Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Intervento di Esercizio Personalizzato, Supervisionato e Remoto per Migliorare la Funzione Fisica nei Sopravvissuti al Cancro Gastroesofageo di Stadio I-III, Studio PRECISE (PRECISE)

3 novembre 2026 aggiornato da: Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Uno Studio Pilota di un Intervento di Esercizio Fisico Individualmente Personalizzato, Supervisionato e Somministrato a Distanza per Migliorare la Funzione Fisica nei Sopravvissuti al Cancro Gastroesofageo (Studio PRECISE)

This clinical trial tests an individually tailored, supervised, remote exercise intervention to improve physical function for stage I-III gastroesophageal cancer survivors. Modern treatments for gastroesophageal cancer are effective at treating the cancer but are often aggressive, can be difficult for patients to tolerate, and can lead to significant debilitation and a loss of independence. Exercise is one promising intervention that could improve physical function in patients with gastroesophageal cancer after finishing systemic treatment. Home based exercise interventions in patients with cancer during and after chemotherapy can improve fatigue and function. An individually tailored, supervised, remote exercise intervention may improve physical function for stage I-III gastroesophageal cancer survivors.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the feasibility of the exercise intervention, as measured by the percentage of participants who attend at least 80% of the exercise sessions and complete the post-intervention functional assessment.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine other measures of feasibility of the exercise intervention, including eligibility, recruitment, and achievement of exercise goals.

II. To determine the change in measures of physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB], grip strength, Two Minute Step Test [TMST], Activities of Daily Living [ADL], and instrumental ADL) from baseline to end of study.

III. To determine the change in frailty status (Deficit Accumulation Index [DAI]) from baseline to end of study.

IV. To determine the change in measures of cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MOCA] and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cognitive Function Short Form) from baseline to end of study.

V. To determine the change in anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]) from baseline to end of study.

VI. To determine the change in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8 [PHQ-8]) from baseline to end of study.

VII. To determine the change in sleep quality (Insomnia Severity Index) from baseline to end of study.

VIII. To determine the change in quality of life (Short Form [SF]-36) from baseline to end of study.

IX. To evaluate adverse events (Patient Reported Outcomes version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [PRO-CTCAE] and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version [v]5.0) during the study intervention.

X. To identify patient perspectives on the whether or not the study intervention was worthwhile.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the reliability of using remote monitoring devices to measure functional health in real-time during the study intervention.

II. To determine the change in biomarkers of aging from baseline to end of study.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive access to the Moterum application and complete remotely delivered, supervised exercise sessions, over 1 hour, 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Sessions consist of both aerobic and resistance training exercises. Patients also receive written instructions and videos of strengthening exercises. Patients undergo blood sample collection throughout the study.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at 6 months.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

20

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Stati Uniti, 90095
        • Reclutamento
        • UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contatto:
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Jingran Ji, MD

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ≥ 18 years old at the start of study treatment
  • Diagnosis of early-stage (Stage I, II, III) esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric cancer. Histology can be adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or poorly differentiated carcinoma
  • Treated with at least one systemic therapy (chemotherapy or immunotherapy) and within 12 months of completing curative intent gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) treatment
  • Have evidence of physical function impairment, defined as a SPPB score of < 12) at baseline
  • Ability to understand English and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with stage I disease who underwent endoscopic resection or surgery alone without perioperative systemic therapy
  • Patients with stage IV disease or unresectable locally advanced disease taking a palliative treatment approach without a clearly defined end of treatment
  • Patients currently receiving ongoing systemic therapy for GEC or another malignancy
  • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
  • Any other condition or pre-existing co-morbidity that would, in the Investigator's judgment, contraindicate the participation in the study due to safety concerns with study procedures
  • Currently participating in another exercise intervention research study seeking to improve functional status, alleviate frailty, muscle strength, exhaustion/fatigue, or cognitive function

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Terapia di supporto
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Supportive care (Remote exercise intervention)

Patients receive access to the Moterum application and complete remotely delivered, supervised exercise sessions, over 1 hour, 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Sessions consist of both aerobic and resistance training exercises. Patients also receive written instructions and videos of strengthening exercises. Patients undergo blood sample collection throughout the study.

Undergo blood sample collection

Altri nomi:
  • Raccolta di campioni biologici
  • Biocampione raccolto
  • Raccolta di campioni

Ancillary studies

Ancillary studies

Ancillary studies

Receive written instructions

Altri nomi:
  • Educazione all'intervento
  • Intervento dell'Educazione
  • Intervenire attraverso l'educazione
  • Intervento, Educativo

Receive videos of strengthening exercises

Altri nomi:
  • Educazione all'intervento
  • Intervento dell'Educazione
  • Intervenire attraverso l'educazione
  • Intervento, Educativo

Compete exercise sessions

Receive access to Moterum application

Ancillary studies

Altri nomi:
  • Test di idoneità fisica
  • Test di funzionalità fisica

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Percentage of participants who attend at least 80% of the exercise sessions and complete the post-intervention functional assessment
Lasso di tempo: At 8 weeks

Will use descriptive statistics to summarize the participant population, feasibility metrics, and safety data. The study will be deemed feasible if > 60% (12 or more) of the 20 enrolled participants are retained.

