Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Une étude pour évaluer l'efficacité et l'innocuité d'ABC008 pour la myosite à inclusions

8 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Abcuro, Inc.

Une étude de phase II/III randomisée, en double aveugle, contrôlée par placebo et multicentrique pour évaluer l'efficacité et l'innocuité d'ABC008 dans le traitement de sujets atteints de myosite à inclusions

A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis Detailed Description: A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis Detailed Description: This is a Phase II/III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel multicenter study with 3 parts.

The study will include a sentinel cohort (Part A) of 30 subjects who will receive first three doses of the study drug. Safety data from subjects in the sentinel cohorts will be evaluated by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) before further dosing of the sentinel cohort, as well as initiation of enrollment in the double-blind safety and efficacy cohort (Part B). After completion of Part A or Part B, subjects have the option of enrolling in an open-label long-term extension study or progressing to the pharmacodynamics (PD) recovery cohort (Part C), to evaluate the recovery of the depletion of killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1)+ cells after the end of treatment with ABC008.

Efficacy, safety, HRQoL, and HRU assessments will be conducted. Blood samples will be obtained to evaluate the serum PK, PD, and immunogenicity of ABC008 throughout the study.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

272

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Allemagne
      • Berlin, Allemagne, 15562
        • Krankenhaus und Poliklinik Rüdersdorf GmbH
      • Düsseldorf, Allemagne, 40225
        • University Hosptial Duesseldorf
  • Australie
    • New South Wales
      • Saint Leonards, New South Wales, Australie, 2065
        • Royal North Shore Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Herston, Queensland, Australie, 4006
        • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
    • Western Australia
      • Nedlands, Western Australia, Australie, 6009
        • Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science
  • Belgique
      • Ghent, Belgique, 9000
        • AZ Sint-Lucas & Volkskliniek
  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 3M 1M4
        • Heritage Medical Research Clinic - University of Calgary
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3T2
        • Genge Partners Inc.
  • France
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Hospital Pitie-Salpetriere - AP-HP
  • Royaume-Uni
      • London, Royaume-Uni, WC1N 3BG
        • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN)
      • Salford, Royaume-Uni, M6 8HD
        • Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
  • États-Unis
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, États-Unis, 85028
        • Neuromuscular Research Center
    • California
      • Irvine, California, États-Unis, 92868
        • University of California Irvine Medical Center (UCIMC) - Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Neuromuscular Center
      • Los Angeles, California, États-Unis, 90095
        • UCLA Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, États-Unis, 90033
        • Keck Hosptial of USC
      • Palo Alto, California, États-Unis, 94304
        • Stanford Neuroscience Medical Center
      • San Francisco, California, États-Unis, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, États-Unis, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital Anschutz Outpatient Pavillion
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, États-Unis, 06519
        • Yale School of Medicine
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, États-Unis, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, États-Unis, 60611
        • Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Department of Neurology (Clinic)
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, États-Unis, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, États-Unis, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
      • Baltimore, Maryland, États-Unis, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02114
        • Neuromuscular Diagnostic Center - Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 021158
        • Brigham and Womens Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, États-Unis, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, États-Unis, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, États-Unis, 98198
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, États-Unis, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
      • New York, New York, États-Unis, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center / The Neurological Institute of New York
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, États-Unis, 27710
        • Duke Neurological Disorders Clinic -1L
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, États-Unis, 27157
        • Wake Forrest School of Medicine
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, États-Unis, 44106
        • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
      • Columbus, Ohio, États-Unis, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, États-Unis, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 17033
        • Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 15213
        • UPMC Arthritis and Autoimmunity Center, Falk Clinic
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, États-Unis, 78759
        • Austin Neuromuscular Center
      • Dallas, Texas, États-Unis, 75206
        • Texas Neurology
      • Houston, Texas, États-Unis, 77030
        • Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
    • Virginia
      • Henrico, Virginia, États-Unis, 23233
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, États-Unis, 98195
        • University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, États-Unis, 53226
        • Medical College of Wisconsin

