Young Driver Intervention Study: Preventing Motor Vehicle Crashes Among Young Drivers
Young Driver Intervention Study: Preventing Motor Vehicle Crashes
Sponsors
Source
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Oversight Info
Has Dmc
No
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a program designed to reduce
teen crashes and risky driving by increasing parental monitoring and restriction of their
adolescents' driving practices during the first year of licensed driving.
Detailed Description
Motor vehicle crashes are the major cause of death and disability among adolescents from 16
through 20 years of age. While adolescents between the ages of 16 and 19 years constitute
only 5% of all licensed drivers, they are involved in 15% of the crashes in which they or
other occupants are killed. In fact, 16-year-old drivers are more than 20 times as likely to
have a crash as the general population of drivers and 17-year-olds are more than 6 times as
likely. In addition, for each adolescent motor vehicle fatality, approximately 100 nonfatal
injuries occur, making crashes the leading cause of disability due to head and spinal cord
injuries in adolescents.
Parents can have a huge impact on adolescent behavior. However, the impact of parenting
practices on adolescent driving behavior has not yet been examined. This study aims to
determine the efficacy of an intervention designed to increase parents' involvement in, and
parental restrictions on, their teens' early driving experiences in order to reduce the
number of tickets and crashes among teen drivers. The intervention provides educational
materials to parents and adolescents from the time the adolescent gets a learner's permit
through the first 6 months of licensure. These persuasive communications are tailored to
adolescents' level of driving experience. The intervention materials make explicit the
increased risk associated with adolescent driving and methods for reducing risk through
increased parental involvement in and restriction of driving.
Participants were recruited in the Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicle offices as
adolescents applied for their learner's permits. Participants were randomized to either the
intervention group or the control group. The control group received standard information
about driving not related to the specific teen risks focused on in the intervention group
materials. All participants completed interviews at study entry, licensure, 3 months after
licensure, 6 months after licensure, and 12 months after licensure. Parents were asked about
their expectations and parenting practices regarding their adolescents' driving behaviors.
Adolescents were asked about their driving practices and their parents' rules and
restrictions regarding driving. The driving records for each adolescent were obtained from
the state motor vehicle administration and examined 18 months after licensure.
Overall Status
Completed
Start Date
1998-09-01
Completion Date
2005-09-01
Primary Completion Date
2000-09-01
Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Primary Outcome
Measure |
Time Frame |
Risky Driving |
12 months |
Enrollment
3743
Conditions
Intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name
Description
A behavioral intervention targeting driving risks unique to young drivers, including completing a behavioral contract, was administered to the intervention group. The control group received safety information appropriate for new drivers.
Arm Group Label
Teen Driving: Program for parents
Eligibility
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Lives with parent/guardian at least 50% of the time
- Obtains learner's driving permit
- Family members are able to complete interviews in English
Gender
All
Minimum Age
16 Years
Maximum Age
16 Years
Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Overall Official
Last Name |
Role |
Affiliation |
Bruce Simons-Morton, EdD, MPH |
Principal Investigator |
Prevention Research Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, NICHD |
Verification Date
2014-09-01
Lastchanged Date
N/A
Firstreceived Date
N/A
Responsible Party
Responsible Party Type
Principal Investigator
Investigator Affiliation
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Investigator Full Name
Denise Haynie
Investigator Title
Staff Scientist
Keywords
Has Expanded Access
No
Secondary Id
Z01HD001707-01
N01-HD-8-3285
Number Of Arms
1
Arm Group
Arm Group Label
Teen Driving: Program for parents
Arm Group Type
Other
Description
A behavioral intervention targeting driving risks unique to young drivers, including completing a behavioral contract, was administered to the intervention group. The control group received safety information appropriate for new drivers.
Firstreceived Results Date
N/A
Reference
Citation
Simons-Morton BG, Hartos JL. How well do parents manage young driver crash risks? J Safety Res. 2003 Jan;34(1):91-7.
PMID
12535911
Citation
Simons-Morton BG, Hartos JL, Leaf WA. Promoting parental management of teen driving. Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8 Suppl 2:ii24-30; discussion ii30-1.
PMID
12221027
Citation
Simons-Morton BG. Reducing young driver crash risk. Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8 Suppl 2:ii1-2.
PMID
12221023
Firstreceived Results Disposition Date
N/A
Study Design Info
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Factorial Assignment
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Participant)
Study First Submitted
June 17, 2003
Study First Submitted Qc
June 17, 2003
Study First Posted
June 18, 2003
Last Update Submitted
September 24, 2014
Last Update Submitted Qc
September 24, 2014
Last Update Posted
September 25, 2014
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on November 27, 2019
Conditions
Conditions usually refer to a disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury. In ClinicalTrials.gov,
conditions include any health issue worth studying, such as lifespan, quality of life, health risks, etc.
Interventions
Interventions refer to the drug, vaccine, procedure, device, or other potential treatment being studied.
Interventions can also include less intrusive possibilities such as surveys, education, and interviews.
Study Phase
Most clinical trials are designated as phase 1, 2, 3, or 4, based on the type of questions
that study is seeking to answer:
In Phase 1 (Phase I) clinical trials, researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people (20-80) for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
In Phase 2 (Phase II) clinical trials, the study drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people (100-300) to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
In Phase 3 (Phase III) clinical trials, the study drug or treatment is given to large groups of people (1,000-3,000) to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
In Phase 4 (Phase IV) clinical trials, post marketing studies delineate additional information including the drug's risks, benefits, and optimal use.
These phases are defined by the Food and Drug Administration in the Code of Federal Regulations.
In Phase 1 (Phase I) clinical trials, researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people (20-80) for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
In Phase 2 (Phase II) clinical trials, the study drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people (100-300) to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
In Phase 3 (Phase III) clinical trials, the study drug or treatment is given to large groups of people (1,000-3,000) to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
In Phase 4 (Phase IV) clinical trials, post marketing studies delineate additional information including the drug's risks, benefits, and optimal use.
These phases are defined by the Food and Drug Administration in the Code of Federal Regulations.