아동 옹호 센터의 팀 중심 구현
농촌아동권익옹호센터의 소아 외상성 스트레스에 대한 케어 프로세스 모델의 구현: 팀 중심 구현의 파일럿 테스트
Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) are well-positioned to identify children at risk for mental health problems and to facilitate access to evidence-based treatments. Implementation of standardized mental health screening and referral protocols may improve recognition of mental health needs and facilitate treatment engagement. Implementation strategies that improve teamwork may enhance implementation outcomes in team-based settings like CACs. In this study, CACs will implement the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS) and be randomized to either team-focused implementation or standard implementation. The study aims are to evaluate the feasibility of team-focused implementation and the effect of the CPM-PTS on caregiver understanding of mental health needs and intentions to initiate treatment.
연구 개요
상세 설명
This study is a pilot cluster randomized controlled hybrid Type II effectiveness-implementation trial in 4 rural Child Advocacy Centers. All CACs will implement the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS), a mental health screening and referral protocol. CACs will be randomized to team-focused implementation (n = 2) or standard implementation (n = 2). The study is designed to evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of team-focused implementation strategies. It will also test the effect of the CPM-PTS on caregiver understanding of mental health needs and intentions to initiate treatment. Mixed methods will be used to evaluate the feasibility of team-focused implementation, test the effect of team strategies on teamwork, and assess implementation outcomes. Administrative data collected anonymously from caregivers will be used to test the effectiveness of the CPM-PTS.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 미국, 15213
- University of Pittsburgh
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individuals at least 18 years of age who are members of the multidisciplinary team at the participating CACs.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years old.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: 팀 중심 구현
|
CACs randomized to the experimental condition (n = 2) will participate in team-focused implementation. They will receive team development interventions (e.g., goal-setting exercise, training in communication skills) integrated with standard CPM-PTS training and technical assistance strategies. |
|
활성 비교기: 표준 구현
|
CACs randomized to the comparison condition (n = 2) will receive standard training and technical assistance strategies to support CPM-PTS implementation. They will receive CPM-PTS materials (e.g., manual, REDCap surveys, referral protocols), an interactive training, and six months of technical assistance. |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
기간: Month 6
|
Perceived acceptability of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
Acceptability of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
기간: Month 12
|
Perceived acceptability of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
Appropriateness of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
기간: Month 6
|
Perceived appropriateness of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
Appropriateness of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
기간: Month 12
|
Perceived appropriateness of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
Feasibility of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
기간: Month 6
|
Perceived feasibility of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
Feasibility of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
기간: Month 12
|
Perceived feasibility of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Team Functioning (Learning Behavior) From Baseline to 6-month Follow-up
기간: Baseline, month 6
|
Affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes and states will be assessed with survey items rated on Likert scales. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more adaptive team functioning (range 1-7). Learning behavior was assessed with 3 items. |
Baseline, month 6
|
|
Change in Team Functioning (Learning Behavior) From Baseline to 12-month Follow-up
기간: Baseline, month 12
|
Affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes and states will be assessed with survey items rated on Likert scales. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more adaptive team functioning (range 1-7). Learning behavior was assessed with 3 items. |
Baseline, month 12
|
|
Change in Team Performance From Baseline to 6- and 12-month Follow-up
기간: Baseline, month 6, month 12
|
The overall quality of work done by the team will be assessed with 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate better performance (range 1-5). |
Baseline, month 6, month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Acceptability Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
기간: Month 6
|
Perceived acceptability of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
CPM-PTS Acceptability Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
기간: Month 12
|
Perceived acceptability of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Appropriateness Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
기간: Month 6
|
Perceived appropriateness of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
CPM-PTS Appropriateness Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
기간: Month 12
|
Perceived appropriateness of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Feasibility Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
기간: Month 6
|
Perceived feasibility of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
CPM-PTS Feasibility Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
기간: Month 12
|
Perceived feasibility of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Adoption
기간: From start of the study for up to 12 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
Adoption will be indicated by the number of days from training to the first completed screening. |
From start of the study for up to 12 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
|
CPM-PTS Reach
기간: Monthly for 9 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
Reach will be indicated by screening rates (i.e., completed screenings / eligible children) and calculated for monthly and quarterly periods (possible range 0-100%). Reported below are the average monthly screening rate over 9 months (all available data) and the average quarterly screening rate across 3 quarters (all available data). |
Monthly for 9 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Caregiver Understanding of Mental Health Needs
기간: Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
Caregivers will rate 1 item assessing their understanding of their child's mental health needs on a 4-point Likert scale (range 1-4) in an anonymous end of visit survey. |
Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
|
Caregiver Intention to Initiate Mental Health Services
기간: Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
Caregivers will rate 1 item assessing their intention to initiate mental health services for their child on a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5) in an anonymous end of visit survey. |
Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Elizabeth McGuier, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
Deidentified data will be available upon reasonable request as allowed by IRB regulations and after manuscripts reporting the main findings are accepted for publication.
IPD 공유 기간
Data will be available after manuscripts reporting the main findings are accepted for publication.
IPD 공유 액세스 기준
Contact the principal investigator to request access to the deidentified data.
IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형
- 연구_프로토콜
- 수액
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .