Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Implementazione incentrata sul team nei centri di difesa dei minori

4 ottobre 2026 aggiornato da: Elizabeth McGuier, University of Pittsburgh

Attuazione del modello di processo di cura per lo stress traumatico pediatrico nei centri rurali di difesa dei bambini: un test pilota di implementazione incentrata sul team

Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) are well-positioned to identify children at risk for mental health problems and to facilitate access to evidence-based treatments. Implementation of standardized mental health screening and referral protocols may improve recognition of mental health needs and facilitate treatment engagement. Implementation strategies that improve teamwork may enhance implementation outcomes in team-based settings like CACs. In this study, CACs will implement the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS) and be randomized to either team-focused implementation or standard implementation. The study aims are to evaluate the feasibility of team-focused implementation and the effect of the CPM-PTS on caregiver understanding of mental health needs and intentions to initiate treatment.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

This study is a pilot cluster randomized controlled hybrid Type II effectiveness-implementation trial in 4 rural Child Advocacy Centers. All CACs will implement the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS), a mental health screening and referral protocol. CACs will be randomized to team-focused implementation (n = 2) or standard implementation (n = 2). The study is designed to evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of team-focused implementation strategies. It will also test the effect of the CPM-PTS on caregiver understanding of mental health needs and intentions to initiate treatment. Mixed methods will be used to evaluate the feasibility of team-focused implementation, test the effect of team strategies on teamwork, and assess implementation outcomes. Administrative data collected anonymously from caregivers will be used to test the effectiveness of the CPM-PTS.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

147

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Stati Uniti
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals at least 18 years of age who are members of the multidisciplinary team at the participating CACs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years old.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Implementazione incentrata sul team
Comportamentale: Team-focused Implementation

CACs randomized to the experimental condition (n = 2) will participate in team-focused implementation. They will receive team development interventions (e.g., goal-setting exercise, training in communication skills) integrated with standard CPM-PTS training and technical assistance strategies.
Comparatore attivo: Implementazione standard
Comportamentale: Standard Implementation

CACs randomized to the comparison condition (n = 2) will receive standard training and technical assistance strategies to support CPM-PTS implementation. They will receive CPM-PTS materials (e.g., manual, REDCap surveys, referral protocols), an interactive training, and six months of technical assistance.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Acceptability of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 6

Perceived acceptability of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 6
Acceptability of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 12

Perceived acceptability of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 12
Appropriateness of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 6

Perceived appropriateness of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 6
Appropriateness of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 12

Perceived appropriateness of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 12
Feasibility of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 6

Perceived feasibility of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 6
Feasibility of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 12

Perceived feasibility of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 12

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Team Functioning (Learning Behavior) From Baseline to 6-month Follow-up
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, month 6

Affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes and states will be assessed with survey items rated on Likert scales. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more adaptive team functioning (range 1-7).

Learning behavior was assessed with 3 items.
Baseline, month 6
Change in Team Functioning (Learning Behavior) From Baseline to 12-month Follow-up
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, month 12

Affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes and states will be assessed with survey items rated on Likert scales. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more adaptive team functioning (range 1-7).

Learning behavior was assessed with 3 items.
Baseline, month 12
Change in Team Performance From Baseline to 6- and 12-month Follow-up
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, month 6, month 12

The overall quality of work done by the team will be assessed with 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate better performance (range 1-5).
Baseline, month 6, month 12
CPM-PTS Acceptability Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 6

Perceived acceptability of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 6
CPM-PTS Acceptability Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 12

Perceived acceptability of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 12
CPM-PTS Appropriateness Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 6

Perceived appropriateness of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 6
CPM-PTS Appropriateness Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 12

Perceived appropriateness of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 12
CPM-PTS Feasibility Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 6

Perceived feasibility of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 6
CPM-PTS Feasibility Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Lasso di tempo: Month 12

Perceived feasibility of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5).
Month 12
CPM-PTS Adoption
Lasso di tempo: From start of the study for up to 12 months after CPM-PTS implementation

Adoption will be indicated by the number of days from training to the first completed screening.
From start of the study for up to 12 months after CPM-PTS implementation
CPM-PTS Reach
Lasso di tempo: Monthly for 9 months after CPM-PTS implementation

Reach will be indicated by screening rates (i.e., completed screenings / eligible children) and calculated for monthly and quarterly periods (possible range 0-100%). Reported below are the average monthly screening rate over 9 months (all available data) and the average quarterly screening rate across 3 quarters (all available data).
Monthly for 9 months after CPM-PTS implementation

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Caregiver Understanding of Mental Health Needs
Lasso di tempo: Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)

Caregivers will rate 1 item assessing their understanding of their child's mental health needs on a 4-point Likert scale (range 1-4) in an anonymous end of visit survey.
Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
Caregiver Intention to Initiate Mental Health Services
Lasso di tempo: Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)

Caregivers will rate 1 item assessing their intention to initiate mental health services for their child on a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5) in an anonymous end of visit survey.
Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

University of Pittsburgh

Collaboratori

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Elizabeth McGuier, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

31 luglio 2024

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

8 ottobre 2025

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

8 ottobre 2025

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

15 dicembre 2022

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

9 gennaio 2023

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

10 gennaio 2023

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

6 ottobre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

4 ottobre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 ottobre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • STUDY21010070
  • K23MH123729 (Sovvenzione/contratto NIH degli Stati Uniti)

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

SÌ

Descrizione del piano IPD

Deidentified data will be available upon reasonable request as allowed by IRB regulations and after manuscripts reporting the main findings are accepted for publication.

Periodo di condivisione IPD

Data will be available after manuscripts reporting the main findings are accepted for publication.

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

Contact the principal investigator to request access to the deidentified data.

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA
  • ICF
  • CODICE_ANALITICO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi