VA Integrated Medication Manager (IMM)
17 maggio 2016 aggiornato da: University of Utah
Veterans Affairs Integrated Medication Manager
The purpose of this study is to advance the science of healthcare informatics and to improve medication management through the development of a new approach to the electronic medical record called the Integrated Medication Manager (IMM).
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Completato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
In an attempt to address problems patient non-compliance with quality goals barriers to access and integration of health information that impede achievement of treatment goals, the VA is developing a new approach to the electronic medical record. The VA is moving away from the paper-chart metaphor and towards an integrated representation of the patient's status and care process across time. One of the first steps in the development phase has been to explicitly relate patient conditions, therapies, and goals in the domain of pharmacotherapy. This is called Integrated Medication Management and draws on Hollnagel's Contextual Control Model. Providers will be able to plan care and create orders directly in the context of these explicit relationships. This application will be implemented nationwide through a web interface embedded within the existing Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS), the graphical user interface to VA Information Systems (VistA).
Aim 1: Identify cognitive components of providers' therapeutic decision making in the field.
Aim 2. Refine and evaluate the Integrated Medication Manager using simulation studies.
- Aim 2.a. Refine interfaces and logic of the Integrated Medication Manager.
- Aim 2.b. Compare the performance of the Integrated Medication Manager and usual CPRS.
All hypotheses (below) test the use of IMM versus usual electronic medical record (EMR).
- Speed of decision-making will be faster.
- Accuracy of data interpretation (clinical assessment) will be higher.
- Appropriateness of therapeutic plans will be higher.
- Efficiency of gathering information will be higher.
- Common ground measures will be higher.
- Appropriateness of therapeutic plans will be higher when relevant data is outside the usual time horizon.
- Appropriateness of therapeutic plans will be higher when complex associations among patient therapies and goals exist.
- Appropriateness of therapeutic plans will be no lower when relevant data is not captured by the displays of the IMM.
- Appropriateness of therapeutic plans will be higher when highly salient data is not germane to the most important problem.
- Appropriateness of therapeutic plans will be higher when cognitive load is high due to interruptions.
Tipo di studio
Interventistico
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
58
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, Stati Uniti, 84148
- VA SLC Health Care System
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)
Accetta volontari sani
Sì
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Tutto
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Practiced in primary care for at least two years
- Third year residents with two years of residency in internal medicine or family practice
- Do not have to be currently practicing
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Piano di studio
Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Integrated Medication Manager
Experienced providers that participated in the EHR simulations.
Half of the providers were assigned to use the new Integrated Medication Manager (intervention) during the simulation.
The other half were assigned the VA's CPRS to use (standard EHR).
Providers were randomly assigned which system to use.
|
A theory based electronic health record.
Half of the provider participants were assigned the IMM to use.
The other half were assigned the VA's CPRS EHR to use for the simulation.
Providers were randomly assigned to a EHR to use.
Altri nomi:
|
|
Nessun intervento: Standard EHR
Experienced providers that participated in the EHR simulations.
Half of the providers were assigned to use the new Integrated Medication Manager (intervention) during the simulation.
The other half were assigned the VA's CPRS to use (standard EHR).
Providers were randomly assigned which system to use.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Amount of Time to Complete Assessment and Plan
Lasso di tempo: 10 minutes
|
Each participant had 10 minutes maximum to review the patient case and write an Assessment and Plan.
|
10 minutes
|
|
Accuracy of Written Assessment and Plan in Terms of Control and Status
Lasso di tempo: 10 minutes
|
Each participant had 10 minutes maximum to review the patient case and write an Assessment and Plan.
The primary outcome evaluated participants' recommendations for treatment of patient conditions.
Participants reviewed a total of 10 patient cases and received a score between 0 and 3 points for each issue within each patient case.
The final score for each participant was a proportion between 0 and 1.
The proportion represented the sum of all points assigned to the participant, divided by the total number of points possible.
Higher values on the scale represent greater accuracy of the written assessment and plan.
|
10 minutes
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Identification of Planned Monitoring and Follow up Encounters in Assessment and Plan
Lasso di tempo: 10 minutes
|
Each participant had 10 minutes maximum to review the patient case and write an Assessment and Plan. .
The secondary outcome evaluated participants' recommendation about future monitoring of patient conditions.
Participants reviewed a total of 10 patient cases and received a score of 0 or 1 point for each issue within each case.
The final score for each participant was a proportion between 0 and 1.
The proportion represented the sum of all points assigned to the participant, divided by the total number of points possible.
Higher values on the scale represent a greater proportion of appropriate monitoring recommendations made.
|
10 minutes
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.
Sponsor
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Jonathan Nebeker, MD, MS, University of Utah
Pubblicazioni e link utili
La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.
Pubblicazioni generali
- Phillips LS, Branch WT, Cook CB, Doyle JP, El-Kebbi IM, Gallina DL, Miller CD, Ziemer DC, Barnes CS. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Nov 6;135(9):825-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-9-200111060-00012.
- Crosson JC, Stroebel C, Scott JG, Stello B, Crabtree BF. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making, and conflict. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;3(4):307-11. doi: 10.1370/afm.326.
- Tinetti ME, Bogardus ST Jr, Agostini JV. Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30;351(27):2870-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb042458. No abstract available.
- Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hogan MM, Hayward RA, Shekelle P, Rubenstein L, Keesey J, Adams J, Kerr EA. Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21;141(12):938-45. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00010.
- Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
- Perlin JB, Pogach LM. Improving the outcomes of metabolic conditions: managing momentum to overcome clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):525-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00012. No abstract available.
- Morris AH. Developing and implementing computerized protocols for standardization of clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Mar 7;132(5):373-83. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-5-200003070-00007.
- Fox J, Alabassi A, Black E, Hurt C, Rose T. Modelling clinical goals: a corpus of examples and a tentative ontology. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;101:31-45.
- Xiao Y, Hunter WA, Mackenzie CF, Jefferies NJ, Horst RL. Task complexity in emergency medical care and its implications for team coordination. LOTAS Group. Level One Trauma Anesthesia Simulation. Hum Factors. 1996 Dec;38(4):636-45. doi: 10.1518/001872096778827206.
- Nebeker JR, Hurdle JF, Bair BD. Future history: medical informatics in geriatrics. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Sep;58(9):M820-5. doi: 10.1093/gerona/58.9.m820.
- Hayward RA, Asch SM, Hogan MM, Hofer TP, Kerr EA. Sins of omission: getting too little medical care may be the greatest threat to patient safety. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Aug;20(8):686-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0152.x.
- Shekelle PG. Invited commentary: Implementation of health information technology: an important but challenging field of inquiry. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2006 Oct;19(4):313. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2006.11928190. No abstract available.
- Weir CR, Nebeker JJ, Hicken BL, Campo R, Drews F, Lebar B. A cognitive task analysis of information management strategies in a computerized provider order entry environment. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):65-75. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2231. Epub 2006 Oct 26.
- Berg CA, Strough JN, Calderone KS, Sansone C, Weir C. The role of problem definitions in understanding age and context effects on strategies for solving everyday problems. Psychol Aging. 1998 Mar;13(1):29-44. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.1.29.
- Weir CR. Linking information needs with evaluation: the role of task identification. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:310-4.
- Taatz H. [The problem of the time factor in orthodontic treatment]. Stomatol DDR. 1976 Feb;26(2):102-5. No abstract available. German.
- Campbell M, Grimshaw J, Steen N. Sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials. Changing Professional Practice in Europe Group (EU BIOMED II Concerted Action). J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jan;5(1):12-6. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500105.
- Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Mar-Apr;23(2):116-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116.
- Bradley EH, Bogardus ST Jr, Tinetti ME, Inouye SK. Goal-setting in clinical medicine. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jul;49(2):267-78. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00107-0.
Studiare le date dei record
Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio
1 ottobre 2007
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
1 marzo 2011
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
1 marzo 2011
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
22 gennaio 2013
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
5 febbraio 2013
Primo Inserito (Stima)
8 febbraio 2013
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Stima)
23 giugno 2016
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
17 maggio 2016
Ultimo verificato
1 maggio 2016
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 5R18HS017186-03 (Sovvenzione/contratto AHRQ degli Stati Uniti)
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Fascicolo Sanitario Elettronico
-
University of Dublin, Trinity CollegeSconosciutoBrain Health Atleti d'élite in pensione
-
University of Colorado, DenverEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... e altri collaboratoriAttivo, non reclutanteServizi Sanitari Preventivi (PREV HEALTH SERV)Stati Uniti
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenBill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Aga Khan UniversityAttivo, non reclutanteUnder Five Child Health Nutrizione e immunizzazionePakistan
-
Queens College, The City University of New YorkReclutamentoPubblicazione di articoli sottoposti all'American Journal of Public HealthStati Uniti
-
KTO Karatay UniversityCompletatoComportamenti di stile di vita sani | E-Health AlfabetizzazioneTacchino
-
Kliniek ViaSanaSt. Anna Ziekenhuis, Geldrop, NetherlandsCompletatoDolore | Uso di oppioidi | Sostituzione totale del ginocchio | App E-healthOlanda
-
Brown UniversityJohns Hopkins University; University of Arkansas; Anhui Medical UniversityCompletato
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletatoInfermieri che lavorano presso il Community Mental Health Welfare CenterCorea, Repubblica di
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)ReclutamentoCardiochirurgia, Cardiochirurgia, Educazione alla dimissione, Infermieristica, Telenursing, m-Health, Qualità della vita, RecuperoTacchino
-
Hospital Central Sur de Alta EspecialidadSconosciutoIctus | Scala dell'ictus del National Institutes of Health | Proteina C-reattiva ad alta sensibilità del sieroMessico
Prove cliniche su Integrated Medication Manager
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompletato
-
Scott & White Health PlanCompletato
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillMedical University of South Carolina; National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) e altri collaboratoriCompletatoHIV/AIDS | Aderenza ai farmaci | HIV | Comportamento sessuale | Infezioni a trasmissione sessuale (non HIV o epatite)Stati Uniti
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityRita & Alex Hillman FoundationCompletatoBroncopneumopatia cronica ostruttivaStati Uniti
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityIndependence Blue CrossAttivo, non reclutanteMalattia di Alzheimer | Degenerazione frontotemporale | Demenza vascolare | Demenza di tipo Alzheimer | Demenza a corpi di Lewy | Demenza mista | Compromissione cognitiva vascolareStati Uniti
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...SconosciutoMetastasi ossee | Radioterapia | Tecnologia
-
Eleos HealthCenterstone Research InstituteIscrizione su invitoDisordine depressivo | Disturbi d'ansia | Disturbo post traumatico da stress | Disturbi da Uso di SostanzeStati Uniti
-
José Ignacio Recio RodriguezGerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y Leon; Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales... e altri collaboratoriNon ancora reclutamentoPluripatologia complessa e cronica
-
Brown UniversityReclutamentoArtrite | Dolore cronico | Dolore lombare cronico | Sindrome dell'intestino irritabile | Fibromialgia | Dolore acuto | Trauma, multiplo | Dolore neuropatico | Disturbi dell'articolazione temporomandibolare | Dolore post operatorio | Sindrome da dolore cronico | Dolore cronico alla spalla | Neuropatia Diabetica Dolorosa e altre condizioniStati Uniti
-
Rhode Island HospitalAttivo, non reclutanteInfarto miocardico | Polmonite | Riammissione ospedaliera | BPCO