Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

PROs in Chronic Cervical Pain Patients With Accompanying Upper Limb Radiating Pain Treated With Pregabalin

PATIENT-REPORTED-OUTCOMES IN CHRONIC CERVICAL PAIN PATIENTS WITH ACCOMPANYING UPPER LIMB RADIATING PAIN (NEUROPATHIC COMPONENT) TREATED WITH PREGABALIN IN PRIMARY CARE SETTINGS

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of pregabalin on patient reported outcomes compared with conventional analgesic care in chronic cervical pain patients with accompanying upper limb radiating pain (neuropathic component) treated in primary care settings under routine clinical practice.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Rational and background:

Cervical pain with upper limb radiating pain(neuropathic component), such as cervical spondylosis radiculopathy or cervical spondylotic myelopathy, is one of the typical and common neuropathic pain. However, in Japan, large number of those patients are treated with NSAIDs without adequately assessing the cause of pain, despite that α2δ ligand, SNRI (Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors ), and TCA (Tricyclic Antidepressants) are recommended in the clinical guidelines for neuropathic pain. Therefore, treatment satisfaction of these patients is low. This is currently a major issue in treatment for cervical pain with neuropathic component in Japan. In fact, our previous study which assessed the effect of pregabalin in low back pain patients with radiculopathy suggested that the selection of appropriate analgesics according to the cause of pain improved pain related sleep interference, pain and function. However, there are a few reports with regard to effect of pregabalin in cervical pain patients with neuropathic component. Therefore, we propose to conduct an observational study in order to assess the effects of pregabalin in cervical radiculopathy, when added to routine clinical care. The present study can encourage an understanding of the necessary of assessing cause of the pain, and treating with appropriate analgesics.

Research objectives :

To evaluate the effect of pregabalin comparing with the conventional analgesic care in chronic cervical pain patients with accompanying upper limb radiating pain(neuropathic component) treated in primary care settings under routine clinical practice.

Study design:

This is an 8-week, multicenter prospective non-interventional observational study. Subjects who have chronic cervical radiating pain patients with accompanying upper limb radiating pain (with a neuropathic component) and meet all other entry criteria are enrolled at baseline in the duration of study. Study arms are pregabalin with or without usual care vs. usual care (mono/combo therapy). The usual care are assumed NSAIDs, Antidepressants, weak opioids, acetaminophen etc.

The analgesic treatment is determined by the clinical judgment of the physician in charge of patient management. This therapeutic choice is not related to the decision to take part in the study. All enrolled subjects will be received with analgesic treatment. The study requires 3 visits at least, baseline/enrollment visit, Week 4 visit and Week 8 visit (or discontinuation).

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

369

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Fukusima, Japan, 960-8251
        • Fukushima Daiichi Hospital
      • Saga, Japan, 840-8571
        • Saga-Ken Medical Center Koseikan
      • Tokyo, Japan, 104-0031
        • Tokyo Rheumatism Pain Clinic
    • Chiba
      • Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan, 272-0021
        • Satoh Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan, 272-0138
        • Shiraishi Orthopaedic Clinic
    • Fukuoka
      • Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan, 813-8501
        • Chihaya Hospital
      • Fukuokashi, Fukuoka, Japan, 810-0022
        • Clinic for Sports Medicine and Nutrition
      • Fukuokashi, Fukuoka, Japan, 812-0041
        • Seiwa Orthopedics Surgery Internal Medicine
      • Fukuokashi, Fukuoka, Japan, 812-0046
        • Kiheikai Yoh Orthopedic Clinic
      • Higashi-ku,Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan, 813-0017
        • Fukuoka Mirai Hospital
      • Kitakyusyu-shi, Fukuoka, Japan, 800-0057
        • Shin Komonji Hospital
    • Gunma
      • Takasaki-shi, Gunma, Japan, 370-0035
        • Takasaki Pain Clinic
    • Hokkaido
      • Sapporoshi, Hokkaido, Japan, 064-8570
        • Miyanomori Memorial Hospital
    • Hyogo
      • Himeji-shi, Hyogo, Japan, 670-0976
        • Oomuro Orthopedic Clinic
      • Kako-gun, Hyogo, Japan, 675-1115
        • Oonishi Medical Clinic
      • Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 657-0824
        • Watanabe Orthopaedic Clinic
    • Kanagawa
      • Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 252-0802
        • Fujisawa Shonandai Hospital
      • Kawasakishi, Kanagawa, Japan, 213-0001
        • Ando Orthopaedics Hospital
      • Sagamiharashi, Kanagawa, Japan, 252-5225
        • General Sagami Kosei Hospital
      • Saitama, Kanagawa, Japan, 356-0004
        • Arai Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Yamato-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 242-0024
        • Saitoh Orthopedic Sports Clinic
    • Saitama
      • Ageo, Saitama, Japan, 362-0021
        • Ageo Medical Clinic
    • Tokyo
      • Adachi, Tokyo, Japan, 120-0033
        • Nakaicho Clinic
      • Chuo, Tokyo, Japan, 104-0031
        • Kyobashi Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Edogawa, Tokyo, Japan, 133-0057
        • Morishima Clinic
      • Katsushika, Tokyo, Japan, 124-0024
        • Shinkoiwa Ekimae Sogo Clinic
      • Meguro, Tokyo, Japan, 152-0002
        • Meguro Seikeigeka Naika
      • Meguro, Tokyo, Japan, 153-0065
        • Meguro Yuai Clinic
      • Ohta, Tokyo, Japan, 145-0066
        • Takemoto Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan, 140-0014
        • Ohimachi Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Shinnzyuku, Tokyo, Japan, 169-0073
        • Shinjuku Research Park Clinic
      • Suginami, Tokyo, Japan, 166-0003
        • Kouenji Orthopedic Clinic
      • Toshima, Tokyo, Japan, 171-0033
        • Daido Hospital

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

20 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

Chronic cervical pain patients with accompanying upper limb radiating pain (neuropathic component) treated with pregabalin or other analgesics

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

Subject who received the enough study information and signed informed consent form.

Subject who had chronic pain with accompanying radiating pain to the superior limb beyond the elbow.

Subject is male or female patient ≧20 years old. Subject who reported neck pain with accompanying radiating pain to superior limb (12 weeks or greater in duration at Visit 0).

Subject who is refractory to previous analgesics for 12 weeks and more. Subject who is able and willing to complete all study related assessment tools and complied with scheduled clinic visits and clinical study procedures.

Subject whose pain NRS ≧5 and PRSIS ≧1 at baseline (based on recall over the past week).

Exclusion Criteria:

Subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, was not likely to complete the trial for whatever reason.

Subject who was treated with Pregabalin within the past 12 weeks (on baseline). Subject who has been regularly treated cervical pain with nerve blocks (such as stellate ganglion block, epidural block, radicular block and trigger point injection etc.).

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

Kohorten und Interventionen

Gruppe / Kohorte
Intervention / Behandlung
Pregabalin / Other analgesics
Patients will be treated for 8 weeks with pregabalin in primary care: no intervention
The study is observational.
Other analgesics
Patients will be treated for 8 weeks with other analgesics in usual care: no intervention
The study is observational.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change From Baseline at 8 weeks in Pain Related Sleep Interference Scale (PRSIS - Past Week Recall)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
The Pain Related Sleep Interference Scale (past week recall) consists of an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (pain did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interfered with sleep). Subjects are to describe how their pain has interfered with their sleep during the past week by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10.
Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change From Baseline in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is an index of how well patients with cervical pain are able to function with regard to daily activities. The score for the index ranges from 0 to 50 with a lower score indicating better function. In the event that a patient has used rescue medication within 12 hours of the clinic visit, the patient should respond to the questions based on their functional ability in the 24 hour period just preceding the use of rescue medication.
Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
Change From Baseline in Pain Numeric Rating Scale (Pain NRS - past week recall)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
The Pain NRS (past week recall) consists of an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Subjects are asked to describe their average pain during the past week by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10.
Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
Change From Baseline in Euro Qol- 5 Dimensions -5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)-QOL-Score-
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)

The EQ-5D-5L is a copyrighted, subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are two components to the EQ-5D-5L: A Health State Profile and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Recent guidance suggests that the Health State Profile and VAS should be administered together.

The Health State Profile is designed to record the subject's level of current health for five domains comprising a health profile: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Responses from the five domains are used to calculate a single utility index value.

Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
Change From Baseline in Euro Qol- 5 Dimensions -5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)-Visual Analogue Scale -
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)

The EQ-5D-5L is a copyrighted, subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are two components to the EQ-5D-5L: A Health State Profile and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Recent guidance suggests that the Health State Profile and VAS should be administered together.

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is designed to rate the subject's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100 where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

Baseline, Visit 2 (week 4), Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
Zeitfenster: Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
The CGIC assessment includes one question (1-7 scale) inquiring about the subject's improvement considering their current disease state.
Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Zeitfenster: Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
The PGIC is a subject-rated instrument that measures change in the subject's overall status on a 7-point scale. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: (WPAI: GH)
Zeitfenster: Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)
The WPAI: GH is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities. Unlike general health or disease-specific measures, the WPAI:GH assesses function-related endpoints to allow a measure of the economic impact of relative differences in either the safety or efficacy of therapeutic endpoints. In this study, the WPAI: GH will measure the effect of the patient's chronic cervical pain with accompanying upper limb pain (neuropathic component) on work productivity and regular activities.
Final visit (week 8 or discontinuation)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. Oktober 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

24. Oktober 2017

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

24. Oktober 2017

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

9. August 2016

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

11. August 2016

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

16. August 2016

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

20. Januar 2021

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

15. Januar 2021

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Januar 2019

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Zervikale Schmerzen

Klinische Studien zur No Intervention

3
Abonnieren