderate/severe ARDS defined by Berlin criteria (PaO2/FiO2 ≤200mmHg, PEEP ≥5cmH20); Moderate/severe ARDS less than 48 hours before randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancy or breastfeeding; Known allergy to the intervention drug; Daily use of an intervention drug or measure within the past 15 days; Intervention drugs or measures primarily intended to treat other conditions (eg, septic shock); Patients using the intervention drug or standard for two or more days during hospitalization; Patients are expected to die within the next 24 hours; Other: Participated in PETARDS in the past 90 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: protective ventilation
For ARDS patients with moderate to severe mechanical ventilation(MAQUET), give 6-8ml/kg (ideal body weight PBW), and control the plateau pressure to <30cmH2O; In patients with respiratory distress, the tidal volume can be increased to 7-8ml/kg (PBW), while the plateau pressure is <30cmH2O. Adjust breathing rate according to CO2 level, up to 35 breaths/min. PBW, male: 50+0.91 (height cm-152.4); female: 45.5+0.91 (height cm-152.4).
Patients with moderate to severe ARDS received ventilation treatment according to predicted body weight(PBW) and controlled plateau pressure.
Experimental: prone position ventilation (including awake state)
For patients with moderate to severe ARDS who have no contraindications to prone ventilation, protective lung ventilation is given and prone ventilation is performed; the duration is more than 12 hours/time.
patients with moderate to severe ARDS who don't have contraindications were given prone ventilation for over 12 hours.
Experimental: glucocorticoid therapy
Glucocorticoids are used for ARDS patients, with small doses and short courses of treatment in the acute phase (within 14 days). There is no clear recommendation for patients with ARDS from other causes. At present, the main research methods are methylprednisolone program(Solu-Medrol®), dexamethasone program, and hydrocortisone program

Dexamethasone: Patients received intravenous dexamethasone 20 mg daily from days 1 to 5, reduced to 10 mg daily from days 6 to 10.

Hydrocortisone:For septic ARDS patients, 50 mg of hydrocortisone was given as an intravenous bolus every 6 hours for 7 days; For patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, The corticosteroid field randomized participants to a fixed 7-day period of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg or 100 mg every 6 hours).