At 8 weeks

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Percentuale di pazienti sottoposti a screening che soddisfano i criteri per l'intervento
Lasso di tempo: Fino a 16 mesi
Fino a 16 mesi
Percentuale di pazienti idonei che acconsentono a partecipare all'intervento
Lasso di tempo: Fino a 6 mesi
Fino a 6 mesi
Percentuale di partecipanti idonei che soddisfano gli obiettivi di durata e intensità per gli esercizi aerobici e di resistenza entro la fine del periodo di studio
Lasso di tempo: Fino a 8 settimane
Fino a 8 settimane
Change in physical function
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Assessed via Short Physical Performance Battery. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in grip strength
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in physical function
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Assessed via the two minute step test. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The two-minute step test is administered by measuring the midpoint of the participant's patella and the top of their iliac crest and measuring how many times the participant's right knee can reach this point while marching in place for 2 minutes. A higher step count means a better outcome.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in activities of daily living
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The activities of daily living assessment is a calculated from the physical component score of the Short Form-36 health survey. This section consists of 10 items that assess different physical activity domains. Each item has a specific response scale which corresponds to a number. These numbers are summed and transformed into a 0-100 scale, where 0 indicates the worst health and 100 indicates the best health.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in instrumental activities of daily living
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 8 weeks

Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The instrumental activities of daily living assessment is a 10 items survey that assess different physical activity domains. Each item will be rated and scored based on responses denoting level of limitation (a lot, a little, not at all). The total score ranges from 0 to 100 and higher scores means a better outcome.

From baseline to 8 weeks
Change in frailty status
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Deficit Accumulation Index. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The Deficit Accumulation Index (DAI) is a 50-item frailty index that is derived from the Cancer and Aging Research Group geriatric assessment. The DAI evaluates deficits in multiple geriatric assessment domains. Scores range from 0-1 with a score of 0.0 representing no detected deficits and 1.0 representing the maximum deficit. Based on the score, participants will be categorized into three categories of health status: robust, prefrail, or frail.

From baseline to 6 months
Change in cognitive function
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test is a series of questions and assessments to measure eight domains of cognitive function. The MoCA is score from 0-30 with lower scores indicating worse cognitive impairment. A score of <25 suggests some degree of cognitive impairment.

From baseline to 6 months
Change in cognitive function
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Cognitive Function Short Form. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Cognitive Function Short Form 8a provides a self-reported measure of cognitive function consisting of 8 items. Each item includes a statement related to cognitive function that the patient would rate with an attribution (very often (several times a day), often (about once a day), sometimes (two or three times), rarely (once), never) that ranges from 0-5. The items will be summed to obtain a composite score from 0-40 and higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

From baseline to 6 months
Change in quality of life
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via 36-Item Short Form Survey. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a composite measure of quality of life that includes 36 items related to physical (10 items) and social functioning (2 items), pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health (4 items) and emotional problems (3 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), and health perceptions (6 items). Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range, in which a high score represents a more favorable health state.

From baseline to 6 months
Change in sleep quality
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Insomnia Severity Index. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The Insomnia Severity Index is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses sleep problems over a 2-week time interval. Higher scores indicate more acute symptoms of insomnia (no clinically significant insomnia [0-7], subthreshold insomnia [8-14], moderate clinical insomnia [15-21], severe clinical insomnia [22-28]).

From baseline to 6 months
Change in anxiety
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via General Anxiety Disorder-7. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The General Anxiety Disorder-7 is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses anxiety severity over a 2-week time interval. This is calculated by assigning scores of 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days), and 3 (nearly every day) to each response. GAD-7 total score for the 7 items ranges from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating more anxiety (minimal anxiety [0-4], mild anxiety [5-9], moderate anxiety [10-14], severe anxiety [15-21]).

From baseline to 6 months
Change in depression
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to 6 months

Assessed via Patient Health Questionnaire-8. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. The Patient Health Questionnaire-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that assesses depression over a 2-week time interval. This is calculated by assigning scores of 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days), and 3 (nearly every day) to each response. Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of clinical depression.

From baseline to 6 months
Incidence of adverse events
Lasso di tempo: Up to 8 weeks

Assessed via National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Will be determined at each time point per patient as the presence (yes/no) of toxicities of grade ≥ 2. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. Adverse Events (AEs) experienced will be captured as defined by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v5.0). After grading, each AE will be assigned an attribution by the treating clinician (unlikely, possibly, probably, or definitely related to study agent).

Up to 8 weeks
Incidence of patient reported adverse events
Lasso di tempo: Up to 8 weeks

Assessed via Patient Reported Outcomes version of CTCAE. Will perform exploratory statistical comparisons between baseline and end of study endpoints using t-tests and Fisher exact tests to explore the efficacy of the exercise intervention. Patient-reported Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is a patient-reported outcome measurement system developed to evaluate symptomatic toxicity in patients on cancer clinical trials. Each item is scored 0-4 with higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. No total score is calculated.

Up to 8 weeks
Patient perspectives on whether or not the study intervention was worthwhile
Lasso di tempo: At 8 weeks

Assessed via Was it Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire. Will use descriptive statistics to summarize the proportion of participants who answer 'yes,' 'uncertain,' and 'no' to the items in the WIWI Questionnaire and compare responses between participants with improvement in physical function and those without, bivariately and multivariately controlling for other factors.

At 8 weeks

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Jingran Ji, MD, UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

11 settembre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 settembre 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 settembre 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

10 febbraio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

23 febbraio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

27 febbraio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

5 novembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

3 novembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 novembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi