- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT04248725
Telehealth Pain Self-Management for Employed Adults (E-TIPS)
Efficacy of a Telehealth Pain Self-Management Intervention in Employed Adults With Physical Disability: A Randomized Controlled Trial
연구 개요
상세 설명
Chronic pain is one of the most prevalent, disabling, and persistent comorbid conditions associated with physical disabilities, including limb loss, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and chronic neurodegenerative conditions such as multiple sclerosis. One half to two-thirds of adults with these conditions experience chronic pain. In addition to being associated with disability, depression, sleep disruption, and physical inactivity, chronic pain has deleterious social and societal costs, including job loss and reliance on long-term disability programs.
The E-TIPS intervention aims to address common barriers encountered by employed individuals with chronic pain. People with physical disabilities may be offered face-to-face delivery of pain self-management interventions, in clinical settings during business hours, which limits access to people with physical disabilities who are employed. These individuals must take time off work to attend multiple treatment sessions, overcome transportation difficulties, and contend with the stigma of seeking behavioral healthcare. Telehealth interventions, such as E-TIPS, have considerable potential for expanding the reach of pain self-management interventions for employed people with physical disabilities.
The proposed randomized (1:1), single-blind parallel-group trial will compare the E-TIPS telehealth pain self-management intervention to a waitlist control in adults with physical disabilities and chronic pain who are employed. Outcomes will be assessed before randomization, mid-treatment (6 weeks post-randomization), post-treatment (10 weeks post-randomization; primary endpoint), and 6-month follow up (25 weeks post-randomization). Participants will be recruited from across the US, including at University of Washington (UW) and Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (SRALab).
연구 유형
등록 (예상)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: Carolyn C Green
- 전화번호: 206-616-9801
- 이메일: tipsstudy@uw.edu
연구 장소
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, 미국, 98104
- 모병
- University of Washington
-
연락하다:
- Carolyn Green, BFA
- 전화번호: 206-616-9801
- 이메일: tipsstudy@uw.edu
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Self-reported physical disability
- Chronic pain defined as daily pain of ≥ 3 months duration and ≥ 3 average pain intensity in the past week on a 0-10 numerical rating scale
- Experiences pain for more than 45 out of the past 90 days (defined as 50% of the time or greater)
- Reads, speaks, and understands English
- Has access to and is able to communicate over the telephone with our without assistive devices
- Is employed, working 15-20 hours per week or more, on average, or earning in excess of substantial gainful activity (approximately $1200/month)
We will enroll individuals with a range of physical disabilities to maximize the generalizability of the results, because there is no evidence that the type of disability affects responsiveness to the proposed treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under the age of 18
- Cannot read, speak, or understand English
- No self-reported physical disability
- Currently unemployed
- Plans to retire or leave employment within the study period
- Working fewer than 15-20 hours per week, on average, and earning less than approximately $1200 per month
- Cannot communicate or complete assessments over the phone or internet
- Chronic pain defined as daily pain of ≤ 3 months duration and ≤ 3 average pain intensity in the past week on a 0-10 numerical rating scale
- Experiences pain for fewer than 45 out of the past 90 days (defined as 50% of the time or less)
- Currently participating in another pain study or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) study
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
---|---|
실험적: E-TIPS
The E-TIPS intervention is based upon a cognitive-behavioral intervention for pain that was developed for and shown to be effective in people with chronic pain and a physical disability such as the conditions of interest in this study.
Eight, 45-minute telephone sessions will be delivered by a clinician.
A patient workbook will be used to facilitate skill acquisition and rehearsal in and outside of sessions.
The intervention includes education about the role of unhelpful thoughts, particularly pain catastrophizing, and unhelpful pain coping behaviors; instruction in how to identify and change unhelpful or negative thinking about pain; utilization of helpful coping strategies; relaxation techniques; behavioral activation including setting goals for physical activation, activity pacing and scheduling; and coping with pain flare-ups.
Each session includes a brief relaxation exercise.
Participants receive digital audio recordings of relaxation exercises to practice at home.
|
Chronic pain self-management strategies for employed individuals with physical disabilities
|
간섭 없음: Usual care
Participants assigned to the control intervention will continue to pursue standard care (a waitlist).
Waitlist control subjects will be offered the opportunity to receive the intervention following completion of the final 6-month follow up outcome assessment.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
---|---|---|
Change in pain interference
기간: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks (post-treatment),and 38 week (6-month follow up) post-randomization
|
Patient-reported pain interference using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Scale-6-item.
Each item is scored 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), yielding a raw score between 6 and 30, which is converted to a standard t-score.
Higher scores indicate greater self-reported pain interference.
|
Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks (post-treatment),and 38 week (6-month follow up) post-randomization
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
---|---|---|
Change in pain self-efficacy
기간: Baseline (week 0), 10 weeks (post-treatment),and 25 week (6-month follow up) post-randomization
|
Patient-reported pain self-efficacy for managing pain using the University of Washington Pain Self-Efficacy Scale-6 item.
Each item is scored 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), yielding a raw score between 6 and 30, which is converted to a standard t-score.
Higher scores indicate greater patient-reported self-efficacy for managing pain.
|
Baseline (week 0), 10 weeks (post-treatment),and 25 week (6-month follow up) post-randomization
|
Change in average pain intensity
기간: Baseline (week 0), 10 weeks (post-treatment),and 25 week (6-month follow up) post-randomization
|
0-10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale of average pain intensity in past week (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable).
Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-reported pain intensity.
|
Baseline (week 0), 10 weeks (post-treatment),and 25 week (6-month follow up) post-randomization
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Dawn M Ehde, PhD, University of Washington
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- Ehde DM, Dillworth TM, Turner JA. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain: efficacy, innovations, and directions for research. Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):153-66. doi: 10.1037/a0035747.
- O'Connor AB, Schwid SR, Herrmann DN, Markman JD, Dworkin RH. Pain associated with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and proposed classification. Pain. 2008 Jul;137(1):96-111. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.024. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
- Alschuler KN, Ehde DM, Jensen MP. The co-occurrence of pain and depression in adults with multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2013 May;58(2):217-21. doi: 10.1037/a0032008.
- Clarke G, Yarborough BJ. Evaluating the promise of health IT to enhance/expand the reach of mental health services. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 May 20.
- Ehde DM, Jensen MP, Engel JM, Turner JA, Hoffman AJ, Cardenas DD. Chronic pain secondary to disability: a review. Clin J Pain. 2003 Jan-Feb;19(1):3-17. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200301000-00002.
- Dijkers M, Bryce T, Zanca J. Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(1):13-29.
- Ehde DM, Czerniecki JM, Smith DG, Campbell KM, Edwards WT, Jensen MP, Robinson LR. Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Aug;81(8):1039-44. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.7583.
- Krause JS, Cao Y, Clark JMR. Pain Intensity, Interference, and Medication Use After Spinal Cord Injury: Association With Risk of Mortality After Controlling for Socioeconomic and Other Health Factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;98(12):2464-2470. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
- Negre-Pages L, Regragui W, Bouhassira D, Grandjean H, Rascol O; DoPaMiP Study Group. Chronic pain in Parkinson's disease: the cross-sectional French DoPaMiP survey. Mov Disord. 2008 Jul 30;23(10):1361-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.22142.
- Franklin GM, Wickizer TM, Coe NB, Fulton-Kehoe D. Workers' compensation: poor quality health care and the growing disability problem in the United States. Am J Ind Med. 2015 Mar;58(3):245-51. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22399. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
- Kroenke K, Wu J, Bair MJ, Krebs EE, Damush TM, Tu W. Reciprocal relationship between pain and depression: a 12-month longitudinal analysis in primary care. J Pain. 2011 Sep;12(9):964-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
- Anand P, Ben-Shalom Y. The promise of better economic outcomes for workers with musculoskeletal conditions. Roosevelt House: Public Policy Institute at Hunter College.2017.
- Social Security Administration. Annual Statistical Report on the Social Security Disability Insurance Program, 2015. Washington, DC2016.
- Warms CA, Turner JA, Marshall HM, Cardenas DD. Treatments for chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: many are tried, few are helpful. Clin J Pain. 2002 May-Jun;18(3):154-63. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200205000-00004.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (예상)
연구 완료 (예상)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- STUDY00005686
- 7258 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: DHHS)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
IPD 공유 기간
IPD 공유 액세스 기준
Data will be stored in a manner that enables retrieval and use at no cost to users. Each data set will use a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for future reference and citation. Data submitted to ICPSR, will fit within the scope of the ICPSR Collection Development Policy found at this site: https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/datamanagement/policies/colldev.html.
ICPSR will make the research data from this project available to the broader social science research community. These files, in which direct and indirect identifiers have been removed to minimize disclosure risk, will be accessible directly through the ICPSR Web site. After agreeing to Terms of Use, users with an ICPSR MyData account may download the data at no cost.
IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형
- 연구_프로토콜
- 수액
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
다발성 경화증에 대한 임상 시험
-
University Hospital, Montpellier종료됨제1형 당뇨병 | Basal-bolus multiple-dily 인슐린 주사 | 인슐린 펌프(CSII)프랑스
E-TIPS에 대한 임상 시험
-
University College, LondonUniversity College London Hospitals알려지지 않은
-
Medical College of WisconsinSiemens Medical Solutions완전한
-
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and...완전한
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France모병
-
University of Illinois at Chicago모병
-
West China HospitalBeijing YouAn Hospital; Guangzhou First People's Hospital; Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University 그리고 다른 협력자들아직 모집하지 않음문맥 고혈압 | 문맥전신 단락 | 위정맥류 출혈