Other Names:
  • Dexamethasone
  • Hydrocortisone
Experimental: restrictive fluid resuscitation
ARDS patients with circulatory or organ hypoperfusion problems should use as little fluid as possible to maintain treatment and circulation; other ARDS patients should focus on stabilizing circulation during the resuscitation phase, with controlled fluid replacement combined with early vasoactive drugs; ultrasound, Central venous pressure measurement, mixed central venous oxygen saturation, alveolar-arterial oxygen difference, blood lactate, etc. guide fluid resuscitation therapy; stop using vasoactive drugs for more than 12 hours, and use diuretics or diuretics combined with albumin to achieve fluid balance.
  1. without other organ dysfunction patients: Minimize fluid was given;
  2. other ARDS patients: In the resuscitation phase, controlled fluid replacement combined with vasoactive drugs was given; multiple measures were taken, like lactate and so on, to utilizedto guide fluid resuscitation therapy; diuretics or diuretics in combination with albumin to achieve fluid balance.
Experimental: Immunomodulatory therapy
Thymosin Alpha(Thymalfasin for Injection) 1.6mg subcutaneously twice a week.
People received thymosin Alpha subcutaneous injections, twice a week.
Experimental: Muscle relaxant therapy
For patients with moderate to severe ARDS, if light sedation cannot achieve protective lung ventilation strategy and prone position ventilation, deep sedation combined with intermittent bolus injection of muscle relaxants(Vecuronium Bromide for Injection) is used; if protective lung ventilation strategy and prone position ventilation still cannot be achieved, deep sedation combined with continuous Inject muscle relaxants.
Deep sedation combined with intermittent bolus injection of muscle relaxant or deep sedation combined with continuous infusion of muscle relaxant
Other Names:
  • Succinylcholine
  • Vecuronium Bromide
Experimental: Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Treatment
Mechanical ventilation + conventional western medicine + Dachengqi Decoction/Rhubarb-Salvia Injection/Tanreqing/Xuanbai Chengqi Decoction(Drugs determined by syndrome differentiation and treatment)
  1. ventilation;
  2. conventional western medicine treatment;
  3. Chinese herbal medicine(Determining medication based on syndrome differentiation)
Experimental: statin therapy
There are currently two options: 1) Simvastatin (Simvastatin Tablets)80 mg QD orally for up to 28 days in patients with acute lung injury. 2) Rosuvastatin (Rosuvastatin Calcium Tablets)40 mg for the first time, followed by 20 mg orally daily for 28 days, or 3 days after being transferred out of the ICU, or after the patient died.
  1. Simvastatin: 80mg qd po for not more than 28days;
  2. Rosuvastatin: 20mg qd po (40mg for the first time) for 28days or 3 days after transfer out of the ICU, or the patient died.
Other Names:
  • Rosuvastatin
  • Simvastatin
Experimental: anti-infective treatment
Refer to the "Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021." recommendations.
According to "Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021".
Experimental: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation(ECMO)
ECMO (Medtronic) is chosen as rescue therapy for severe ARDS patients with refractory hypoxemia within 7 days of onset. (Oxygenation index < 50 mmHg for 3 hours, or oxygenation index < 80 mmHg for 6 hours, or arterial pH < 7.25, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide [Paco2] ≥ 60 mmHg > 6 hours, and respiratory rate increased to every minute 35 breaths, adjusting mechanical ventilation settings to maintain plateau pressure ≤32 cmH2O) despite ventilator optimization (defined as inspired oxygen concentration) ≥ 0.80, tidal volume 6 ml/kg (PBW), and positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] ≥ 10 cmH2O). V-V mode is preferred.
  1. For severe ARDS patients with refractory hypoxemia within 7 days of onset;
  2. (Inspiratory oxygen concentration) ≥ 0.80, tidal volume 6ml/kg (PBW), positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] ≥ 10 cmH2O;
  3. V-V Model.
Experimental: stem cell therapy
Previous clinical studies have found that stem cell therapy is safe, using a single injection of bone marrow stem cells at a dose of 1, 5, 10*106 cells/kg; START trial, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02097641, for patients with moderate to severe ARDS, a single intravenous injection of bone marrow stem cells 10* 106 cells/kg intervention protocol.
A single injection of bone marrow stem cells, doses of 1, 5, 10*106 cells/kg was taken according to the previous clinical studies.
Experimental: Sedative analgesia/muscle relaxant therapy
For patients with moderate to severe ARDS, if light sedation cannot achieve protective lung ventilation strategy and prone position ventilation, deep sedation(Propofol Injectable Emulsion or Midazolam Injection) combined with intermittent bolus injection of muscle relaxants is used; if protective lung ventilation strategy and prone position ventilation still cannot be achieved, deep sedation combined with continuous Inject muscle relaxants(Vecuronium Bromide for Injection).
Deep sedation combined with intermittent bolus injection of muscle relaxant or deep sedation combined with continuous infusion of muscle relaxant
Other Names:
  • midazolam
  • dexmedetomidine
  • Propofol
Experimental: inotropes therapy
For unconventional medication, according to"Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for the management of sepsis and septic shock 2021".
According to "Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021".
Other Names:
  • Dopamine
  • Olprinone
  • Levosimendan
Experimental: Vasoactive drug therapy
According to"Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021".
According to "Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021".
Other Names:
  • Norepinephrine
  • epinephrine
  • metaraminol
  • isoproterenol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ventilator-free days
Time Frame: within 28 days
Ventilator-free days 28 days after randomization, definition: Survival without mechanical ventilation
within 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical status assessment
Time Frame: 15 days
Patients' clinical status (6-point scale score) was assessed on day 15 after randomization, Definition: This scale ranges from 1 (no hospitalization) to 6 (death), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
15 days
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: within 28 days
All-cause mortality 28 days after randomization
within 28 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: within 28 days
days of mechanical ventilation
within 28 days
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
Time Frame: at 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after randomization
SOFA Score for different times, from 0 to 24 points
at 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after randomization
ICU stay time
Time Frame: within 90 days
The time for patients staying in ICU when they were in the hospital.
within 90 days
Hospital stay
Time Frame: within 90 days
The whole time patients lived in the hospital, including the time when they lived in the ICU
within 90 days
Organ failure free days
Time Frame: within 28 days
Patients got ARDS, but the other organs were not injury.
within 28 days
Health-related quality of life assessment, EQ5D-5L and WHODAS 2.0
Time Frame: within 6 months
Patient's life quality was assessed according to EQ5D-5L. If the patient had severe impairment of organ function within 6 months, evaluated the patient's quality of life according to WHODAS 2.0
within 6 months
Proportion of intubated patients undergoing tracheostomy
Time Frame: 28 days
ARDS patients received tracheostomy.
28 days
Where the patient went after discharge
Time Frame: No recurrence within 90 days
Home, rehabilitation hospital, nursing home or long-term care facility, or other emergency hospital
No recurrence within 90 days
Re-admission to ICU during readmission
Time Frame: within 90 days
Patients were sent to the hospital and sent to the ICU again,
within 90 days
Days not in intensive care unit
Time Frame: 28 days after randomization
ICU transfer and discharge 28 days after randomization
28 days after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-0770

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

  1. all collected IPD;
  2. all IPD that underlie results in a publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be permanently available after the publication of this study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available to all upon publication of this study. Applicants can contact the corresponding author to apply, but they must provide the reasons for the application, the purpose of the research, and the ethical certificates of the relevant research.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on protective ventilation

3
Subscribe