Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Normal Sensation and Pain in Healthy Volunteers

11. April 2017 aktualisiert von: Michael Froelich, University of Alabama at Birmingham

The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Normal Sensation and Pain in Healthy Volunteers (Carl Koller Grant) (The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Allodynia)

The purpose of this study is to study if lidocaine, given intravenously, reduces pain.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Clinicians use lidocaine intravenously in a fashion that suggests that it might have analgesic effects. Therefore, we test the hypothesis that lidocaine reduces pain intensity in response to experimental pain.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

22

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, Vereinigte Staaten, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

19 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy Adult Volunteers, age >19 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Substance Abuse
  • Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): unstable
  • Congestive Heart Failure (CHF): unstable
  • Heart Arrhythmia: symptomatic
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Lidocaine Allergy
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Rev IV): Axis I: Common Axis I disorders include depression, anxiety disorders,bipolar disorder, ADHD, and schizophrenia. Axis II: borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and mild mental retardation.
  • Presence of Contraindications for MRI
  • Presence of electronically, magnetically, and mechanically activated implants
  • Electronically, magnetically, and mechanically activated implants
  • Ferromagnetic or electronically operated active devices like automatic cardioverter defibrillators
  • Cardiac pacemakers
  • Metallic splinters in the eye
  • Ferromagnetic haemostatic clips in the central nervous system (CNS)
  • Claustrophobia
  • Pregnancy

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Lidocaine
Lidocaine 2% (2mg/ml) was administered via a computer assisted infusion to achieve a target plasma concentration of 2 mcg/ml; infused within 20 minutes.
Arzneimittel: Lidocaine
Lidocaine 2% (2mg/ml) was administered via a computer assisted infusion to achieve a target plasma concentration of 2 mcg/ml; infused within 20 minutes.
Andere Namen:
  • Lokale Betäubung

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Ischemic Pain
Zeitfenster: baseline, during 20 minute lidocaine infusion, and 30 minutes after discontinuation of lidocaine infusion
The right arm was exsanguinated by elevating it above heart level for 30 seconds, after which the arm was occluded with a standard blood pressure cuff positioned proximal to the elbow inflated to twice the participant's mean arterial pressure. Participants then performed 20 handgrip exercises of 2-second duration at 4-second intervals at 50% of their maximum grip strength. Pain was rated on a scale from 0 - 10 with 0 being no pain to 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
baseline, during 20 minute lidocaine infusion, and 30 minutes after discontinuation of lidocaine infusion
Electrical Pain
Zeitfenster: Baseline, during 20 minutes lidocaine infusion, and 30 minutes after completion of lidocaine infusion
Peripheral nerve stimulation electrodes were attached to the base and the tip of the third digit and connected to a constant current stimulator (DS7A, Digitimer Ltd, Hertfordshire, England). Ascending electrical stimuli of 2000 mu duration, ranging from 0.5 to 35 mA (ampere) was administered one per second in 0.5 mA increments. Participants were instructed to indicate when they first felt the slightest sense of pain (electrical pain threshold, EPTh) and when they were unable to tolerate a further increase (electrical pain tolerance, EPTo). For each measure, the average of three trials was computed for use in subsequent analyses. Each of the three electrical pain stimuli were presented three times and balanced in order using a Graeco-Latin square design. The pain scale is between 0 and 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
Baseline, during 20 minutes lidocaine infusion, and 30 minutes after completion of lidocaine infusion
Heat Pain
Zeitfenster: baseline, during 20 minute lidocaine infusion, and 30 minutes after completion of lidocaine infusion
The thermal procedure involved a baseline assessment of heat pain threshold and tolerance. Contact heat stimuli were delivered using a computer-controlled Medoc Thermal Sensory Analyzer (TSA-II; Ramat Yishai, Israel), which is a peltier elementbased stimulator. Temperature levels were monitored by a thermistor and returned to a preset baseline of 32°C by active cooling at a rate of 10°C/s. The 3 × 3 cm contact probe was applied to the right forearm. The pain scale is between 0 and 10 with 1 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
baseline, during 20 minute lidocaine infusion, and 30 minutes after completion of lidocaine infusion
Cold Pain
Zeitfenster: baseline, during 20 minute infusion, and 30 minutes after lidocaine infusion
The participant's foot was immersed up to the ankle into a container filled with ice water of 3°C. Participants were instructed to maintain their foot in the container until the cold pain became intolerable (cold pain tolerance). The length of time was recorded in seconds. This procedure was repeated once with a gap of at least fifteen minutes in-between repeated tests. The range was 0 seconds to 120 seconds
baseline, during 20 minute infusion, and 30 minutes after lidocaine infusion
Tactile Sensation
Zeitfenster: baseline, during 20 minute infusion, and 30 minutes after completion of infusion
Pin prick sensory thresholds (PPT) were obtained by touching the skin in-between the first and second metacarpal bone with a 23-gauge needles which moved freely out of a 10 mL plastic syringe barrel. The pin prick sensation was modified by adding small weights to the 23-gauge needles (from 0.2 to 5.2 mg). A syringe barrel of tuberculin (TB) needles that were cut to different lengths to add the desired weight to the 23-gauge needle. The PPT was determined using the weighted 23-gauge needle in ascending order, according to the method of limits. This assessment was to evaluate whether participants were able to feel the touch of the needle. The participant's arm was placed on a tray table. A linen sheet was suspended in-between two IV poles in such a fashion that the subject's view of his/her hand was blocked. Normal values are between 0.21mg and 5mg.
baseline, during 20 minute infusion, and 30 minutes after completion of infusion

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Mitarbeiter

American Society of Regional Anesthesia

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Michael Froelich, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. April 2008

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Januar 2012

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Januar 2012

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

9. April 2008

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

11. April 2008

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

14. April 2008

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

17. Mai 2017

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

11. April 2017

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. April 2017

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • F061204013

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Schmerzen

Klinische Studien zur Lidocaine

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Zimbabwe

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

3
Abonnieren