Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Home Based Care Transitions Tailored by Cognition and Patient Activation

torstai 11. toukokuuta 2017 päivittänyt: Lani M. Zimmerman, BSN MSN PhD, University of Nebraska

Home Based Care Transitions Tailored by Cognition and Patient Activation: A Prudent Use of Transitional Care Resources

There is overwhelming evidence that patients with multiple chronic illnesses need better self-management skills. Discharge from the hospital may not be the most opportune time to be teaching patients these self-management skills. There are several different care transition models being used across the country; however we know that not every patient needs the same type or amount of an intervention. The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the effects of delivering a home based care transitions intervention (HBCTI) with four different groups tailored on cognition and level of patient activation compared to usual care (UC) on the outcomes of health care utilization (HCU) and health outcomes: patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life in adult patients with multiple chronic diseases dismissed to home from an acute care facility. Our working hypothesis is that patients in the HBCTI groups compared to the UC group will have lower HCU and improved outcomes (patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life).

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus

One in five Medicare patients discharged from the hospital experience readmission within 30 days. Too often, hospital readmissions result from inadequate transition from hospital to home at discharge. Care transitions are complicated because of high patient acuity, multiple comorbidities, decreased length of stay, and multiple clinician involvement increasing the number of handoffs. With decreased length of stay, many patients do not comprehend or feel confident with instructions for discharge, thus management of their chronic illnesses are difficult. Most formal care transition programs are standardized and every patient receives similar strategies or interventions. However, it has been well documented that patients with cognitive problems and decreased activation are at high risk for re-hospitalization related to impaired self-management. We believe that assessment of cognition and patient activation during the patient's hospitalization will provide valuable information for discharge interventions. Data related to cognition and activation can be used to tailor discharge planning and help determine what type and how many resources are needed for individual patients after hospital discharge. The purpose of this feasibility study is to examine the effects of delivering a home based care transitions intervention (HBCTI) with four different groups tailored on cognition and level of patient activation compared to usual care (UC) on the outcomes of health care utilization (HCU) and health outcomes: patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life in adult patients with multiple chronic diseases discharged to home from the hospital.

We will test our intervention with the following aims: Aim 1.To evaluate the effects of HBCTI on health care utilization. We will measure HCU (number of emergency department(ED) visits, number of unplanned clinic visits, and number of readmissions) at 1, 2, and 6 months after discharge. Our working hypothesis is that patients in the HBCTI groups compared to the UC group will have lower HCU over time (at 1, 2 and 6 months); Aim 2. To evaluate the effects of HBCTI on the following health outcomes: patient-reported health status (PROMIS-29), assessment of care for chronic conditions (PACIC), and quality of life (EuroQol). Our working hypothesis is that patients in the HBCTI groups compared to the UC group will have improved patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life (EuroQol) at 1, 2, and 6 months after discharge.

The findings from this study have the potential to change this paradigm in three ways: 1) we will gain a better understanding of the role of cognition and patient activation in promoting self-management to enhance outcomes; 2). our innovative approach, which considers the unique needs of patients based on their level of cognition and patient activation will advance new concepts in care transition programs; 3) we will have a better understanding of varying intensities of visits, level of providers, and type and amount of strategies administered. This practical model for care transitions could serve as a model within the larger health care delivery system that could result in significant cost savings.

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)

222

Vaihe

  • Ei sovellettavissa

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskelupaikat

    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, Yhdysvallat, 68510
        • Saint Elizabeth Regional Medical Center

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

19 vuotta ja vanhemmat (Aikuinen, Vanhempi Aikuinen)

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Ei

Sukupuolet, jotka voivat opiskella

Kaikki

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult Patients (age 19 and older) being discharged from the hospital with three or more chronic diseases;
  • Have a score greater than 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (dementia);
  • Reside within a 35 mile radius of Lincoln, Ne.; and
  • Able to hear, speak and read English.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if they:

  • have a terminal illness;
  • have a score of less than 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (dementia);
  • are under the care of The Physicians Network (TPN) at St. Elizabeth Regional Medical Center (SERMC).

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Hoito
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Kokeellinen: Grp 1 Low Cognition, Low Activation
Group 1: Subjects will receive an 8 week care transition intervention with an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse-Nurse Practitioner (APRN-NP) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The APRN-NP will guide the care transition intervention. This group will receive the most intense intervention.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Education is provided at a 5th grade reading level. The "teach back" method is used to validate knowledge, skills and confidence. Once knowledge is validated, the interventions focused on motivation.
Muut nimet:
  • Low Cognition, Low Activation
Kokeellinen: Grp 2 Low Cognition, High Activation
Group 2: Subjects will receive an 8 week care transition intervention with an APRN-NP and CNA. The APRN-NP will guide the care transition intervention. This group will receive an intense intervention.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Education is provided at a 5th grade reading level. The "teach back" method is used to validate knowledge, skills and confidence. Once knowledge is validated, the interventions focused on motivation and handling stressful situations.
Kokeellinen: Grp 3 Normal Cognition, Low Activation
Group 3: Subjects will receive an 4 week care transition intervention with a Registered Nurse (RN) Coach. This group will be evaluated at four weeks, if the patient activation levels are still low, they will be referred to the 4 week APRN-NP and CNA.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Education is provided for areas of misunderstanding. The "teach back" method is used to validate knowledge, skills and confidence. Interventions are focused on motivation and developing personal behavioral goals.
Kokeellinen: Grp 4 Normal Cognition, High Activation
Group 4: Subjects will receive the least intensive intervention delivered by a RN coach.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Focus is on maintaining behaviors during hardship and stress. Empowering, motivating and validating are strategies utilized.

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Health Care Utilization
Aikaikkuna: 6 months
Number of Emergency Department Visits and number of re-admissions to the hospital within a 6 month time period will be measured. Validation data will be obtained from the clinical sites.
6 months

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Patient reported health status.
Aikaikkuna: 1 month, 2 months and 6 months
Data from the patient-reported health status (PROMIS measure), assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life (EQ-5D) at 1, 2, and 6 months after discharge will be measured and compared for group differences.
1 month, 2 months and 6 months

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Tutkijat

  • Päätutkija: Lani M Zimmerman, PhD, University of Nebraska

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus

Tiistai 1. lokakuuta 2013

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Maanantai 1. joulukuuta 2014

Opintojen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Maanantai 1. joulukuuta 2014

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Keskiviikko 22. tammikuuta 2014

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Keskiviikko 22. tammikuuta 2014

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Arvio)

Perjantai 24. tammikuuta 2014

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Perjantai 12. toukokuuta 2017

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Torstai 11. toukokuuta 2017

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Maanantai 1. toukokuuta 2017

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot

  • 336-13-EP

Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)

Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?

EI

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Kliiniset tutkimukset Krooninen sairaus

Kliiniset tutkimukset Grp 1 Low Cognition, Low Activation

3
Tilaa