Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Contribution of an Off-the-shelf Carbon Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) in the Management of Walking Functional Impairment (DEFISTEP)

26 aprile 2022 aggiornato da: Thuasne

Single Case Experimental Design (SCED) Comparing an Off-the-shelf Carbon Ankle Foot Orthosis (SPRYSTEP) Versus an off-the Shelf Standard Plastic Ankle Foot Orthosis in the Treatment of Walking Functional Impairment

The objective of this study is to assess the superiority in achieving personal goals (set by the patient and the medical team) according to the GAS scale (Goal Attainment Scaling) while wearing the carbon medical device Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) compared to a standard plastic ankle foot orthosis.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Foot drop is a symptom observed in various pathologies including neuro-muscular pathologies of peripheral or central origin. It is a walking disability, causing a deterioration in the patients autonomy and quality of life.

The current medical strategy focuses on various off-the-shelf or custom made devices, depending on the walking functional impairment and the characteristics of foot deformities.

The objective of this study is to assess the superiority in achieving personal goals (set by the patient and the medical team) according to the GAS scale (Goal Attainment Scaling) while wearing the carbon medical device ankle foot orthosis compared to a standard plastic ankle foot orthosis.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Anticipato)

20

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a foot levator muscles impairment (single or bilateral drop foot) and / or instability of the back of the foot, associated with a deficit of the triceps
  • Patient with inability to stand on tip-toe on one foot
  • Patient having signed a free and informed consent
  • Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with fixed varus-equine foot
  • Patient with an unstable skin condition (whether or not treated with additional treatment that may change the footwear)
  • Patient with a a foot levator muscles impairment with a deficiency of the quadriceps and hamstrings (knee involvement)
  • Patient with uncontrolled spasticity
  • Patient for whom foot surgery is planned during the study
  • Patient with one of the contraindications to the use of carbon medical device, indicated in the instructions for use
  • Patient with one of the contraindications to the use of the standard plastic ankle foot orthosis, indicated in the instructions for use
  • Patient with orthopedic comorbidities affecting the musculoskeletal system
  • Pregnant woman
  • Patient with major cognitive impairment incompatible with participation in a clinical trial
  • Patient participating in another clinical investigation conducted to establish the compliance of a MD impacting the evaluation criteria
  • Patient who cannot be followed for 12 weeks
  • Vulnerable patient according to article L1121-6 of the public health code, persons subject to a measure of judicial protection or unable to consent freely

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione sequenziale
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Self-comparison

Patients will be fitted with 2 types of ankle foot orthoses, alternately, divided into 4 phases, in the following order:

Phase A1: Standard Plastic ankle foot orthosis Phase B1: carbon medical device ankle foot orthosis Phase A2: Standard Plastic ankle foot orthosis Phase B2: carbon medical device ankle foot orthosis Each patient is his own comparator. For all patients, the total duration of the study will be the same, and will correspond to 12 weeks.

Plastic standard ankle foot orthosis
carbon medical device ankle foot orthosis
Plastic standard ankle foot orthosis
carbon medical device ankle foot orthosis

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Comparison of the ability to achieve personal goals while wearing carbon or standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: 3 times a week during 12 weeks

Personal goals achievement is evaluated via the Goal attainment scaling (GAS). Before starting the study, three personal objectives are defined according to patients needs and investigator review.

Raw scores ranging from -3 (degradation) to +2 (maximum achievement of the objective) are defined:

"-3" corresponding to degradation "-2" corresponding to the initial state "-1" corresponding to a partial objective achievement "0" corresponding to the total objective achievement "+1" corresponding to a better objective achievement "+2" corresponding to the maximum objective achievement. The GAS is filled 3 times a week during 12 weeks.

3 times a week during 12 weeks

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Comparison of patients mobility while wearing carbon or standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12).
Mobility is evaluated via staircase tests: Time (in minutes) to go up and down 10 steps
Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12).
Comparison of patients walking perimeter while wearing carbon or standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Walking perimeter is evaluated via the Six-minute walk test (6MWT), that measures the distance (in meters) during a 6 minutes walk.
Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Comparison of patients fatigue while wearing carbon or standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Patient's fatigue perception is assessed by the patient via the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale following mobility and walking perimeter tests The effort rating is based on a scale of 6 to 20 (6, which is "no effort", to 20, which is "maximum effort").
Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Comparison of patients stability while wearing carbon or standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)

Patient's stability is assessed by 2 means:

  1. via the Timed Up and Go test : time (in seconds) to realize the test. The patient should stand up from a chair, walk a distance of three meters, turn around, then walk back to the chair and sit down. These tasks should be performed at a comfortable and safe speed.
  2. via the number of falls recorded during each phase and their context
Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Comparison of patients disability evolution according to the investigator while wearing carbon or standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)

Doctors' opinion on the Patients disability evolution is measured by the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) questionnaire.

The scale has 7 levels of answer from "very strongly improved" which is the better outcome (= 1 point) to "very strongly aggravated" which is the worst outcome (= 7 points) .Intermediate levels are: " Significantly improved "(= 2 points) ; " Slightly improved " (= 3 points) ; " No improvement " (=4 points) ; " Slightly worsen " (=5 points) ; " Seriously worsen" ( = 6 points).

The highest score corresponds to the most impairment in quality of life.

Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Comparison of patients disability evolution according to the patient while wearing carbon or standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)

Patient's opinion on his disability evolution is measured by the Global Impression of Change (PCI-C).

The scale has 7 levels from "no change or condition has got worsed"(worse outcome) to "a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference ( better outcome)". Intermediate levels are: "almost the same, hardly any change at all"; "a little better, but no noticeable change", "somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference"; "moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change"; "better, and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference.

Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Comparison of pain, gait and balance evolution according to the patient while wearing carbon or standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)

Pain level is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no pain (better outcome) and 10 to maximum pain (worst outcome).

Natural gait and confidence in walking are measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no natural gait or no confidence (worst outcome) and 10 to better natural gait and better confidence (better outcome).

Balance is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no balance (worst outcome) and 10 to maximum balance (better outcome).

Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Comparison of tolerance of carbon and standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Tolerance is measured by reported adverse events. Number and type of serious and non-serious Adverse Device Effects (ADE) are reported.
Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Comparison of acceptability and compliance with carbon and standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Cumulative wearing time of the devices under study (indicated by a thermal button inserted into the device) is collected during each phase. Specific questions on compliance are also asked by the investigator to the patient during the various visits.
Visits V0 (Day 0), V1 (between week 2 and 3), V2 (between week 5 and 6), V3 (between week 8 and 9) and V4 (Week 12)
Patients satisfaction with carbon and standard plastic ankle foot orthosis
Lasso di tempo: V4 at 12 weeks
Patients satisfaction is evaluated at the end of phase B2 regarding the use of the study devices via the "Technology" part of the evaluation towards a technical aid questionnaire (8 questions) and a specific questionnaire.
V4 at 12 weeks

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Philippe THOUMIE, MD PhD, Hôpital Rothschild (Paris)

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

28 febbraio 2022

Completamento primario (Anticipato)

1 dicembre 2022

Completamento dello studio (Anticipato)

1 dicembre 2022

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

29 ottobre 2021

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

10 novembre 2021

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

23 novembre 2021

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

27 aprile 2022

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

26 aprile 2022

Ultimo verificato

1 aprile 2022

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 2021-A02115-36

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Phase A1

3
Sottoscrivi