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

40 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult males and females age >40 years at the time of the first dose of study medication;
  • Weight >40 and <150 kg;
  • Diagnosis of either clinico-pathologically defined IBM, clinically defined IBM, or probable IBM according to the European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) IBM 2011 research diagnostic criteria (Rose et al., 2013). Documented histopathology results must be available prior to Baseline (Day 1) to confirm eligibility;
  • Able to arise from a chair (with armrests), with use of their arms but without support from another person or device (e.g., cane, walking stick), at Screening and Baseline (Day 1);
  • Able to walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down, with or without assistive device. Once arisen from the chair, subject may use any walking device but cannot be supported by another person, furniture, or a wall;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other form of myositis or myopathy other than IBM, e.g., metabolic or drug-induced myopathy, drug-induced myositis, anti-synthetase syndrome, polymyositis or dermatomyositis, cancer-associated myositis (myositis diagnosed within 3 years, either before or after), myositis in overlap with another autoimmune disease (e.g., systemic lupus, systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis), or muscular dystrophy;
  • Any condition, e.g., severe degenerative arthritis with limited range of motion, which precludes the ability to quantitate muscle strength or perform functional assessments (e.g., mTUG), in the Investigator's opinion;.
  • Presence of another autoimmune or autoinflammatory disease other than indication under study, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthropathy, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus. Subjects with Sjogren's syndrome, T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia (T-LGLL), or well-controlled thyroid disease are permitted;

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Quadruple

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: 0.5 mg/kg ABC008

Part A - ABC008 N=12

Part B - ABC008 N= 67
Médicament: ABC008

Given by subcutaneous injection
Comparateur actif: 2.0 mg/kg ABC008

Part A - ABC008 N=12

Part B - ABC008 N= 67
Médicament: ABC008

Given by subcutaneous injection
Comparateur placebo: Placebo

Part A - Placebo N= 6

Part B - Placebo N= 67
Médicament: ABC008

Given by subcutaneous injection

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Délai: Up to Week 80

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug.
Up to Week 80
Part A: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity
Délai: Up to Week 80

A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and was graded by severity per protocol-specified Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria: Grade 1, Mild (asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated); Grade 2, Moderate (minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limited age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL)); Grade 3, Severe or medically significant (medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care ADL); Grade 4, Life-threatening (threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated); and Grade 5, Death (death related to an AE).
Up to Week 80
Part A: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug
Délai: Up to Week 80

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug. An AE with missing relationship to study drug was considered as related to study drug.
Up to Week 80
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS) Total Score at Week 76
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 76

The IBMFRS was used as an ordinal rating scale to determine participant's assessments of their capabilities. It included 10 measures (swallowing, handwriting, cutting food and handling utensils, fine motor tasks, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed and adjusting covers, changing position from sitting to standing, walking, and climbing stairs) graded on a Likert scale (a psychometric tool) from 0 (being unable to perform) to 4 (normal). The sum of the 10 items provided a value between 0 and 40, with a higher score representing less functional limitation or better functional status. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 76
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs
Délai: Day 1 to Week 80

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug.
Day 1 to Week 80
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity
Délai: Day 1 to Week 80

A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and was graded by severity per protocol-specified CTCAE criteria: Grade 1, Mild (asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated); Grade 2, Moderate (minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limited age-appropriate instrumental ADL); Grade 3, Severe or medically significant (medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care ADL); Grade 4, Life-threatening (threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated); and Grade 5, Death (death related to an AE).
Day 1 to Week 80
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug
Délai: Day 1 to Week 80

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug. An AE with missing relationship to study drug was considered as related to study drug.
Day 1 to Week 80
Part B: Mean Change From Baseline in the IBMFRS Total Score at Week 76
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) and Up to Week 76

The IBMFRS was used as an ordinal rating scale to determine participant's assessments of their capabilities. It included 10 measures (swallowing, handwriting, cutting food and handling utensils, fine motor tasks, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed and adjusting covers, changing position from sitting to standing, walking, and climbing stairs) graded on a Likert scale (a psychometric tool) from 0 (being unable to perform) to 4 (normal). The sum of the 10 items provided a value between 0 and 40, with a higher score representing less functional limitation or better functional status. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) and Up to Week 76
Part C: Time to PD Recovery
Délai: Up to Week 24

Recovery was defined as the return of KLRG1+ cell counts toward baseline levels during the PD follow-up period.
Up to Week 24

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Délai: Up to Week 80

A TESAE was defined as a serious AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and met seriousness criteria per protocol (including death, life-threatening event, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or other medically important event).
Up to Week 80
Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs With Onset Within 24 Hours From the Start of Any Study Medication Administration
Délai: Within 24 hours following each dose, Up to Week 80

A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug, with onset assessed within 24 hours following the dosing.
Within 24 hours following each dose, Up to Week 80
Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation
Délai: Up to Week 80

A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug that led to discontinuation of study.
Up to Week 80
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Absolute Neutrophil Count, Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Absolute Neutrophil Count, Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocytes
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Erythrocytes. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hematocrit
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Hematocrit. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aldolase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Lactate Dehydrogenase, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: ALT, Aldolase, AST, GGT and Lactate Dehydrogenase. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Albumin and Protein
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters Albumin and Protein. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alkaline Phosphatase and Creatine Kinase (CK)
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters Alkaline Phosphatase and CK. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, and Urea. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter - pH
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Urine samples were collected for the analysis of Urinalysis parameter: pH. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter- Specific Gravity
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Urine samples were collected for the analysis of Urinalysis parameters- specific gravity. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - C3 and C4
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of complement parameters included C3 and C4. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - Hemolytic Complement Filtration (CH50)
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of complement parameter- hemolytic complement filtration (CH50). Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in C Reactive Protein (CRP)
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameter- CRP. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
Délai: Up to Week 76

Vital signs were planned to be measured after 5 minutes of rest and taken in the same position throughout the study. Vital signs included blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and respiration rate. Clinically significant changes in vital signs were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for abnormal values (or clinically significant worsening from baseline) as determined by the Investigator.
Up to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Triplicate 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Changes in ECG parameters were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for change from baseline values as determined by the Investigator. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-baseline visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

Triplicate 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Changes in ECG parameters were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for change from baseline values as determined by the Investigator. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
Délai: Up to Week 80

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant partaking in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. AESIs included injection site reactions, systemic injection reactions (e.g., hypersensitivity, systemic inflammatory response), and infection.
Up to Week 80
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Manual Muscle Testing - 12 (MMT-12) Score at Week 76
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

Manual Muscle Testing - 12 assessed the muscle strength across the muscle groups that included neck flexion and both right and left shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, elbow extension, wrist extension, wrist flexion, flexor pollicis longus, hip flexors, hip abduction, hip extension, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. Scores were calculated by summing the outcomes, with the Investigator providing the score, on a scale of 0 (no contraction) to 5 (normal strength), which is then converted by a standard procedure to a Kendall score equivalent on a scale of 0 to 10. Individual scores are summed to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 60. A higher score reflects better muscle strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Hand Grip Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

Grip strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer which provided a precise measurement of the force that a muscle can exert and reflects muscle strength of the hand. Positive values indicated increased grip strength and negative values indicated decreased grip strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Quadriceps Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

Quadriceps strength was measured using a dynamometer which provided the applied force of leg extension and reflects muscle strength of the dominant leg. Positive values indicated increased strength and negative values indicated decreased strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Timed Up and Go Test (mTUG) at Week 76
Délai: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

The mTUG assessed functional mobility by measuring the time required for a participant to rise from a standard armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down (assistive devices permitted after standing, but no support from a caregiver, or a wall). Negative values indicated faster performance and positive values indicated slower performance. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Abcuro, Inc.

Collaborateurs

Syneos Health

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Liens utiles

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

28 février 2023

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

6 novembre 2025

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

27 novembre 2025

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

1 février 2023

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

1 février 2023

Première publication (Réel)

10 février 2023

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

1 octobre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

8 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • ABC008-IBM-201

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner