Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Home Based Care Transitions Tailored by Cognition and Patient Activation

11. Mai 2017 aktualisiert von: Lani M. Zimmerman, BSN MSN PhD, University of Nebraska

Home Based Care Transitions Tailored by Cognition and Patient Activation: A Prudent Use of Transitional Care Resources

There is overwhelming evidence that patients with multiple chronic illnesses need better self-management skills. Discharge from the hospital may not be the most opportune time to be teaching patients these self-management skills. There are several different care transition models being used across the country; however we know that not every patient needs the same type or amount of an intervention. The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the effects of delivering a home based care transitions intervention (HBCTI) with four different groups tailored on cognition and level of patient activation compared to usual care (UC) on the outcomes of health care utilization (HCU) and health outcomes: patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life in adult patients with multiple chronic diseases dismissed to home from an acute care facility. Our working hypothesis is that patients in the HBCTI groups compared to the UC group will have lower HCU and improved outcomes (patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life).

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

One in five Medicare patients discharged from the hospital experience readmission within 30 days. Too often, hospital readmissions result from inadequate transition from hospital to home at discharge. Care transitions are complicated because of high patient acuity, multiple comorbidities, decreased length of stay, and multiple clinician involvement increasing the number of handoffs. With decreased length of stay, many patients do not comprehend or feel confident with instructions for discharge, thus management of their chronic illnesses are difficult. Most formal care transition programs are standardized and every patient receives similar strategies or interventions. However, it has been well documented that patients with cognitive problems and decreased activation are at high risk for re-hospitalization related to impaired self-management. We believe that assessment of cognition and patient activation during the patient's hospitalization will provide valuable information for discharge interventions. Data related to cognition and activation can be used to tailor discharge planning and help determine what type and how many resources are needed for individual patients after hospital discharge. The purpose of this feasibility study is to examine the effects of delivering a home based care transitions intervention (HBCTI) with four different groups tailored on cognition and level of patient activation compared to usual care (UC) on the outcomes of health care utilization (HCU) and health outcomes: patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life in adult patients with multiple chronic diseases discharged to home from the hospital.

We will test our intervention with the following aims: Aim 1.To evaluate the effects of HBCTI on health care utilization. We will measure HCU (number of emergency department(ED) visits, number of unplanned clinic visits, and number of readmissions) at 1, 2, and 6 months after discharge. Our working hypothesis is that patients in the HBCTI groups compared to the UC group will have lower HCU over time (at 1, 2 and 6 months); Aim 2. To evaluate the effects of HBCTI on the following health outcomes: patient-reported health status (PROMIS-29), assessment of care for chronic conditions (PACIC), and quality of life (EuroQol). Our working hypothesis is that patients in the HBCTI groups compared to the UC group will have improved patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life (EuroQol) at 1, 2, and 6 months after discharge.

The findings from this study have the potential to change this paradigm in three ways: 1) we will gain a better understanding of the role of cognition and patient activation in promoting self-management to enhance outcomes; 2). our innovative approach, which considers the unique needs of patients based on their level of cognition and patient activation will advance new concepts in care transition programs; 3) we will have a better understanding of varying intensities of visits, level of providers, and type and amount of strategies administered. This practical model for care transitions could serve as a model within the larger health care delivery system that could result in significant cost savings.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

222

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, Vereinigte Staaten, 68510
        • Saint Elizabeth Regional Medical Center

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

19 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult Patients (age 19 and older) being discharged from the hospital with three or more chronic diseases;
  • Have a score greater than 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (dementia);
  • Reside within a 35 mile radius of Lincoln, Ne.; and
  • Able to hear, speak and read English.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if they:

  • have a terminal illness;
  • have a score of less than 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (dementia);
  • are under the care of The Physicians Network (TPN) at St. Elizabeth Regional Medical Center (SERMC).

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Grp 1 Low Cognition, Low Activation
Group 1: Subjects will receive an 8 week care transition intervention with an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse-Nurse Practitioner (APRN-NP) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The APRN-NP will guide the care transition intervention. This group will receive the most intense intervention.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Education is provided at a 5th grade reading level. The "teach back" method is used to validate knowledge, skills and confidence. Once knowledge is validated, the interventions focused on motivation.
Andere Namen:
  • Low Cognition, Low Activation
Experimental: Grp 2 Low Cognition, High Activation
Group 2: Subjects will receive an 8 week care transition intervention with an APRN-NP and CNA. The APRN-NP will guide the care transition intervention. This group will receive an intense intervention.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Education is provided at a 5th grade reading level. The "teach back" method is used to validate knowledge, skills and confidence. Once knowledge is validated, the interventions focused on motivation and handling stressful situations.
Experimental: Grp 3 Normal Cognition, Low Activation
Group 3: Subjects will receive an 4 week care transition intervention with a Registered Nurse (RN) Coach. This group will be evaluated at four weeks, if the patient activation levels are still low, they will be referred to the 4 week APRN-NP and CNA.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Education is provided for areas of misunderstanding. The "teach back" method is used to validate knowledge, skills and confidence. Interventions are focused on motivation and developing personal behavioral goals.
Experimental: Grp 4 Normal Cognition, High Activation
Group 4: Subjects will receive the least intensive intervention delivered by a RN coach.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Focus is on maintaining behaviors during hardship and stress. Empowering, motivating and validating are strategies utilized.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Health Care Utilization
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Number of Emergency Department Visits and number of re-admissions to the hospital within a 6 month time period will be measured. Validation data will be obtained from the clinical sites.
6 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Patient reported health status.
Zeitfenster: 1 month, 2 months and 6 months
Data from the patient-reported health status (PROMIS measure), assessment of care for chronic conditions, and quality of life (EQ-5D) at 1, 2, and 6 months after discharge will be measured and compared for group differences.
1 month, 2 months and 6 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Lani M Zimmerman, PhD, University of Nebraska

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Oktober 2013

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Dezember 2014

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Dezember 2014

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

22. Januar 2014

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

22. Januar 2014

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

24. Januar 2014

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

12. Mai 2017

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

11. Mai 2017

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2017

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 336-13-EP

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Grp 1 Low Cognition, Low Activation

3
Abonnieren