Ryhmäkeskeinen käyttöönotto lastenneuvontakeskuksissa
Lasten traumaattisen stressin hoitoprosessimallin käyttöönotto maaseudun lastensuojelukeskuksissa: tiimikeskeisen toteutuksen pilottitesti
Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) are well-positioned to identify children at risk for mental health problems and to facilitate access to evidence-based treatments. Implementation of standardized mental health screening and referral protocols may improve recognition of mental health needs and facilitate treatment engagement. Implementation strategies that improve teamwork may enhance implementation outcomes in team-based settings like CACs. In this study, CACs will implement the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS) and be randomized to either team-focused implementation or standard implementation. The study aims are to evaluate the feasibility of team-focused implementation and the effect of the CPM-PTS on caregiver understanding of mental health needs and intentions to initiate treatment.
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Tila
Ehdot
Interventio / Hoito
Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus
This study is a pilot cluster randomized controlled hybrid Type II effectiveness-implementation trial in 4 rural Child Advocacy Centers. All CACs will implement the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS), a mental health screening and referral protocol. CACs will be randomized to team-focused implementation (n = 2) or standard implementation (n = 2). The study is designed to evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of team-focused implementation strategies. It will also test the effect of the CPM-PTS on caregiver understanding of mental health needs and intentions to initiate treatment. Mixed methods will be used to evaluate the feasibility of team-focused implementation, test the effect of team strategies on teamwork, and assess implementation outcomes. Administrative data collected anonymously from caregivers will be used to test the effectiveness of the CPM-PTS.
Opintotyyppi
Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)
Vaihe
- Ei sovellettavissa
Yhteystiedot ja paikat
Opiskelupaikat
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Yhdysvallat, 15213
- University of Pittsburgh
-
-
Osallistumiskriteerit
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Sukupuolet, jotka voivat opiskella
Kuvaus
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individuals at least 18 years of age who are members of the multidisciplinary team at the participating CACs.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years old.
Opintosuunnitelma
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
- Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Terveyspalvelututkimus
- Jako: Satunnaistettu
- Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
- Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)
Aseet ja interventiot
Osallistujaryhmä / Arm |
Interventio / Hoito |
|---|---|
|
Kokeellinen: Ryhmäkeskeinen toteutus
|
CACs randomized to the experimental condition (n = 2) will participate in team-focused implementation. They will receive team development interventions (e.g., goal-setting exercise, training in communication skills) integrated with standard CPM-PTS training and technical assistance strategies. |
|
Active Comparator: Vakiototeutus
|
CACs randomized to the comparison condition (n = 2) will receive standard training and technical assistance strategies to support CPM-PTS implementation. They will receive CPM-PTS materials (e.g., manual, REDCap surveys, referral protocols), an interactive training, and six months of technical assistance. |
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 6
|
Perceived acceptability of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
Acceptability of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 12
|
Perceived acceptability of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
Appropriateness of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 6
|
Perceived appropriateness of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
Appropriateness of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 12
|
Perceived appropriateness of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
Feasibility of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 6
|
Perceived feasibility of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
Feasibility of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 12
|
Perceived feasibility of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Team Functioning (Learning Behavior) From Baseline to 6-month Follow-up
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, month 6
|
Affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes and states will be assessed with survey items rated on Likert scales. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more adaptive team functioning (range 1-7). Learning behavior was assessed with 3 items. |
Baseline, month 6
|
|
Change in Team Functioning (Learning Behavior) From Baseline to 12-month Follow-up
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, month 12
|
Affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes and states will be assessed with survey items rated on Likert scales. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more adaptive team functioning (range 1-7). Learning behavior was assessed with 3 items. |
Baseline, month 12
|
|
Change in Team Performance From Baseline to 6- and 12-month Follow-up
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, month 6, month 12
|
The overall quality of work done by the team will be assessed with 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate better performance (range 1-5). |
Baseline, month 6, month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Acceptability Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 6
|
Perceived acceptability of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
CPM-PTS Acceptability Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 12
|
Perceived acceptability of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Appropriateness Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 6
|
Perceived appropriateness of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
CPM-PTS Appropriateness Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 12
|
Perceived appropriateness of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Feasibility Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 6
|
Perceived feasibility of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
CPM-PTS Feasibility Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Aikaikkuna: Month 12
|
Perceived feasibility of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Adoption
Aikaikkuna: From start of the study for up to 12 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
Adoption will be indicated by the number of days from training to the first completed screening. |
From start of the study for up to 12 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
|
CPM-PTS Reach
Aikaikkuna: Monthly for 9 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
Reach will be indicated by screening rates (i.e., completed screenings / eligible children) and calculated for monthly and quarterly periods (possible range 0-100%). Reported below are the average monthly screening rate over 9 months (all available data) and the average quarterly screening rate across 3 quarters (all available data). |
Monthly for 9 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
Muut tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Caregiver Understanding of Mental Health Needs
Aikaikkuna: Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
Caregivers will rate 1 item assessing their understanding of their child's mental health needs on a 4-point Likert scale (range 1-4) in an anonymous end of visit survey. |
Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
|
Caregiver Intention to Initiate Mental Health Services
Aikaikkuna: Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
Caregivers will rate 1 item assessing their intention to initiate mental health services for their child on a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5) in an anonymous end of visit survey. |
Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Sponsori
Yhteistyökumppanit
Tutkijat
- Päätutkija: Elizabeth McGuier, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)
Opintojen valmistuminen (Todellinen)
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Avainsanat
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- STUDY21010070
- K23MH123729 (Yhdysvaltain NIH-apuraha/sopimus)
Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)
Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?
IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus
Deidentified data will be available upon reasonable request as allowed by IRB regulations and after manuscripts reporting the main findings are accepted for publication.
IPD-jaon aikakehys
Data will be available after manuscripts reporting the main findings are accepted for publication.
IPD-jaon käyttöoikeuskriteerit
Contact the principal investigator to request access to the deidentified data.
IPD-jakamista tukeva tietotyyppi
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- MAHLA
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .