High Dose Vitamin D Supplementation in Children With Sickle Cell Disease

February 21, 2024 updated by: Diana Hanna Abdelmalek Hanna, Zagazig University

Safety and Efficacy of Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D3 Supplementation in Children and Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease and Healthy Counter Parents

Suboptimal vitamin D status is well reported in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients and associated with a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The investigators enrolled 42 SCD patients and 42 healthy controls, subjects within each group received monthly oral vitamin D3 dose according to the baseline status of vitamin D as follows: sufficient: 100,000 IU, insufficient: 150,000 IU, and deficient: 200,000 IU. The investigators assessed safety and efficacy on normalization of vitamin D level, bone mineral density (BMD), hand grip strength (HGS), and HRQL.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sharkia
      • Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt, 44519
        • Zagazig University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children with SCD (HbSS, hemoglobin sickle beta zero (HbSβ0) thalassemia genotype), aged ≤ 18 years old, male or female study participants who were at a steady state (≥ one month from blood transfusion and ≥ 14 days from any acute sickle complication as hospitalization for Vaso occlusive crisis (VOC) or acute chest syndrome (ACS)), stable Hb level near their usual baseline and stable dose of Hydroxyurea (HÚ) mg/kg for at least 90 days prior to enrollment.
  • A control group of 42 healthy age and sex-matching children

Exclusion Criteria:

  • SCD patients who are on chronic blood transfusion therapy
  • Comorbid chronic conditions
  • Use of medications known to interfere with calcium or vitamin D absorption or metabolism
  • Known hypercalcemia or vitamin D hypersensitivity
  • Use of vitamin D therapy to treat vitamin D deficiency or rickets
  • Urolithiasis, liver or renal impairment, and malabsorption disorders.
  • Obese children with body mass index (BMI) > 85th percentile for age and sex

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oral vitamin D3
Monthly oral vitamin D3 dose (100,000 IU,150,000 IU, and 200,000 IU)
Subjects within SCD as well as healthy controls, received monthly oral vitamin D3 dose, for 6 months, according to the baseline status of vitamin D as follows: sufficient (>30 ng/mL): 100,000 IU, insufficient (20-29.9 ng/mL): 150,000 IU, and deficient (<20 ng/mL): 200,000 IU.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum 25(OH)D level
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Serum 25(OH)D level change from baseline at 6 months
up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone mineral density (BMD)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
BMD was evaluated at the posterior-anterior spine, Z-scores were used to interpret the results, with Z-scores less than -2 standard deviation (SD) being regarded as abnormal
up to 6 months
Maximum handgrip strength (HGS)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Hand grip power using a handheld dynamometer.
up to 6 months
Health related quality of life (HRQL)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Health related quality of life (HRQL) assessed by HRQL questionnaires, The questionnaire was divided into eight subscales: physical function, role limitations resulting from physical health, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social function, role limitations resulting from emotional problems, and mental health. For each subscale: higher score indicated good health and ranged from 0 to 100.
up to 6 months
Serum concentrations of C reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Serum concentrations of inflammatory marker (CRP) level change from baseline
up to 6 months
Serum concentrations of Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Serum concentrations of inflammatory marker (ESR) level change from baseline
up to 6 months
Safety reporting of any adverse events
Time Frame: up to 6 months
e.g. nausea, drowsiness, vomiting, loss of appetite, constipation, confusion, cardiac arrhythmias, renal failure, coma
up to 6 months
Safety measurements of serum Ca
Time Frame: at 3 and 6 months
serum Ca levels
at 3 and 6 months
childhood health assessment
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Assessed by childhood health assessment questionnaire (CHAQ), There are four potential responses to each question: "without any difficulty" (score 0); "with some difficulty" (score 1); "with much difficulty" (score 2); and "unable to do" (score 3). A summary score known as CHAQ-DI/, which varies from 0 to 3, is calculated by averaging the highest score in each domain. For a CHAQ-DI score to be considered minimally clinically significant, it must be ≥ 0.75.
up to 6 months
Safety measurements of serum 25(OH)D levels
Time Frame: at 3 and 6 months
serum 25(OH)D levels
at 3 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D3

3
Subscribe