儿童宣传中心以团队为中心的实施
农村儿童宣传中心儿科创伤应激护理过程模型的实施：以团队为中心的实施试点测试
Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) are well-positioned to identify children at risk for mental health problems and to facilitate access to evidence-based treatments. Implementation of standardized mental health screening and referral protocols may improve recognition of mental health needs and facilitate treatment engagement. Implementation strategies that improve teamwork may enhance implementation outcomes in team-based settings like CACs. In this study, CACs will implement the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS) and be randomized to either team-focused implementation or standard implementation. The study aims are to evaluate the feasibility of team-focused implementation and the effect of the CPM-PTS on caregiver understanding of mental health needs and intentions to initiate treatment.
研究概览
详细说明
This study is a pilot cluster randomized controlled hybrid Type II effectiveness-implementation trial in 4 rural Child Advocacy Centers. All CACs will implement the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS), a mental health screening and referral protocol. CACs will be randomized to team-focused implementation (n = 2) or standard implementation (n = 2). The study is designed to evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of team-focused implementation strategies. It will also test the effect of the CPM-PTS on caregiver understanding of mental health needs and intentions to initiate treatment. Mixed methods will be used to evaluate the feasibility of team-focused implementation, test the effect of team strategies on teamwork, and assess implementation outcomes. Administrative data collected anonymously from caregivers will be used to test the effectiveness of the CPM-PTS.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh、Pennsylvania、美国、15213
- University of Pittsburgh
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individuals at least 18 years of age who are members of the multidisciplinary team at the participating CACs.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years old.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：卫生服务研究
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：以团队为中心的实施
|
CACs randomized to the experimental condition (n = 2) will participate in team-focused implementation. They will receive team development interventions (e.g., goal-setting exercise, training in communication skills) integrated with standard CPM-PTS training and technical assistance strategies. |
|
有源比较器：标准实施
|
CACs randomized to the comparison condition (n = 2) will receive standard training and technical assistance strategies to support CPM-PTS implementation. They will receive CPM-PTS materials (e.g., manual, REDCap surveys, referral protocols), an interactive training, and six months of technical assistance. |
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
大体时间：Month 6
|
Perceived acceptability of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
Acceptability of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
大体时间：Month 12
|
Perceived acceptability of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
Appropriateness of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
大体时间：Month 6
|
Perceived appropriateness of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
Appropriateness of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
大体时间：Month 12
|
Perceived appropriateness of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
Feasibility of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
大体时间：Month 6
|
Perceived feasibility of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
Feasibility of Team-focused Implementation Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
大体时间：Month 12
|
Perceived feasibility of team-focused implementation will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Team Functioning (Learning Behavior) From Baseline to 6-month Follow-up
大体时间：Baseline, month 6
|
Affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes and states will be assessed with survey items rated on Likert scales. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more adaptive team functioning (range 1-7). Learning behavior was assessed with 3 items. |
Baseline, month 6
|
|
Change in Team Functioning (Learning Behavior) From Baseline to 12-month Follow-up
大体时间：Baseline, month 12
|
Affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes and states will be assessed with survey items rated on Likert scales. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more adaptive team functioning (range 1-7). Learning behavior was assessed with 3 items. |
Baseline, month 12
|
|
Change in Team Performance From Baseline to 6- and 12-month Follow-up
大体时间：Baseline, month 6, month 12
|
The overall quality of work done by the team will be assessed with 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate better performance (range 1-5). |
Baseline, month 6, month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Acceptability Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
大体时间：Month 6
|
Perceived acceptability of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
CPM-PTS Acceptability Assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
大体时间：Month 12
|
Perceived acceptability of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Appropriateness Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
大体时间：Month 6
|
Perceived appropriateness of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
CPM-PTS Appropriateness Assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
大体时间：Month 12
|
Perceived appropriateness of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Feasibility Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
大体时间：Month 6
|
Perceived feasibility of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 6
|
|
CPM-PTS Feasibility Assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
大体时间：Month 12
|
Perceived feasibility of the CPM-PTS will be assessed with items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Scores will be averaged; higher scores indicate more positive perceptions (range 1-5). |
Month 12
|
|
CPM-PTS Adoption
大体时间：From start of the study for up to 12 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
Adoption will be indicated by the number of days from training to the first completed screening. |
From start of the study for up to 12 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
|
CPM-PTS Reach
大体时间：Monthly for 9 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
Reach will be indicated by screening rates (i.e., completed screenings / eligible children) and calculated for monthly and quarterly periods (possible range 0-100%). Reported below are the average monthly screening rate over 9 months (all available data) and the average quarterly screening rate across 3 quarters (all available data). |
Monthly for 9 months after CPM-PTS implementation
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Caregiver Understanding of Mental Health Needs
大体时间：Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
Caregivers will rate 1 item assessing their understanding of their child's mental health needs on a 4-point Likert scale (range 1-4) in an anonymous end of visit survey. |
Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
|
Caregiver Intention to Initiate Mental Health Services
大体时间：Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
Caregivers will rate 1 item assessing their intention to initiate mental health services for their child on a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5) in an anonymous end of visit survey. |
Collected immediately after CAC visit for all caregivers served during an 18 month period (beginning 6 months before CPM-PTS implementation and continuing for 12 months after implementation)
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Elizabeth McGuier, PhD、University of Pittsburgh
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
IPD 计划说明
Deidentified data will be available upon reasonable request as allowed by IRB regulations and after manuscripts reporting the main findings are accepted for publication.
IPD 共享时间框架
Data will be available after manuscripts reporting the main findings are accepted for publication.
IPD 共享访问标准
Contact the principal investigator to request access to the deidentified data.
IPD 共享支持信息类型
- 研究方案
- 树液
- 国际碳纤维联合会
- 分析代码
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.