- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT05329194
Wirksamkeits- und Sicherheitsstudie von Tezepelumab bei Erwachsenen und jugendlichen Teilnehmern mit schwerem Asthma in den Vereinigten Staaten (PASSAGE)
Eine multizentrische, einarmige, offene Phase-4-Studie zur Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Tezepelumab nach der Zulassung bei erwachsenen und jugendlichen Teilnehmern mit schwerem Asthma, einschließlich mehrerer unzureichend untersuchter Populationen in den Vereinigten Staaten (PASSAGE)
Studienübersicht
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Phase
- Phase 4
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Alabama
-
Mobile, Alabama, Vereinigte Staaten, 36608
- Research Site
-
-
Arizona
-
Gilbert, Arizona, Vereinigte Staaten, 85234
- Research Site
-
-
California
-
Long Beach, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90815
- Research Site
-
Los Angeles, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90017
- Research Site
-
Rancho Mirage, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92270
- Research Site
-
Westminster, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92683
- Research Site
-
-
Colorado
-
Colorado Springs, Colorado, Vereinigte Staaten, 80907
- Research Site
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, Vereinigte Staaten, 06510
- Research Site
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Vereinigte Staaten, 20037
- Research Site
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, Vereinigte Staaten, 60611
- Research Site
-
-
Kentucky
-
Lexington, Kentucky, Vereinigte Staaten, 40509
- Research Site
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, Vereinigte Staaten, 70112
- Research Site
-
-
Maryland
-
Upper Marlboro, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 20772
- Research Site
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, Vereinigte Staaten, 48109
- Research Site
-
Ypsilanti, Michigan, Vereinigte Staaten, 48197
- Research Site
-
-
Minnesota
-
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Vereinigte Staaten, 55109
- Research Site
-
-
Missouri
-
St Louis, Missouri, Vereinigte Staaten, 63110
- Research Site
-
-
Nebraska
-
Lincoln, Nebraska, Vereinigte Staaten, 68505
- Research Site
-
Omaha, Nebraska, Vereinigte Staaten, 68114
- Research Site
-
-
New York
-
Hollis, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 11423
- Research Site
-
Horseheads, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 14845
- Research Site
-
Rochester, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 14642
- Research Site
-
Valhalla, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 10595
- Research Site
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 27514
- Research Site
-
Wilmington, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 28401
- Research Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Toledo, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 43617
- Research Site
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Vereinigte Staaten, 73120
- Research Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Altoona, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 16602
- Research Site
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 19140
- Research Site
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Warwick, Rhode Island, Vereinigte Staaten, 02886
- Research Site
-
-
South Carolina
-
Greenville, South Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 29607
- Research Site
-
-
Tennessee
-
Hendersonville, Tennessee, Vereinigte Staaten, 37075
- Research Site
-
-
Texas
-
Fort Worth, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 76104
- Research Site
-
McKinney, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 75069
- Research Site
-
San Antonio, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 78229
- Research Site
-
-
Virginia
-
Charlottesville, Virginia, Vereinigte Staaten, 22903
- Research Site
-
-
Washington
-
Vancouver, Washington, Vereinigte Staaten, 98664
- Research Site
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Einschlusskriterien:
- Der männliche oder weibliche Teilnehmer muss zum Zeitpunkt der Unterzeichnung der Einverständniserklärung oder Zustimmung mindestens 12 Jahre alt sein.
- Dokumentiertes, vom Arzt diagnostiziertes Asthma für mindestens 12 Monate und vom Prüfarzt bestätigt, dass es nicht auf alternative Diagnosen zurückzuführen ist.
- Dokumentierte Behandlung mit mittel- bis hochdosiertem ICS gemäß den Richtlinien der Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) (GINA 2021) für mindestens 12 Monate.
- Verwendung von zusätzlichen Asthma-Erhaltungsmedikamenten zusätzlich zu ICS für mindestens 12 Monate. Die zusätzliche Erhaltungsmedikation kann in einem Kombinationsprodukt (z. B. ICS/lang wirksamer β-Agonist (LABA)) enthalten sein.
- Dokumentierte Geschichte von mindestens 2 Asthma-Exazerbationen während der 12 Monate.
- Entscheidung des Arztes, dass der Teilnehmer gemäß der zugelassenen Produktbeilage der Vereinigten Staaten (USPI) für eine Behandlung mit Tezepelumab geeignet ist.
- Derzeit von Fachärzten (z. B. Pneumologen und/oder Allergologen) betreut.
- Abschluss der vollständigen COVID-19-Impfung mindestens 28 Tage vor der Tezepelumab-Verabreichung. Die Einnahme einer zugelassenen Auffrischimpfung ist keine Voraussetzung für die Teilnahme an dieser Studie.
- Bereitstellung einer unterschriebenen und datierten schriftlichen Einverständniserklärung.
Ausschlusskriterien:
- Jede Kontraindikation für Tezepelumab gemäß dem in den USA zugelassenen Produktetikett oder nach Meinung des Prüfarztes.
- Komorbide Diagnose einer schweren oder sehr schweren chronisch obstruktiven Lungenerkrankung (COPD) nach GOLD-Leitlinie (GOLD 2021).
- Vorherige biologische Anwendung zur Behandlung von Asthma innerhalb von 4 Monaten oder 5 Halbwertszeiten (je nachdem, welcher Zeitraum länger ist).
- Teilnahme an einer interventionellen klinischen Studie für Asthma innerhalb von 12 Monaten.
- Beurteilung des Prüfarztes, dass der Teilnehmer die Studienverfahren, Einschränkungen und Anforderungen wahrscheinlich nicht einhalten wird.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: N / A
- Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Tezepelumab
Die Teilnehmer erhalten alle 4 Wochen (Q4W) von Woche 0 bis Woche 48 210 mg Tezepelumab.
|
Die Teilnehmer erhalten eine subkutane Injektion von Tezepelumab.
Andere Namen:
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Annualized Asthma Exacerbation Rate (AAER)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Asthma exacerbations were defined by worsening of asthma symptoms that leads to temporary bolus/burst of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 consecutive days, or an emergency department (ED) or urgent care visit due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroid (SCS), and/or inpatient hospitalization (≥24 hours) due to asthma. The AAER was based on exacerbations reported by the investigator over 52 weeks. The exacerbation rate was compared between the 12-month period before [baseline period (BP)] and the 12-month period after initiation of tezepelumab [up to study Week 52 (Visit 15) = study period (SP)]. |
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Asthma Exacerbations
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The number of participants with at least one asthma exacerbation in the 12-month period before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (study period) (up to study Week 52 = study period) were assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Number of Participants Who Completed the 52 -Week Study Period With Any Reduction in Total Number of Asthma Exacerbations
Zeitfenster: From Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0) to Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The number of participants who completed the 52 -week study period following tezepelumab initiation with at least 50% reduction, and 100% reduction in total number of asthma exacerbations were assessed.
|
From Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0) to Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Cumulative Asthma Exacerbation Days
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The cumulative asthma exacerbation days over 52 weeks before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (study period) was assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Time to First Asthma Exacerbation
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
The time to first exacerbation after initiation of tezepelumab was assessed.
Data for median time to event have been presented for this endpoint.
The median is the descriptive statistics median calculated using a subset of Participants with an event.
|
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Rate of Asthma Exacerbations Associated With Hospitalizations
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The rate of asthma exacerbations associated with hospitalization over 52 weeks before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (study period) was assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Rate of Asthma Exacerbations Associated With Emergency Department /Urgent Care (ED/UC) Visits
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The rate of asthma exacerbations associated with ED/UC visits over 52 weeks before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (study period) was assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Rate of Asthma Exacerbations Associated With Hospitalizations or ED/UC Visits
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The rate of asthma exacerbations associated with hospitalizations or ED/UC visits over 52 weeks before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (study period) was assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Number of Participants With Asthma Exacerbations Associated With Hospitalizations or ED/UC Visits
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The number of participants with asthma exacerbations associated with hospitalizations or ED/UC visits in in the 12-month periods before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (study period) (up to study Week 52 = study period) were assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Cumulative Asthma Exacerbation Days Associated With Hospitalizations or ED/UC Visits
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The cumulative asthma exacerbation days associated with hospitalizations or ED/UC over 52 weeks before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (study period) were assessed. Total days of exacerbations resulting in hospitalizations or ED/UC visits have been presented. |
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Pre-bronchodilator (Pre-BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
Lung function (FEV1) was measured pre-bronchodilator (pre-BD) by spirometry test.
FEV1 is defined as the volume of air exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced expiration.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
Change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 was assessed after initiation of tezepelumab.
FEV1 is defined as the volume of air exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced expiration.
|
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Number of Pre-BD FEV1 Responders
Zeitfenster: Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
Number of pre-BD FEV1 responders was defined as participants who achieved either at least 5% or 100 mL improvement from baseline.
|
Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
The Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) is a shortened version of the ACQ that assesses the adequacy of asthma control and change in asthma control which occurs spontaneously or as a result of treatment.
ACQ assesses symptoms and rescue bronchodilator use.
Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled), with higher scores indicating worse asthma control.
The mean (average) ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) is a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) tool intended to identify participants 12 years and older whose health may be at risk because of uncontrolled asthma.
It has 10 questions that ask about respiratory symptoms, activity limitation, sleep, rescue medication use, social activities, exercise, difficulty controlling asthma, and exacerbations.
All items have a yes/no response option and the tool is scored by summing the total number of 'yes' responses.
This sum score is used to assess level of asthma control, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse asthma control, where: 0-1 is well controlled, 2-4 is not well controlled, and 5-10 is very poorly controlled.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a 50-item Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) instrument used to measure health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases.
Questionnaire has 2 parts: part 1 consists of 8 items pertaining to severity of respiratory symptoms in preceding 4 weeks; part 2 consists of 42 items related to daily activity and psychosocial impacts of individual's respiratory condition.
SGRQ yields a total score and 3 components scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts).
Total score indicates impact of disease on overall health status, and it is expressed as percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents worst possible health status and 0 indicates best possible health status.
Likewise, domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of greater impairment.
|
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Change From Baseline in ACQ-6 Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
Change from baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) score was assessed. The ACQ-6 is a shortened version of the ACQ that assesses the adequacy of asthma control and change in asthma control which occurs spontaneously or as a result of treatment. ACQ assesses symptoms and rescue bronchodilator use. Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled), with higher scores indicating worse asthma control. |
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Change From Baseline in AIRQ Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
Change from baseline in Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) score was assessed.
AIRQ is a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) tool intended to identify participants 12 years and older whose health may be at risk because of uncontrolled asthma.
It has 10 questions that ask about respiratory symptoms, activity limitation, sleep, rescue medication use, social activities, exercise, difficulty controlling asthma, and exacerbations.
All items have a yes/no response option and the tool is scored by summing the total number of 'yes' responses.
This sum score is used to assess level of asthma control, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse asthma control, where: 0-1 is well controlled, 2-4 is not well controlled, and 5-10 is very poorly controlled.
|
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Change From Baseline in SGRQ Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
Change from baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score was assessed.
SGRQ is a 50-item Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) instrument used to measure health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases.
Questionnaire has 2 parts: part 1 consists of 8 items pertaining to severity of respiratory symptoms in preceding 4 weeks; part 2 consists of 42 items related to daily activity and psychosocial impacts of individual's respiratory condition.
SGRQ yields a total score and 3 components scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts).
Total score indicates impact of disease on overall health status, and it is expressed as percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents worst possible health status and 0 indicates best possible health status.
Likewise, domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of greater impairment.
|
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months) and Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Number of ACQ-6 Responders
Zeitfenster: Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
Number of ACQ-6 responders were assessed.
Individual changes from baseline of ≥ 0.5 were considered to be clinically meaningful (minimum clinically important difference [MCID]).
ACQ-6 responders in this study were defined as participants who achieved ≥ 1 MCID.
|
Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Number of AIRQ Responders
Zeitfenster: Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
Number of AIRQ responders were assessed.
Individual changes from baseline of ≥ 2 were considered to be clinically meaningful (MCID).
AIRQ responders in this study were defined as participants who achieved ≥ 1 MCID.
|
Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Number of SGRQ Responders
Zeitfenster: Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
Number of SGRQ responders were assessed.
Individual changes from baseline of ≥ 4 were considered to be clinically meaningful (MCID).
SGRQ (total and component score) responders in this study were defined as participants who achieved ≥ 1 MCID.
|
Week 24 (Visit 8 = 6 months), Week 52 (Visit 15 = 12 months)
|
|
Number of Participants Who Require Any Systemic Corticosteroid (SCS) Use
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Number of participants who require any SCS use in the 12-month periods before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (up to study Week 52 = study period) were assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Cumulative Annualized SCS Dose
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Cumulative annualized SCS dose in the 12-month periods before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (up to study Week 52 = study period) were assessed. Cumulative annualized SCS dose for each participant was calculated as followed: Cumulative annualized SCS dose = [sum of (cumulative SCS dose)/length of the planned treatment period]*365.25 |
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Number of Participants Who Require Longer-term (>30 Consecutive Days) SCS Use
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Number of participants who require longer-term (>30 consecutive days) SCS use in the 12-month periods before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (up to study Week 52 = study period) were assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Number and Type of Asthma-related Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Number of participants with specific type of asthma-related HRU in the 12-month period before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (up to study Week 52 = study period) were assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Duration of Asthma-related Hospitalizations
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Duration of asthma-related hospitalization in the 12-month period before (baseline period) and after initiation of tezepelumab (up to study Week 52 = study period) was assessed.
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
AAER for Asthma Exacerbations (Subgroups of Participants)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
AAER based on asthma exacerbations in the 12-month period before [baseline period (BP)] and after initiation of tezepelumab [up to study Week 52 = study period (SP)] was assessed in following subgroups of participants: Blood eosinophil count (BEC) ≥300 cells/microliter; BEC <300 cells/microliter; With clinically-relevant allergy to perennial aeroallergen; Without clinically-relevant allergy to a perennial aeroallergen; Participants who identify as Black/African American; Adolescents (12-17 years); Comorbid diagnosis of mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); Significant smoking history (≥10 pack-years of smoking).
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Number of Participants With Asthma Exacerbations (Subgroups of Participants)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The number of participants with at least one asthma exacerbations in the 12-month period before [baseline period (BP)] and after initiation of tezepelumab [up to study Week 52 = study period (SP)] were assessed in the following subgroups of participants: BEC ≥300 cells/microliter; BEC <300 cells/microliter; With a clinically-relevant allergy to a perennial aeroallergen; Without a clinically-relevant allergy to a perennial aeroallergen; Participants who identify as Black/African American; Adolescents (12-17 years); Comorbid diagnosis of mild to moderate COPD; Significant smoking history (≥10 pack-years of smoking).
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Number of Participants Who Completed the 52-week Study With Any Reduction in Total Number of Asthma Exacerbations (Subgroups of Participants)
Zeitfenster: From Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0) to Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The number of participants who completed the 52-week study period following tezepelumab initiation with at least 50% reduction, and 100% reduction in total number of asthma exacerbations were assessed in the following subgroups of participants: BEC ≥300 cells/microliter; BEC <300 cells/microliter; With a clinically-relevant allergy to a perennial aeroallergen; Without a clinically-relevant allergy to a perennial aeroallergen; Participants who identify as Black/African American; Adolescents (12-17 years); Comorbid diagnosis of mild to moderate COPD; Significant smoking history (≥10 pack-years of smoking).
|
From Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0) to Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Cumulative Asthma Exacerbation Days (Subgroups of Participants)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
The cumulative asthma exacerbation days over 52 weeks before [baseline period (BP)] and after initiation of tezepelumab [study period (SP)] were assessed in the following subgroups of participants: BEC ≥300 cells/microliter; BEC <300 cells/microliter; With a clinically-relevant allergy to a perennial aeroallergen; Without a clinically-relevant allergy to a perennial aeroallergen; Participants who identify as Black/African American; Adolescents (12-17 years); Comorbid diagnosis of mild to moderate COPD; Significant smoking history (≥10 pack-years of smoking).
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Rate of Asthma Exacerbations Associated With Hospitalizations (Subgroups of Participants)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Rate of asthma exacerbations associated with hospitalization over 52 weeks before [baseline period (BP)] and after initiation of tezepelumab [study period (SP)] was assessed in the following subgroups of participants: BEC ≥300 cells/µL; BEC <300 cells/µL; With a clinically-relevant allergy to perennial aeroallergen; Without a clinically-relevant allergy to perennial aeroallergen; Participants who identify as Black/African American; Adolescents (12-17 years); Comorbid diagnosis of mild to moderate COPD; Significant smoking history (≥10 pack-years of smoking).
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Rate of Asthma Exacerbations Associated With Emergency Department/Urgent Care (ED/UC) Visits (Subgroups of Participants)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Rate of asthma exacerbations associated with ED/UC visits over 52 weeks before [baseline period (BP)] and after initiation of tezepelumab [study period (SP)] was assessed in following subgroups of participants: BEC ≥300 cells/µL; BEC <300 cells/µL; With a clinically-relevant allergy to perennial aeroallergen; Without a clinically-relevant allergy to perennial aeroallergen; Participants who identify as Black/African American; Adolescents (12-17 years); Comorbid diagnosis of mild to moderate COPD; Significant smoking history (≥10 pack-years of smoking).
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Rate of Asthma Exacerbations Associated With Hospitalizations or ED/UC Visits (Subgroups of Participants)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Rate of asthma exacerbations associated with hospitalizations or ED/UC visits over 52 weeks before [baseline period (BP)] and after initiation of tezepelumab [study period (SP)] was assessed in following subgroups of participants: BEC ≥300 cells/µL; BEC <300 cells/µL; With clinically-relevant allergy to perennial aeroallergen; Without clinically-relevant allergy to perennial aeroallergen; Participants who identify as Black/African American; Adolescents (12-17 years); Comorbid diagnosis of mild to moderate COPD; Significant smoking history (≥10 pack-years of smoking).
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Number and Type of Asthma-related HRU (Subgroups of Participants)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Number of participants with specific type of asthma related HRU in the 12-month period before [baseline period (BP)] and after initiation of tezepelumab [up to study Week 52 = study period (SP)] were assessed in the following subgroups of participants: BEC ≥300 cells/microliter; BEC <300 cells/microliter; With a clinically-relevant allergy to a perennial aeroallergen; Without a clinically-relevant allergy to a perennial aeroallergen; Participants who identify as Black/African American; Adolescents (12-17 years); Comorbid diagnosis of mild to moderate COPD; Significant smoking history (≥10 pack-years of smoking). FEIA = Fluorescent enzyme immunoassay |
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
|
Duration of Asthma-related Hospitalizations (Subgroups of Participants)
Zeitfenster: Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Duration of asthma-related hospitalization in 12-month period before [baseline period (BP)] and after initiation of tezepelumab [up to study Week 52 = study period (SP)] was assessed in following subgroups of participants: BEC≥300 cells/µL; BEC<300 cells/µL; With clinically-relevant allergy to perennial aeroallergen; Without clinically-relevant allergy to perennial aeroallergen; Participants who identify as Black/African American; Adolescents (12-17 years); Comorbid diagnosis of mild to moderate COPD; Significant smoking history (≥10 pack-years of smoking).
|
Baseline period (Week -52 to Week 0), Study period (Week 0 to Week 52)
|
Andere Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events That Lead to Tezepelumab Treatment Discontinuation (DAEs), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Zeitfenster: Up to Week 52
|
The safety and tolerability of tezepelumab were assessed.
Data for adverse events on-treatment period have been presented.
|
Up to Week 52
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Mitarbeiter
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Njira Lugogo., MD., University of Michigan Health. Michigan, USA
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Lugogo NL, Akuthota P, Sumino K, Mathur SK, Burnette AF, Lindsley AW, Llanos JP, Marchese C, Ambrose CS, Emmanuel B. Effectiveness and Safety of Tezepelumab in a Diverse Population of US Patients with Severe Asthma: Initial Results of the PASSAGE Study. Adv Ther. 2025 Jul;42(7):3334-3353. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03231-6. Epub 2025 May 19.
- Lugogo NL, Akuthota P, Sumino K, Burnette AF, Mathur SK, Lindsley AW, Llanos JP, Marchese C, Ambrose CS, Emmanuel B. Tezepelumab in Real-World U.S. Patients with Severe Asthma Across Phenotypes and Underrepresented Populations: The Phase 4 PASSAGE Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2026 May 18:aamag225. doi: 10.1093/ajrccm/aamag225. Online ahead of print.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- D5180C00032
- 2026-000081-25 (EudraCT-Nummer)
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
Qualifizierte Forscher können über das Anfrageportal Zugang zu anonymisierten individuellen Patientendaten aus von der AstraZeneca-Unternehmensgruppe gesponserten klinischen Studien anfordern. Alle Anfragen werden gemäß der AZ-Offenlegungsverpflichtung bewertet:
https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Ja, zeigt an, dass AZ Anfragen für IPD akzeptiert, aber das bedeutet nicht, dass alle Anfragen geteilt werden.
IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen
IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien
Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen
- STUDIENPROTOKOLL
- SAFT
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .